From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
"K. Y. Srinivasan" <kys@microsoft.com>,
Haiyang Zhang <haiyangz@microsoft.com>,
Wei Liu <wei.liu@kernel.org>, Dexuan Cui <decui@microsoft.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Ajay Kaher <ajay.kaher@broadcom.com>,
Alexey Makhalov <alexey.makhalov@broadcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 21/21] x86/pvlocks: Move paravirt spinlock functions into own header
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 10:45:17 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202509181008.MoLd2u4e-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250917145220.31064-22-jgross@suse.com>
Hi Juergen,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on tip/sched/core]
[also build test WARNING on kvm/queue kvm/next linus/master v6.17-rc6 next-20250917]
[cannot apply to tip/x86/core kvm/linux-next]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Juergen-Gross/x86-paravirt-Remove-not-needed-includes-of-paravirt-h/20250917-230321
base: tip/sched/core
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250917145220.31064-22-jgross%40suse.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 21/21] x86/pvlocks: Move paravirt spinlock functions into own header
config: x86_64-randconfig-003-20250918 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250918/202509181008.MoLd2u4e-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250918/202509181008.MoLd2u4e-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202509181008.MoLd2u4e-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c:13:13: warning: no previous prototype for function 'native_pv_lock_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
13 | void __init native_pv_lock_init(void)
| ^
arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c:13:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
13 | void __init native_pv_lock_init(void)
| ^
| static
1 warning generated.
vim +/native_pv_lock_init +13 arch/x86/kernel/paravirt-spinlocks.c
12
> 13 void __init native_pv_lock_init(void)
14 {
15 if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR))
16 static_branch_enable(&virt_spin_lock_key);
17 }
18
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-18 2:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-17 14:51 [PATCH v2 00/21] paravirt: cleanup and reorg Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:51 ` Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 01/21] x86/paravirt: Remove not needed includes of paravirt.h Juergen Gross
2025-09-18 3:18 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 02/21] x86/paravirt: Remove some unneeded struct declarations Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 03/21] x86/paravirt: Remove PARAVIRT_DEBUG config option Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 04/21] x86/paravirt: Move thunk macros to paravirt_types.h Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 05/21] paravirt: Remove asm/paravirt_api_clock.h Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 06/21] sched: Move clock related paravirt code to kernel/sched Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 07/21] arm/paravirt: Use common code for paravirt_steal_clock() Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 08/21] arm64/paravirt: " Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 09/21] loongarch/paravirt: " Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 10/21] riscv/paravirt: " Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` Juergen Gross
2025-09-24 17:08 ` Andrew Jones
2025-09-24 17:08 ` Andrew Jones
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 11/21] x86/paravirt: " Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 12/21] x86/paravirt: Move paravirt_sched_clock() related code into tsc.c Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 13/21] x86/paravirt: Introduce new paravirt-base.h header Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 14/21] x86/paravirt: Move pv_native_*() prototypes to paravirt.c Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 15/21] x86/xen: Drop xen_irq_ops Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 16/21] x86/xen: Drop xen_cpu_ops Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 17/21] x86/xen: Drop xen_mmu_ops Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 18/21] objtool: Allow multiple pv_ops arrays Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 19/21] x86/paravirt: Allow pv-calls outside paravirt.h Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 20/21] x86/paravirt: Specify pv_ops array in paravirt macros Juergen Gross
2025-09-17 14:52 ` [PATCH v2 21/21] x86/pvlocks: Move paravirt spinlock functions into own header Juergen Gross
2025-09-18 2:45 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-09-18 5:56 ` Juergen Gross
2025-09-18 5:38 ` kernel test robot
2026-02-20 4:10 ` [PATCH v2 00/21] paravirt: cleanup and reorg patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
2026-02-20 4:10 ` patchwork-bot+linux-riscv
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202509181008.MoLd2u4e-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=ajay.kaher@broadcom.com \
--cc=alexey.makhalov@broadcom.com \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=decui@microsoft.com \
--cc=haiyangz@microsoft.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=kys@microsoft.com \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=wei.liu@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.