From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: victor.duicu@microchip.com, jic23@kernel.org,
dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org,
robh@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-iio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
marius.cristea@microchip.com, victor.duicu@microchip.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] iio: temperature: add support for MCP998X
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 14:59:52 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202509191411.ej3JBK3f-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250918111937.5150-3-victor.duicu@microchip.com>
Hi,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on 671b9b6d7f4fe17a174c410397e72253877ca64e]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/victor-duicu-microchip-com/dt-bindings-iio-temperature-add-support-for-MCP998X/20250918-192457
base: 671b9b6d7f4fe17a174c410397e72253877ca64e
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250918111937.5150-3-victor.duicu%40microchip.com
patch subject: [PATCH v5 2/2] iio: temperature: add support for MCP998X
config: loongarch-allyesconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250919/202509191411.ej3JBK3f-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 7c861bcedf61607b6c087380ac711eb7ff918ca6)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250919/202509191411.ej3JBK3f-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202509191411.ej3JBK3f-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from <built-in>:3:
In file included from include/linux/compiler_types.h:171:
include/linux/compiler-clang.h:28:9: warning: '__SANITIZE_ADDRESS__' macro redefined [-Wmacro-redefined]
28 | #define __SANITIZE_ADDRESS__
| ^
<built-in>:371:9: note: previous definition is here
371 | #define __SANITIZE_ADDRESS__ 1
| ^
>> drivers/iio/temperature/mcp9982.c:470:3: warning: label followed by a declaration is a C23 extension [-Wc23-extensions]
470 | u8 bulk_read[3];
| ^
drivers/iio/temperature/mcp9982.c:488:3: warning: label followed by a declaration is a C23 extension [-Wc23-extensions]
488 | unsigned long *src;
| ^
>> drivers/iio/temperature/mcp9982.c:493:4: warning: variable 'src' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
493 | *src = tmp_reg;
| ^~~
drivers/iio/temperature/mcp9982.c:488:21: note: initialize the variable 'src' to silence this warning
488 | unsigned long *src;
| ^
| = NULL
drivers/iio/temperature/mcp9982.c:741:2: warning: variable 'iio_idx' is uninitialized when used here [-Wuninitialized]
741 | iio_idx++;
| ^~~~~~~
drivers/iio/temperature/mcp9982.c:720:30: note: initialize the variable 'iio_idx' to silence this warning
720 | unsigned int reg_nr, iio_idx;
| ^
| = 0
5 warnings generated.
vim +470 drivers/iio/temperature/mcp9982.c
426
427 static int mcp9982_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
428 struct iio_chan_spec const *chan, int *val,
429 int *val2, long mask)
430 {
431 unsigned int tmp_reg, reg_status;
432 struct mcp9982_priv *priv = iio_priv(indio_dev);
433 int ret;
434
435 if (test_bit(RUN_STATE, &priv->bit_flags)) {
436 /*
437 * When working in Run mode, after modifying a parameter (like sampling
438 * frequency) we have to wait a delay before reading the new values.
439 * We can't determine when the conversion is done based on the BUSY bit.
440 */
441 if (test_bit(WAIT_BEFORE_READ, &priv->bit_flags)) {
442 if (!time_after(jiffies, priv->time_limit))
443 mdelay(jiffies_to_msecs(priv->time_limit - jiffies));
444 clear_bit(WAIT_BEFORE_READ, &priv->bit_flags);
445 }
446 } else {
447 ret = regmap_write(priv->regmap, MCP9982_ONE_SHOT_ADDR, 1);
448 if (ret)
449 return ret;
450 /*
451 * In Standby state after writing in OneShot register wait for
452 * the start of conversion and then poll the BUSY bit.
453 */
454 mdelay(125);
455 ret = regmap_read_poll_timeout(priv->regmap, MCP9982_STATUS_ADDR,
456 reg_status, !(reg_status & MCP9982_STATUS_BUSY),
457 mcp9982_delay_ms[priv->sampl_idx] * USEC_PER_MSEC,
458 0);
459 if (ret)
460 return ret;
461 }
462 guard(mutex)(&priv->lock);
463
464 switch (mask) {
465 case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
466 /*
467 * The Block Read Protocol first returns the number of user readable
468 * bytes, held in bulk_read[0], followed by the data.
469 */
> 470 u8 bulk_read[3];
471
472 ret = regmap_bulk_read(priv->regmap, MCP9982_TEMP_MEM_BLOCK_ADDR(chan->channel),
473 &bulk_read, sizeof(bulk_read));
474 if (ret)
475 return ret;
476
477 *val = (bulk_read[1] << 8) + (bulk_read[2]);
478 return IIO_VAL_INT;
479 case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
480 *val = 0;
481 *val2 = MCP9982_SCALE;
482 return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_NANO;
483 case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SAMP_FREQ:
484 *val = mcp9982_conv_rate[priv->sampl_idx][0];
485 *val2 = mcp9982_conv_rate[priv->sampl_idx][1];
486 return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
487 case IIO_CHAN_INFO_LOW_PASS_FILTER_3DB_FREQUENCY:
488 unsigned long *src;
489
490 ret = regmap_read(priv->regmap, MCP9982_RUNNING_AVG_ADDR, &tmp_reg);
491 if (ret)
492 return ret;
> 493 *src = tmp_reg;
494 *val = mcp9982_3db_values_map_tbl[priv->sampl_idx][bitmap_weight(src, 2)][0];
495 *val2 = mcp9982_3db_values_map_tbl[priv->sampl_idx][bitmap_weight(src, 2)][1];
496 return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
497 case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET:
498 *val = MCP9982_OFFSET;
499 return IIO_VAL_INT;
500 default:
501 return -EINVAL;
502 }
503 }
504
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-19 7:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-18 11:19 [PATCH v5 0/2] add support for MCP998X victor.duicu
2025-09-18 11:19 ` [PATCH v5 1/2] dt-bindings: iio: temperature: " victor.duicu
2025-09-18 14:56 ` Conor Dooley
2025-09-18 11:19 ` [PATCH v5 2/2] " victor.duicu
2025-09-19 6:27 ` kernel test robot
2025-09-20 10:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-19 6:59 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-09-20 10:55 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-24 12:47 ` Victor.Duicu
2025-09-27 15:25 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-09-20 11:42 ` [PATCH v5 0/2] " Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202509191411.ej3JBK3f-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marius.cristea@microchip.com \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=victor.duicu@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.