From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>
Cc: "Kasireddy, Vivek" <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
"dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org"
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org" <intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Logan Gunthorpe <logang@deltatee.com>,
"linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI/P2PDMA: Don't enforce ACS check for device functions of Intel GPUs
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 10:27:20 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250922132720.GY1391379@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fbb6bbe7-8141-4532-812e-2b93cc2fcb1b@amd.com>
On Mon, Sep 22, 2025 at 03:20:49PM +0200, Christian König wrote:
> At least on AMD GPUs when you want to have a DMA-buf for a specific
> part of the VFs resources then you ask the hypervisor driver
> managing the PF for that and not the VFIO driver.
Having a UAPI on the PF to give DMABUFs for arbitary VRAM seems
security exciting. I'd probably want to insist the calling process
prove to the PF driver that it also has access to the VF.
Having the VF create the DMABUF is one way to do that, but I imagine
there are other options.
But sure, if you can solve, or ignore, the security proof it makes a
lot more sense.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-22 13:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-15 7:21 [PATCH v4 0/5] drm/xe/sriov: Don't migrate dmabuf BO to System RAM if P2P check succeeds Vivek Kasireddy
2025-09-15 7:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] PCI/P2PDMA: Don't enforce ACS check for device functions of Intel GPUs Vivek Kasireddy
2025-09-15 15:33 ` Logan Gunthorpe
2025-09-16 17:34 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-09-16 17:59 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-16 17:57 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-18 6:16 ` Kasireddy, Vivek
2025-09-18 12:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-19 6:22 ` Kasireddy, Vivek
2025-09-19 12:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-22 6:59 ` Kasireddy, Vivek
2025-09-22 11:22 ` Christian König
2025-09-22 12:20 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-22 12:25 ` Christian König
2025-09-22 12:29 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-22 13:20 ` Christian König
2025-09-22 13:27 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-09-22 13:57 ` Christian König
2025-09-22 14:00 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-23 5:53 ` Kasireddy, Vivek
2025-09-23 6:25 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-23 6:44 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-23 7:52 ` Christian König
2025-09-23 12:15 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-23 12:45 ` Christian König
2025-09-23 13:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-23 13:28 ` Christian König
2025-09-23 13:38 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-23 13:48 ` Christian König
2025-09-23 23:02 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-24 8:29 ` Christian König
2025-09-24 6:50 ` Kasireddy, Vivek
2025-09-24 7:21 ` Christian König
2025-09-25 3:56 ` Kasireddy, Vivek
2025-09-25 10:51 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-09-25 11:28 ` Christian König
2025-09-25 13:11 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-09-25 13:33 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-25 15:40 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-09-25 15:55 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-26 6:12 ` Kasireddy, Vivek
2025-09-23 13:36 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-09-23 6:01 ` Kasireddy, Vivek
2025-09-22 12:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-24 16:13 ` Simon Richter
2025-09-24 17:12 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-25 4:06 ` Kasireddy, Vivek
2025-09-15 7:21 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] drm/xe/dmabuf: Don't migrate BO to System RAM if P2P check succeeds Vivek Kasireddy
2025-09-16 20:01 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-09-15 7:21 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] drm/xe/pf: Add a helper function to get a VF's backing object in LMEM Vivek Kasireddy
2025-09-16 19:58 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-16 20:06 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-09-17 7:10 ` Thomas Hellström
2025-09-15 7:21 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] drm/xe/bo: Create new dma_addr array for dmabuf BOs associated with VFs Vivek Kasireddy
2025-09-16 19:08 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-16 19:44 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-15 7:21 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] drm/xe/pt: Add an additional check for dmabuf BOs while doing bind Vivek Kasireddy
2025-09-16 19:13 ` Matthew Brost
2025-09-15 7:32 ` ✗ CI.checkpatch: warning for drm/xe/sriov: Don't migrate dmabuf BO to System RAM if P2P check succeeds Patchwork
2025-09-15 7:33 ` ✓ CI.KUnit: success " Patchwork
2025-09-15 8:16 ` ✓ Xe.CI.BAT: " Patchwork
2025-09-15 10:19 ` ✗ Xe.CI.Full: failure " Patchwork
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250922132720.GY1391379@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=logang@deltatee.com \
--cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
--cc=vivek.kasireddy@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.