All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Slawomir Rosek <srosek@google.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Alex Hung <alexhung@gmail.com>, Hans de Goede <hansg@kernel.org>,
	Ilpo Jarvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>,
	AceLan Kao <acelan.kao@canonical.com>,
	Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
	Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>,
	Tomasz Nowicki <tnowicki@google.com>,
	Stanislaw Kardach <skardach@google.com>,
	Michal Krawczyk <mikrawczyk@google.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org,
	platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
	Slawomir Rosek <srosek@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] ACPI: DPTF: Ignore SoC DTS thermal while scanning
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 13:49:02 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202509181359.fLTuROj6-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250917120719.2390847-2-srosek@google.com>

Hi Slawomir,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on rafael-pm/linux-next]
[also build test ERROR on rafael-pm/bleeding-edge rafael-pm/thermal driver-core/driver-core-testing driver-core/driver-core-next driver-core/driver-core-linus linus/master v6.17-rc6 next-20250917]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Slawomir-Rosek/ACPI-DPTF-Ignore-SoC-DTS-thermal-while-scanning/20250917-201033
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rafael/linux-pm.git linux-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250917120719.2390847-2-srosek%40google.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 1/6] ACPI: DPTF: Ignore SoC DTS thermal while scanning
config: i386-randconfig-003-20250918 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250918/202509181359.fLTuROj6-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250918/202509181359.fLTuROj6-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202509181359.fLTuROj6-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/platform_temperature_control.c: In function 'ptc_mmio_show':
>> drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/platform_temperature_control.c:110:19: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq'; did you mean 'readl'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     110 |         reg_val = readq((void __iomem *) (proc_priv->mmio_base + data->offset));
         |                   ^~~~~
         |                   readl
   drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/platform_temperature_control.c: In function 'ptc_mmio_write':
>> drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/platform_temperature_control.c:142:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'writeq'; did you mean 'writel'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     142 |         writeq(reg_val, (void __iomem *) (proc_priv->mmio_base + offset));
         |         ^~~~~~
         |         writel
--
   drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/int340x_thermal_zone.c: In function 'int340x_thermal_read_trips':
>> drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/int340x_thermal_zone.c:72:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'thermal_acpi_critical_trip_temp'; did you mean 'thermal_zone_set_trip_temp'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
      72 |         ret = thermal_acpi_critical_trip_temp(zone_adev,
         |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |               thermal_zone_set_trip_temp
>> drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/int340x_thermal_zone.c:79:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'thermal_acpi_hot_trip_temp'; did you mean 'thermal_zone_set_trip_temp'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
      79 |         ret = thermal_acpi_hot_trip_temp(zone_adev,
         |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |               thermal_zone_set_trip_temp
>> drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/int340x_thermal_zone.c:86:15: error: implicit declaration of function 'thermal_acpi_passive_trip_temp'; did you mean 'thermal_zone_set_trip_temp'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
      86 |         ret = thermal_acpi_passive_trip_temp(zone_adev,
         |               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |               thermal_zone_set_trip_temp
>> drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/int340x_thermal_zone.c:94:23: error: implicit declaration of function 'thermal_acpi_active_trip_temp'; did you mean 'thermal_zone_set_trip_temp'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
      94 |                 ret = thermal_acpi_active_trip_temp(zone_adev, i,
         |                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
         |                       thermal_zone_set_trip_temp
--
   drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_power_floor.c: In function 'proc_thermal_read_power_floor_status':
>> drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_power_floor.c:42:18: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq'; did you mean 'readl'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
      42 |         status = readq(proc_priv->mmio_base + SOC_WT_RES_INT_STATUS_OFFSET);
         |                  ^~~~~
         |                  readl
   In file included from include/linux/bits.h:5,
                    from include/linux/ratelimit_types.h:5,
                    from include/linux/printk.h:9,
                    from include/asm-generic/bug.h:22,
                    from arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:103,
                    from include/linux/bug.h:5,
                    from include/linux/fortify-string.h:6,
                    from include/linux/string.h:382,
                    from include/linux/uuid.h:11,
                    from include/linux/mod_devicetable.h:14,
                    from include/linux/pci.h:27,
                    from drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_power_floor.c:29:
   include/vdso/bits.h:7:40: warning: left shift count >= width of type [-Wshift-count-overflow]
       7 | #define BIT(nr)                 (UL(1) << (nr))
         |                                        ^~
   drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_power_floor.c:32:41: note: in expansion of macro 'BIT'
      32 | #define SOC_POWER_FLOOR_STATUS          BIT(39)
         |                                         ^~~
   drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_power_floor.c:43:26: note: in expansion of macro 'SOC_POWER_FLOOR_STATUS'
      43 |         return (status & SOC_POWER_FLOOR_STATUS) >> SOC_POWER_FLOOR_SHIFT;
         |                          ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
--
   drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_wt_hint.c: In function 'workload_type_index_show':
>> drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_wt_hint.c:69:18: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq'; did you mean 'readl'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
      69 |         status = readq(proc_priv->mmio_base + SOC_WT_RES_INT_STATUS_OFFSET);
         |                  ^~~~~
         |                  readl
--
   drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device_pci.c: In function 'proc_thermal_clear_soc_int_status':
>> drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device_pci.c:145:18: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq'; did you mean 'readl'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     145 |         status = readq(proc_priv->mmio_base + SOC_WT_RES_INT_STATUS_OFFSET);
         |                  ^~~~~
         |                  readl
>> drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_device_pci.c:146:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'writeq'; did you mean 'writel'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     146 |         writeq(status & ~SOC_WT_RES_INT_STATUS_MASK,
         |         ^~~~~~
         |         writel
--
   drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_soc_slider.c: In function 'read_soc_slider':
>> drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_soc_slider.c:166:16: error: implicit declaration of function 'readq'; did you mean 'readl'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     166 |         return readq(proc_priv->mmio_base + SOC_POWER_SLIDER_OFFSET);
         |                ^~~~~
         |                readl
   drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_soc_slider.c: In function 'write_soc_slider':
>> drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/processor_thermal_soc_slider.c:171:9: error: implicit declaration of function 'writeq'; did you mean 'writel'? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
     171 |         writeq(val, proc_priv->mmio_base + SOC_POWER_SLIDER_OFFSET);
         |         ^~~~~~
         |         writel

Kconfig warnings: (for reference only)
   WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for INT340X_THERMAL
   Depends on [n]: THERMAL [=y] && (X86 [=y] || X86_INTEL_QUARK [=n] || COMPILE_TEST [=n]) && X86_64 [=n] && ACPI [=y] && PCI [=y] && NET [=y]
   Selected by [y]:
   - INTEL_SOC_DTS_THERMAL [=y] && THERMAL [=y] && (X86 [=y] || X86_INTEL_QUARK [=n] || COMPILE_TEST [=n]) && X86 [=y] && PCI [=y] && ACPI [=y]


vim +110 drivers/thermal/intel/int340x_thermal/platform_temperature_control.c

9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28   90  
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28   91  static ssize_t ptc_mmio_show(struct ptc_data *data, struct device *dev,
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28   92  			     struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf)
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28   93  {
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28   94  	struct pci_dev *pdev = to_pci_dev(dev);
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28   95  	struct proc_thermal_device *proc_priv;
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28   96  	const struct mmio_reg *mmio_regs;
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28   97  	int ret, units;
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28   98  	u64 reg_val;
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28   99  
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  100  	proc_priv = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  101  	mmio_regs = ptc_mmio_regs;
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  102  	ret = match_string(ptc_strings, -1, attr->attr.name);
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  103  	if (ret < 0)
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  104  		return ret;
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  105  
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  106  	units = mmio_regs[ret].units;
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  107  
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  108  	guard(mutex)(&ptc_lock);
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  109  
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28 @110  	reg_val = readq((void __iomem *) (proc_priv->mmio_base + data->offset));
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  111  	ret = (reg_val >> mmio_regs[ret].shift) & mmio_regs[ret].mask;
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  112  	if (units)
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  113  		ret *= units;
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  114  
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  115  	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", ret);
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  116  }
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  117  
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  118  #define PTC_SHOW(suffix)\
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  119  static ssize_t suffix##_show(struct device *dev,\
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  120  			     struct device_attribute *attr,\
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  121  			     char *buf)\
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  122  {\
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  123  	struct ptc_data *data = container_of(attr, struct ptc_data, suffix##_attr);\
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  124  	return ptc_mmio_show(data, dev, attr, buf);\
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  125  }
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  126  
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  127  static void ptc_mmio_write(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 offset, int index, u32 value)
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  128  {
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  129  	struct proc_thermal_device *proc_priv;
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  130  	u64 mask, reg_val;
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  131  
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  132  	proc_priv = pci_get_drvdata(pdev);
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  133  
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  134  	mask = GENMASK_ULL(ptc_mmio_regs[index].shift + ptc_mmio_regs[index].bits - 1,
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  135  			   ptc_mmio_regs[index].shift);
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  136  
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  137  	guard(mutex)(&ptc_lock);
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  138  
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  139  	reg_val = readq((void __iomem *) (proc_priv->mmio_base + offset));
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  140  	reg_val &= ~mask;
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  141  	reg_val |= (value << ptc_mmio_regs[index].shift);
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28 @142  	writeq(reg_val, (void __iomem *) (proc_priv->mmio_base + offset));
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  143  }
9befea30133ca4 Srinivas Pandruvada 2025-04-28  144  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-18  5:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-17 12:07 [PATCH v2 0/6] ACPI: DPTF: Move INT340X enumeration from DPTF core to thermal drivers Slawomir Rosek
2025-09-17 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 1/6] ACPI: DPTF: Ignore SoC DTS thermal while scanning Slawomir Rosek
2025-09-18  5:49   ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-09-23 12:16   ` Sławomir Rosek
2025-10-01 19:33     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2025-09-17 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 2/6] ACPI: DPTF: Move INT340X device IDs to header Slawomir Rosek
2025-09-17 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 3/6] ACPI: DPTF: Move PCH FIVR " Slawomir Rosek
2025-09-17 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 4/6] ACPI: DPTF: Remove not supported INT340X IDs Slawomir Rosek
2025-09-17 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 5/6] ACPI: platform: Add macro for acpi platform driver Slawomir Rosek
2025-09-17 12:07 ` [PATCH v2 6/6] ACPI: DPTF: Move INT340X enumeration to modules Slawomir Rosek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202509181359.fLTuROj6-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=acelan.kao@canonical.com \
    --cc=alexhung@gmail.com \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hansg@kernel.org \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mikrawczyk@google.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=skardach@google.com \
    --cc=srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=srosek@google.com \
    --cc=tnowicki@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.