From: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
To: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/4] writeback: Avoid contention on wb->list_lock when switching inodes
Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 12:38:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250912103840.4844-5-jack@suse.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250912103522.2935-1-jack@suse.cz>
There can be multiple inode switch works that are trying to switch
inodes to / from the same wb. This can happen in particular if some
cgroup exits which owns many (thousands) inodes and we need to switch
them all. In this case several inode_switch_wbs_work_fn() instances will
be just spinning on the same wb->list_lock while only one of them makes
forward progress. This wastes CPU cycles and quickly leads to softlockup
reports and unusable system.
Instead of running several inode_switch_wbs_work_fn() instances in
parallel switching to the same wb and contending on wb->list_lock, run
just one work item per wb and manage a queue of isw items switching to
this wb.
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
---
fs/fs-writeback.c | 100 ++++++++++++++++++++-----------
include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h | 4 ++
include/linux/writeback.h | 2 +
mm/backing-dev.c | 5 ++
4 files changed, 75 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
index a07b8cf73ae2..f2265aa9b4c2 100644
--- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
+++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
@@ -368,7 +368,8 @@ static struct bdi_writeback *inode_to_wb_and_lock_list(struct inode *inode)
}
struct inode_switch_wbs_context {
- struct rcu_work work;
+ /* List of queued switching contexts for the wb */
+ struct llist_node list;
/*
* Multiple inodes can be switched at once. The switching procedure
@@ -378,7 +379,6 @@ struct inode_switch_wbs_context {
* array embedded into struct inode_switch_wbs_context. Otherwise
* an inode could be left in a non-consistent state.
*/
- struct bdi_writeback *new_wb;
struct inode *inodes[];
};
@@ -486,13 +486,11 @@ static bool inode_do_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode,
return switched;
}
-static void inode_switch_wbs_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
+static void process_inode_switch_wbs_work(struct bdi_writeback *new_wb,
+ struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw)
{
- struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw =
- container_of(to_rcu_work(work), struct inode_switch_wbs_context, work);
struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(isw->inodes[0]);
struct bdi_writeback *old_wb = isw->inodes[0]->i_wb;
- struct bdi_writeback *new_wb = isw->new_wb;
unsigned long nr_switched = 0;
struct inode **inodep;
@@ -543,6 +541,39 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
atomic_dec(&isw_nr_in_flight);
}
+void inode_switch_wbs_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ struct bdi_writeback *new_wb = container_of(work, struct bdi_writeback,
+ switch_work);
+ struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw, *next_isw;
+ struct llist_node *list;
+
+ /*
+ * Grab out reference to wb so that it cannot get freed under us
+ * after we process all the isw items.
+ */
+ wb_get(new_wb);
+ while (1) {
+ list = llist_del_all(&new_wb->switch_wbs_ctxs);
+ /* Nothing to do? */
+ if (!list) {
+ wb_put(new_wb);
+ return;
+ }
+ /*
+ * In addition to synchronizing among switchers, I_WB_SWITCH
+ * tells the RCU protected stat update paths to grab the i_page
+ * lock so that stat transfer can synchronize against them.
+ * Let's continue after I_WB_SWITCH is guaranteed to be
+ * visible.
+ */
+ synchronize_rcu();
+
+ llist_for_each_entry_safe(isw, next_isw, list, list)
+ process_inode_switch_wbs_work(new_wb, isw);
+ }
+}
+
static bool inode_prepare_wbs_switch(struct inode *inode,
struct bdi_writeback *new_wb)
{
@@ -572,6 +603,13 @@ static bool inode_prepare_wbs_switch(struct inode *inode,
return true;
}
+static void wb_queue_isw(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
+ struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw)
+{
+ if (llist_add(&isw->list, &wb->switch_wbs_ctxs))
+ queue_work(isw_wq, &wb->switch_work);
+}
+
/**
* inode_switch_wbs - change the wb association of an inode
* @inode: target inode
@@ -585,6 +623,7 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode, int new_wb_id)
struct backing_dev_info *bdi = inode_to_bdi(inode);
struct cgroup_subsys_state *memcg_css;
struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw;
+ struct bdi_writeback *new_wb = NULL;
/* noop if seems to be already in progress */
if (inode->i_state & I_WB_SWITCH)
@@ -609,40 +648,34 @@ static void inode_switch_wbs(struct inode *inode, int new_wb_id)
if (!memcg_css)
goto out_free;
- isw->new_wb = wb_get_create(bdi, memcg_css, GFP_ATOMIC);
+ new_wb = wb_get_create(bdi, memcg_css, GFP_ATOMIC);
css_put(memcg_css);
- if (!isw->new_wb)
+ if (!new_wb)
goto out_free;
- if (!inode_prepare_wbs_switch(inode, isw->new_wb))
+ if (!inode_prepare_wbs_switch(inode, new_wb))
goto out_free;
isw->inodes[0] = inode;
- /*
- * In addition to synchronizing among switchers, I_WB_SWITCH tells
- * the RCU protected stat update paths to grab the i_page
- * lock so that stat transfer can synchronize against them.
- * Let's continue after I_WB_SWITCH is guaranteed to be visible.
- */
- INIT_RCU_WORK(&isw->work, inode_switch_wbs_work_fn);
- queue_rcu_work(isw_wq, &isw->work);
+ wb_queue_isw(new_wb, isw);
return;
out_free:
atomic_dec(&isw_nr_in_flight);
- if (isw->new_wb)
- wb_put(isw->new_wb);
+ if (new_wb)
+ wb_put(new_wb);
kfree(isw);
}
-static bool isw_prepare_wbs_switch(struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw,
+static bool isw_prepare_wbs_switch(struct bdi_writeback *new_wb,
+ struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw,
struct list_head *list, int *nr)
{
struct inode *inode;
list_for_each_entry(inode, list, i_io_list) {
- if (!inode_prepare_wbs_switch(inode, isw->new_wb))
+ if (!inode_prepare_wbs_switch(inode, new_wb))
continue;
isw->inodes[*nr] = inode;
@@ -666,6 +699,7 @@ bool cleanup_offline_cgwb(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
{
struct cgroup_subsys_state *memcg_css;
struct inode_switch_wbs_context *isw;
+ struct bdi_writeback *new_wb;
int nr;
bool restart = false;
@@ -678,12 +712,12 @@ bool cleanup_offline_cgwb(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
for (memcg_css = wb->memcg_css->parent; memcg_css;
memcg_css = memcg_css->parent) {
- isw->new_wb = wb_get_create(wb->bdi, memcg_css, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (isw->new_wb)
+ new_wb = wb_get_create(wb->bdi, memcg_css, GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (new_wb)
break;
}
- if (unlikely(!isw->new_wb))
- isw->new_wb = &wb->bdi->wb; /* wb_get() is noop for bdi's wb */
+ if (unlikely(!new_wb))
+ new_wb = &wb->bdi->wb; /* wb_get() is noop for bdi's wb */
nr = 0;
spin_lock(&wb->list_lock);
@@ -695,27 +729,21 @@ bool cleanup_offline_cgwb(struct bdi_writeback *wb)
* bandwidth restrictions, as writeback of inode metadata is not
* accounted for.
*/
- restart = isw_prepare_wbs_switch(isw, &wb->b_attached, &nr);
+ restart = isw_prepare_wbs_switch(new_wb, isw, &wb->b_attached, &nr);
if (!restart)
- restart = isw_prepare_wbs_switch(isw, &wb->b_dirty_time, &nr);
+ restart = isw_prepare_wbs_switch(new_wb, isw, &wb->b_dirty_time,
+ &nr);
spin_unlock(&wb->list_lock);
/* no attached inodes? bail out */
if (nr == 0) {
atomic_dec(&isw_nr_in_flight);
- wb_put(isw->new_wb);
+ wb_put(new_wb);
kfree(isw);
return restart;
}
- /*
- * In addition to synchronizing among switchers, I_WB_SWITCH tells
- * the RCU protected stat update paths to grab the i_page
- * lock so that stat transfer can synchronize against them.
- * Let's continue after I_WB_SWITCH is guaranteed to be visible.
- */
- INIT_RCU_WORK(&isw->work, inode_switch_wbs_work_fn);
- queue_rcu_work(isw_wq, &isw->work);
+ wb_queue_isw(new_wb, isw);
return restart;
}
diff --git a/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h b/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
index 2ad261082bba..c5c9d89c73ed 100644
--- a/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
+++ b/include/linux/backing-dev-defs.h
@@ -152,6 +152,10 @@ struct bdi_writeback {
struct list_head blkcg_node; /* anchored at blkcg->cgwb_list */
struct list_head b_attached; /* attached inodes, protected by list_lock */
struct list_head offline_node; /* anchored at offline_cgwbs */
+ struct work_struct switch_work; /* work used to perform inode switching
+ * to this wb */
+ struct llist_head switch_wbs_ctxs; /* queued contexts for
+ * writeback switching */
union {
struct work_struct release_work;
diff --git a/include/linux/writeback.h b/include/linux/writeback.h
index a2848d731a46..15a4bc4ab819 100644
--- a/include/linux/writeback.h
+++ b/include/linux/writeback.h
@@ -265,6 +265,8 @@ static inline void wbc_init_bio(struct writeback_control *wbc, struct bio *bio)
bio_associate_blkg_from_css(bio, wbc->wb->blkcg_css);
}
+void inode_switch_wbs_work_fn(struct work_struct *work);
+
#else /* CONFIG_CGROUP_WRITEBACK */
static inline void inode_attach_wb(struct inode *inode, struct folio *folio)
diff --git a/mm/backing-dev.c b/mm/backing-dev.c
index 783904d8c5ef..0beaca6bacf7 100644
--- a/mm/backing-dev.c
+++ b/mm/backing-dev.c
@@ -633,6 +633,7 @@ static void cgwb_release_workfn(struct work_struct *work)
wb_exit(wb);
bdi_put(bdi);
WARN_ON_ONCE(!list_empty(&wb->b_attached));
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(work_pending(&wb->switch_work));
call_rcu(&wb->rcu, cgwb_free_rcu);
}
@@ -709,6 +710,8 @@ static int cgwb_create(struct backing_dev_info *bdi,
wb->memcg_css = memcg_css;
wb->blkcg_css = blkcg_css;
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&wb->b_attached);
+ INIT_WORK(&wb->switch_work, inode_switch_wbs_work_fn);
+ init_llist_head(&wb->switch_wbs_ctxs);
INIT_WORK(&wb->release_work, cgwb_release_workfn);
set_bit(WB_registered, &wb->state);
bdi_get(bdi);
@@ -839,6 +842,8 @@ static int cgwb_bdi_init(struct backing_dev_info *bdi)
if (!ret) {
bdi->wb.memcg_css = &root_mem_cgroup->css;
bdi->wb.blkcg_css = blkcg_root_css;
+ INIT_WORK(&bdi->wb.switch_work, inode_switch_wbs_work_fn);
+ init_llist_head(&bdi->wb.switch_wbs_ctxs);
}
return ret;
}
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-12 10:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-12 10:38 [PATCH v2 0/4] writeback: Avoid lockups when switching inodes Jan Kara
2025-09-12 10:38 ` Jan Kara [this message]
2025-09-12 16:15 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] writeback: Avoid contention on wb->list_lock " Tejun Heo
2025-09-12 16:39 ` Jan Kara
2025-09-12 16:52 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-12 16:20 ` Tejun Heo
2025-09-12 10:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] writeback: Avoid softlockup when switching many inodes Jan Kara
2025-09-12 10:38 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] writeback: Avoid excessively long inode switching times Jan Kara
2025-09-12 10:38 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] writeback: Add tracepoint to track pending inode switches Jan Kara
2025-09-15 12:50 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] writeback: Avoid lockups when switching inodes Christian Brauner
2025-09-15 15:13 ` Jan Kara
2025-09-19 11:09 ` Christian Brauner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250912103840.4844-5-jack@suse.cz \
--to=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.