All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Qing Zhao <qing.zhao@oracle.com>,
	Andrew Pinski <pinskia@gmail.com>,
	Richard Biener <rguenther@suse.de>,
	Joseph Myers <josmyers@redhat.com>, Jan Hubicka <hubicka@ucw.cz>,
	Richard Earnshaw <richard.earnshaw@arm.com>,
	Richard Sandiford <richard.sandiford@arm.com>,
	Marcus Shawcroft <marcus.shawcroft@arm.com>,
	Kyrylo Tkachov <kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com>,
	Kito Cheng <kito.cheng@gmail.com>,
	Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
	Andrew Waterman <andrew@sifive.com>,
	Jim Wilson <jim.wilson.gcc@gmail.com>,
	Dan Li <ashimida.1990@gmail.com>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Ramon de C Valle <rcvalle@google.com>,
	Joao Moreira <joao@overdrivepizza.com>,
	Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
	Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>,
	"gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org" <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>,
	"linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org"
	<linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] kcfi: Add core Kernel Control Flow Integrity infrastructure
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2025 23:20:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202509112320.33247B0@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250911072935.GW3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>

On Thu, Sep 11, 2025 at 09:29:35AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 10, 2025 at 08:05:11PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> 
> > > > +/* Check if a function needs KCFI preamble generation.
> > > > +   ALL functions get preambles when -fsanitize=kcfi is enabled, regardless
> > > > +   of no_sanitize("kcfi") attribute.  */
> > > 
> > > Why no_sanitize(“kcfi”) is not considered here?
> > 
> > no_sanitize(“kcfi”) is strictly about whether call-site checking
> > is performed within the function. It is not used to mark a function as
> > not being the target of a KCFI call.
> 
> I'll once again argue that __attribute__((nocf_check)) (aka. __noendbr)
> should have that effect.
> 
> If there is no ENDBR, then no amount of kCFI preamble will make the
> function (indirectly) callable.

Oh yeah, sure! I've added this for v3 now.

-- 
Kees Cook

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-12  6:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-05  0:24 [PATCH v2 0/7] Introduce Kernel Control Flow Integrity ABI [PR107048] Kees Cook
2025-09-05  0:24 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mangle: Introduce C typeinfo mangling API Kees Cook
2025-09-05  0:50   ` Andrew Pinski
2025-09-05  1:09     ` Kees Cook
2025-09-05  0:24 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] kcfi: Add core Kernel Control Flow Integrity infrastructure Kees Cook
2025-09-05  8:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-05 16:19     ` Kees Cook
2025-09-08 15:32       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-08 21:55         ` Kees Cook
2025-09-09 18:49   ` Qing Zhao
2025-09-11  3:05     ` Kees Cook
2025-09-11  7:29       ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-09-12  6:20         ` Kees Cook [this message]
2025-09-11 15:04       ` Qing Zhao
2025-09-12  7:32         ` Kees Cook
2025-09-12 14:01           ` Qing Zhao
2025-09-13  6:29             ` Kees Cook
2025-09-05  0:24 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] x86: Add x86_64 Kernel Control Flow Integrity implementation Kees Cook
2025-09-05  0:24 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] aarch64: Add AArch64 " Kees Cook
2025-09-05  0:24 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] arm: Add ARM 32-bit " Kees Cook
2025-09-11  7:49   ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-09-12  9:03     ` Kees Cook
2025-09-12  9:08       ` Kees Cook
2025-09-12  9:43         ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-09-12 19:01           ` Kees Cook
2025-09-05  0:24 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] riscv: Add RISC-V " Kees Cook
2025-09-16  3:40   ` Jeff Law
2025-09-16  6:04     ` Kees Cook
2025-10-01  0:56       ` Jeff Law
2025-09-05  0:24 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] kcfi: Add regression test suite Kees Cook
2025-09-05  7:06   ` Jakub Jelinek
2025-09-05 17:15     ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202509112320.33247B0@keescook \
    --to=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=andrew@sifive.com \
    --cc=ashimida.1990@gmail.com \
    --cc=gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org \
    --cc=hubicka@ucw.cz \
    --cc=jim.wilson.gcc@gmail.com \
    --cc=joao@overdrivepizza.com \
    --cc=josmyers@redhat.com \
    --cc=kito.cheng@gmail.com \
    --cc=kyrylo.tkachov@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=marcus.shawcroft@arm.com \
    --cc=morbo@google.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pinskia@gmail.com \
    --cc=qing.zhao@oracle.com \
    --cc=rcvalle@google.com \
    --cc=rguenther@suse.de \
    --cc=richard.earnshaw@arm.com \
    --cc=richard.sandiford@arm.com \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.