From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: James Clark <jjc@jclark.com>
Cc: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
Florian Fainelli <florian.fainelli@broadcom.com>,
Broadcom internal kernel review list
<bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@lunn.ch>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Vadim Fedorenko <vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev>,
Kory Maincent <kory.maincent@bootlin.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Yaroslav Kolomiiets <yrk@meta.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/3] broadcom: report the supported flags for ancillary features
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2025 17:04:45 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250919170445.45803d42@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250918-jk-fix-bcm-phy-supported-flags-v1-0-747b60407c9c@intel.com>
On Thu, 18 Sep 2025 17:33:15 -0700 Jacob Keller wrote:
> James Clark reported off list that the broadcom PHY PTP driver was
> incorrectly handling PTP_EXTTS_REQUEST and PTP_PEROUT_REQUEST ioctls since
> the conversion to the .supported_*_flags fields. This series fixes the
> driver to correctly report its flags through the .supported_perout_flags
> and .supported_extts_flags fields. It also contains an update to comment
> the behavior of the PTP_STRICT_FLAGS being always enabled for
> PTP_EXTTS_REQUEST2.
James, would you be willing to test and send an official Tested-by tag?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-20 0:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-19 0:33 [PATCH net 0/3] broadcom: report the supported flags for ancillary features Jacob Keller
2025-09-19 0:33 ` [PATCH net 1/3] broadcom: fix support for PTP_PEROUT_DUTY_CYCLE Jacob Keller
2025-09-19 11:02 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-09-19 0:33 ` [PATCH net 2/3] broadcom: fix support for PTP_EXTTS_REQUEST2 ioctl Jacob Keller
2025-09-19 11:03 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-09-19 0:33 ` [PATCH net 3/3] ptp: document behavior of PTP_STRICT_FLAGS Jacob Keller
2025-09-19 11:04 ` Vadim Fedorenko
2025-09-19 2:56 ` [PATCH net 0/3] broadcom: report the supported flags for ancillary features Richard Cochran
2025-09-19 8:39 ` Kory Maincent
2025-09-20 0:04 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-09-21 1:26 ` James Clark
2025-09-22 19:30 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250919170445.45803d42@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew@lunn.ch \
--cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=florian.fainelli@broadcom.com \
--cc=hkallweit1@gmail.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jjc@jclark.com \
--cc=kory.maincent@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=vadim.fedorenko@linux.dev \
--cc=yrk@meta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.