All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	 Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>,
	Yi Lai <yi1.lai@intel.com>,
	 dongsheng <dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 4/5] KVM: selftests: Validate more arch-events in pmu_counters_test
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 17:45:11 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250919004512.1359828-5-seanjc@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250919004512.1359828-1-seanjc@google.com>

From: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>

Add support for 5 new architectural events (4 topdown level 1 metrics
events and LBR inserts event) that will first show up in Intel's
Clearwater Forest CPUs.  Detailed info about the new events can be found
in SDM section 21.2.7 "Pre-defined Architectural  Performance Events".

Signed-off-by: Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Yi Lai <yi1.lai@intel.com>
[sean: drop "unavailable_mask" changes]
Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/pmu.h       | 10 ++++++++++
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h |  7 ++++++-
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/pmu.c           |  5 +++++
 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c |  8 ++++++++
 4 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/pmu.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/pmu.h
index 3c10c4dc0ae8..2aabda2da002 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/pmu.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/pmu.h
@@ -61,6 +61,11 @@
 #define	INTEL_ARCH_BRANCHES_RETIRED		RAW_EVENT(0xc4, 0x00)
 #define	INTEL_ARCH_BRANCHES_MISPREDICTED	RAW_EVENT(0xc5, 0x00)
 #define	INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_SLOTS		RAW_EVENT(0xa4, 0x01)
+#define	INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_BE_BOUND		RAW_EVENT(0xa4, 0x02)
+#define	INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_BAD_SPEC		RAW_EVENT(0x73, 0x00)
+#define	INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_FE_BOUND		RAW_EVENT(0x9c, 0x01)
+#define	INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_RETIRING		RAW_EVENT(0xc2, 0x02)
+#define	INTEL_ARCH_LBR_INSERTS			RAW_EVENT(0xe4, 0x01)
 
 #define	AMD_ZEN_CORE_CYCLES			RAW_EVENT(0x76, 0x00)
 #define	AMD_ZEN_INSTRUCTIONS_RETIRED		RAW_EVENT(0xc0, 0x00)
@@ -80,6 +85,11 @@ enum intel_pmu_architectural_events {
 	INTEL_ARCH_BRANCHES_RETIRED_INDEX,
 	INTEL_ARCH_BRANCHES_MISPREDICTED_INDEX,
 	INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_SLOTS_INDEX,
+	INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_BE_BOUND_INDEX,
+	INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_BAD_SPEC_INDEX,
+	INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_FE_BOUND_INDEX,
+	INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_RETIRING_INDEX,
+	INTEL_ARCH_LBR_INSERTS_INDEX,
 	NR_INTEL_ARCH_EVENTS,
 };
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h
index efcc4b1de523..e8bad89fbb7f 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/include/x86/processor.h
@@ -265,7 +265,7 @@ struct kvm_x86_cpu_property {
 #define X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_GP_COUNTERS		KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xa, 0, EAX, 8, 15)
 #define X86_PROPERTY_PMU_GP_COUNTERS_BIT_WIDTH	KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xa, 0, EAX, 16, 23)
 #define X86_PROPERTY_PMU_EBX_BIT_VECTOR_LENGTH	KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xa, 0, EAX, 24, 31)
-#define X86_PROPERTY_PMU_EVENTS_MASK		KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xa, 0, EBX, 0, 7)
+#define X86_PROPERTY_PMU_EVENTS_MASK		KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xa, 0, EBX, 0, 12)
 #define X86_PROPERTY_PMU_FIXED_COUNTERS_BITMASK	KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xa, 0, ECX, 0, 31)
 #define X86_PROPERTY_PMU_NR_FIXED_COUNTERS	KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xa, 0, EDX, 0, 4)
 #define X86_PROPERTY_PMU_FIXED_COUNTERS_BIT_WIDTH	KVM_X86_CPU_PROPERTY(0xa, 0, EDX, 5, 12)
@@ -332,6 +332,11 @@ struct kvm_x86_pmu_feature {
 #define X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCH_INSNS_RETIRED		KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(EBX, 5)
 #define X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCHES_MISPREDICTED		KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(EBX, 6)
 #define X86_PMU_FEATURE_TOPDOWN_SLOTS			KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(EBX, 7)
+#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_TOPDOWN_BE_BOUND		KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(EBX, 8)
+#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_TOPDOWN_BAD_SPEC		KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(EBX, 9)
+#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_TOPDOWN_FE_BOUND		KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(EBX, 10)
+#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_TOPDOWN_RETIRING		KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(EBX, 11)
+#define X86_PMU_FEATURE_LBR_INSERTS			KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(EBX, 12)
 
 #define X86_PMU_FEATURE_INSNS_RETIRED_FIXED		KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(ECX, 0)
 #define X86_PMU_FEATURE_CPU_CYCLES_FIXED		KVM_X86_PMU_FEATURE(ECX, 1)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/pmu.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/pmu.c
index f31f0427c17c..5ab44bf54773 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/pmu.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/x86/pmu.c
@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@ const uint64_t intel_pmu_arch_events[] = {
 	INTEL_ARCH_BRANCHES_RETIRED,
 	INTEL_ARCH_BRANCHES_MISPREDICTED,
 	INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_SLOTS,
+	INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_BE_BOUND,
+	INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_BAD_SPEC,
+	INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_FE_BOUND,
+	INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_RETIRING,
+	INTEL_ARCH_LBR_INSERTS,
 };
 kvm_static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(intel_pmu_arch_events) == NR_INTEL_ARCH_EVENTS);
 
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c
index e805882bc306..baa7b8a2d459 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86/pmu_counters_test.c
@@ -75,6 +75,11 @@ static struct kvm_intel_pmu_event intel_event_to_feature(uint8_t idx)
 		[INTEL_ARCH_BRANCHES_RETIRED_INDEX]	 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCH_INSNS_RETIRED, X86_PMU_FEATURE_NULL },
 		[INTEL_ARCH_BRANCHES_MISPREDICTED_INDEX] = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_BRANCHES_MISPREDICTED, X86_PMU_FEATURE_NULL },
 		[INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_SLOTS_INDEX]	 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_TOPDOWN_SLOTS, X86_PMU_FEATURE_TOPDOWN_SLOTS_FIXED },
+		[INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_BE_BOUND_INDEX]	 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_TOPDOWN_BE_BOUND, X86_PMU_FEATURE_NULL },
+		[INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_BAD_SPEC_INDEX]	 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_TOPDOWN_BAD_SPEC, X86_PMU_FEATURE_NULL },
+		[INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_FE_BOUND_INDEX]	 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_TOPDOWN_FE_BOUND, X86_PMU_FEATURE_NULL },
+		[INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_RETIRING_INDEX]	 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_TOPDOWN_RETIRING, X86_PMU_FEATURE_NULL },
+		[INTEL_ARCH_LBR_INSERTS_INDEX]		 = { X86_PMU_FEATURE_LBR_INSERTS, X86_PMU_FEATURE_NULL },
 	};
 
 	kvm_static_assert(ARRAY_SIZE(__intel_event_to_feature) == NR_INTEL_ARCH_EVENTS);
@@ -171,9 +176,12 @@ static void guest_assert_event_count(uint8_t idx, uint32_t pmc, uint32_t pmc_msr
 		fallthrough;
 	case INTEL_ARCH_CPU_CYCLES_INDEX:
 	case INTEL_ARCH_REFERENCE_CYCLES_INDEX:
+	case INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_BE_BOUND_INDEX:
+	case INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_FE_BOUND_INDEX:
 		GUEST_ASSERT_NE(count, 0);
 		break;
 	case INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_SLOTS_INDEX:
+	case INTEL_ARCH_TOPDOWN_RETIRING_INDEX:
 		__GUEST_ASSERT(count >= NUM_INSNS_RETIRED,
 			       "Expected top-down slots >= %u, got count = %lu",
 			       NUM_INSNS_RETIRED, count);
-- 
2.51.0.470.ga7dc726c21-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-09-19  0:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-19  0:45 [PATCH v3 0/5] KVM: selftests: PMU fixes for GNR/SRF/CWF Sean Christopherson
2025-09-19  0:45 ` [PATCH v3 1/5] KVM: selftests: Add timing_info bit support in vmx_pmu_caps_test Sean Christopherson
2025-09-19  0:45 ` [PATCH v3 2/5] KVM: selftests: Track unavailable_mask for PMU events as 32-bit value Sean Christopherson
2025-09-19  5:43   ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-09-19 14:52     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-19  0:45 ` [PATCH v3 3/5] KVM: selftests: Reduce number of "unavailable PMU events" combos tested Sean Christopherson
2025-09-19  5:44   ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-09-19  0:45 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2025-09-19  0:45 ` [PATCH v3 5/5] KVM: selftests: Handle Intel Atom errata that leads to PMU event overcount Sean Christopherson
2025-09-19  5:49   ` Mi, Dapeng
2025-09-19 14:55     ` Sean Christopherson
2025-09-19 16:42       ` Sean Christopherson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250919004512.1359828-5-seanjc@google.com \
    --to=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=dapeng1.mi@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=dongsheng.x.zhang@intel.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=yi1.lai@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.