From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,zokeefe@google.com,ziy@nvidia.com,willy@infradead.org,ryan.roberts@arm.com,richard.weiyang@gmail.com,npache@redhat.com,lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com,liam.howlett@oracle.com,kas@kernel.org,hughd@google.com,david@redhat.com,baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com,baohua@kernel.org,anshuman.khandual@arm.com,dev.jain@arm.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-stable] mm-enable-khugepaged-anonymous-collapse-on-non-writable-regions.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2025 14:27:10 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250921212711.71F82C4CEE7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: mm: enable khugepaged anonymous collapse on non-writable regions
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
mm-enable-khugepaged-anonymous-collapse-on-non-writable-regions.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Subject: mm: enable khugepaged anonymous collapse on non-writable regions
Date: Mon, 8 Sep 2025 13:20:27 +0530
Patch series "Expand scope of khugepaged anonymous collapse", v2.
Currently khugepaged does not collapse an anonymous region which does not
have a single writable pte. This is wasteful since a region mapped with
non-writable ptes, for example, non-writable VMAs mapped by the
application, won't benefit from THP collapse.
An additional consequence of this constraint is that MADV_COLLAPSE does
not perform a collapse on a non-writable VMA, and this restriction is
nowhere to be found on the manpage - the restriction itself sounds wrong
to me since the user knows the protection of the memory it has mapped, so
collapsing read-only memory via madvise() should be a choice of the user
which shouldn't be overridden by the kernel.
Therefore, remove this constraint.
On an arm64 bare metal machine, comparing with vanilla 6.17-rc2, an
average of 5% improvement is seen on some mmtests benchmarks, particularly
hackbench, with a maximum improvement of 12%. In the following table, (I)
denotes statistically significant improvement, (R) denotes statistically
significant regression.
+-------------------------+--------------------------------+---------------+
| mmtests/hackbench | process-pipes-1 (seconds) | -0.06% |
| | process-pipes-4 (seconds) | -0.27% |
| | process-pipes-7 (seconds) | (I) -12.13% |
| | process-pipes-12 (seconds) | (I) -5.32% |
| | process-pipes-21 (seconds) | (I) -2.87% |
| | process-pipes-30 (seconds) | (I) -3.39% |
| | process-pipes-48 (seconds) | (I) -5.65% |
| | process-pipes-79 (seconds) | (I) -6.74% |
| | process-pipes-110 (seconds) | (I) -6.26% |
| | process-pipes-141 (seconds) | (I) -4.99% |
| | process-pipes-172 (seconds) | (I) -4.45% |
| | process-pipes-203 (seconds) | (I) -3.65% |
| | process-pipes-234 (seconds) | (I) -3.45% |
| | process-pipes-256 (seconds) | (I) -3.47% |
| | process-sockets-1 (seconds) | 2.13% |
| | process-sockets-4 (seconds) | 1.02% |
| | process-sockets-7 (seconds) | -0.26% |
| | process-sockets-12 (seconds) | -1.24% |
| | process-sockets-21 (seconds) | 0.01% |
| | process-sockets-30 (seconds) | -0.15% |
| | process-sockets-48 (seconds) | 0.15% |
| | process-sockets-79 (seconds) | 1.45% |
| | process-sockets-110 (seconds) | -1.64% |
| | process-sockets-141 (seconds) | (I) -4.27% |
| | process-sockets-172 (seconds) | 0.30% |
| | process-sockets-203 (seconds) | -1.71% |
| | process-sockets-234 (seconds) | -1.94% |
| | process-sockets-256 (seconds) | -0.71% |
| | thread-pipes-1 (seconds) | 0.66% |
| | thread-pipes-4 (seconds) | 1.66% |
| | thread-pipes-7 (seconds) | -0.17% |
| | thread-pipes-12 (seconds) | (I) -4.12% |
| | thread-pipes-21 (seconds) | (I) -2.13% |
| | thread-pipes-30 (seconds) | (I) -3.78% |
| | thread-pipes-48 (seconds) | (I) -5.77% |
| | thread-pipes-79 (seconds) | (I) -5.31% |
| | thread-pipes-110 (seconds) | (I) -6.12% |
| | thread-pipes-141 (seconds) | (I) -4.00% |
| | thread-pipes-172 (seconds) | (I) -3.01% |
| | thread-pipes-203 (seconds) | (I) -2.62% |
| | thread-pipes-234 (seconds) | (I) -2.00% |
| | thread-pipes-256 (seconds) | (I) -2.30% |
| | thread-sockets-1 (seconds) | (R) 2.39% |
+-------------------------+--------------------------------+---------------+
+-------------------------+------------------------------------------------+
| mmtests/sysbench-mutex | sysbenchmutex-1 (usec) | -0.02% |
| | sysbenchmutex-4 (usec) | -0.02% |
| | sysbenchmutex-7 (usec) | 0.00% |
| | sysbenchmutex-12 (usec) | 0.12% |
| | sysbenchmutex-21 (usec) | -0.40% |
| | sysbenchmutex-30 (usec) | 0.08% |
| | sysbenchmutex-48 (usec) | 2.59% |
| | sysbenchmutex-79 (usec) | -0.80% |
| | sysbenchmutex-110 (usec) | -3.87% |
| | sysbenchmutex-128 (usec) | (I) -4.46% |
+-------------------------+--------------------------------+---------------+
This patch (of 2):
Currently khugepaged does not collapse an anonymous region which does not
have a single writable pte. This is wasteful since a region mapped with
non-writable ptes, for example, non-writable VMAs mapped by the
application, won't benefit from THP collapse.
An additional consequence of this constraint is that MADV_COLLAPSE does
not perform a collapse on a non-writable VMA, and this restriction is
nowhere to be found on the manpage - the restriction itself sounds wrong
to me since the user knows the protection of the memory it has mapped, so
collapsing read-only memory via madvise() should be a choice of the user
which shouldn't be overridden by the kernel.
Therefore, remove this restriction by not honouring SCAN_PAGE_RO.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250908075028.38431-1-dev.jain@arm.com
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250908075028.38431-2-dev.jain@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>
Acked-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Zi Yan <ziy@nvidia.com>
Reviewed-by: Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Reviewed-by: Zach O'Keefe <zokeefe@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
Cc: Barry Song <baohua@kernel.org>
Cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>
Cc: Liam Howlett <liam.howlett@oracle.com>
Cc: Mariano Pache <npache@redhat.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox (Oracle) <willy@infradead.org>
Cc: Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
mm/khugepaged.c | 9 ++-------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
--- a/mm/khugepaged.c~mm-enable-khugepaged-anonymous-collapse-on-non-writable-regions
+++ a/mm/khugepaged.c
@@ -676,9 +676,7 @@ next:
writable = true;
}
- if (unlikely(!writable)) {
- result = SCAN_PAGE_RO;
- } else if (unlikely(cc->is_khugepaged && !referenced)) {
+ if (unlikely(cc->is_khugepaged && !referenced)) {
result = SCAN_LACK_REFERENCED_PAGE;
} else {
result = SCAN_SUCCEED;
@@ -1421,9 +1419,7 @@ static int hpage_collapse_scan_pmd(struc
mmu_notifier_test_young(vma->vm_mm, _address)))
referenced++;
}
- if (!writable) {
- result = SCAN_PAGE_RO;
- } else if (cc->is_khugepaged &&
+ if (cc->is_khugepaged &&
(!referenced ||
(unmapped && referenced < HPAGE_PMD_NR / 2))) {
result = SCAN_LACK_REFERENCED_PAGE;
@@ -2830,7 +2826,6 @@ handle_result:
case SCAN_PMD_NULL:
case SCAN_PTE_NON_PRESENT:
case SCAN_PTE_UFFD_WP:
- case SCAN_PAGE_RO:
case SCAN_LACK_REFERENCED_PAGE:
case SCAN_PAGE_NULL:
case SCAN_PAGE_COUNT:
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from dev.jain@arm.com are
mm-remove-pmd-alignment-constraint-in-execmem_vmalloc.patch
reply other threads:[~2025-09-21 21:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250921212711.71F82C4CEE7@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=kas@kernel.org \
--cc=liam.howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=npache@redhat.com \
--cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
--cc=zokeefe@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.