From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: void@manifault.com, arighi@nvidia.com, changwoo@igalia.com
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, sched-ext@lists.linux.dev,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] sched_ext: Drop kf_cpu_valid()
Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2025 06:14:33 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250922161436.358949-5-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250922161436.358949-1-tj@kernel.org>
The intention behind kf_cpu_valid() was that when called from kfuncs,
kf_cpu_valid() would be able to implicitly determine the scx_sched instance
being operated on and thus wouldn't need @sch passed in explicitly. This
turned out to be unnecessarily complicated to implement and not have
justifiable practical benefits. Replace kf_cpu_valid() usages with
ops_cpu_valid() which takes explicit @sch.
Callers which don't have $sch available in the context are updated to read
$scx_root under RCU read lock, verify that it's not NULL and pass it in.
scx_bpf_cpu_rq() is restructured to use guard(rcu)() instead of explicit
rcu_read_[un]lock().
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
---
kernel/sched/ext.c | 67 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------
kernel/sched/ext_idle.c | 12 +++++---
2 files changed, 48 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 373146154829..56ca09f46d1e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -736,23 +736,6 @@ static bool ops_cpu_valid(struct scx_sched *sch, s32 cpu, const char *where)
}
}
-/**
- * kf_cpu_valid - Verify a CPU number, to be used on kfunc input args
- * @cpu: cpu number which came from a BPF ops
- * @where: extra information reported on error
- *
- * The same as ops_cpu_valid() but @sch is implicit.
- */
-static bool kf_cpu_valid(u32 cpu, const char *where)
-{
- if (__cpu_valid(cpu)) {
- return true;
- } else {
- scx_kf_error("invalid CPU %d%s%s", cpu, where ? " " : "", where ?: "");
- return false;
- }
-}
-
/**
* ops_sanitize_err - Sanitize a -errno value
* @sch: scx_sched to error out on error
@@ -5815,7 +5798,7 @@ static void scx_kick_cpu(struct scx_sched *sch, s32 cpu, u64 flags)
struct rq *this_rq;
unsigned long irq_flags;
- if (!kf_cpu_valid(cpu, NULL))
+ if (!ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
return;
local_irq_save(irq_flags);
@@ -6224,7 +6207,12 @@ __bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_dump_bstr(char *fmt, unsigned long long *data,
*/
__bpf_kfunc u32 scx_bpf_cpuperf_cap(s32 cpu)
{
- if (kf_cpu_valid(cpu, NULL))
+ struct scx_sched *sch;
+
+ guard(rcu)();
+
+ sch = rcu_dereference(scx_root);
+ if (likely(sch) && ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
return arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
else
return SCX_CPUPERF_ONE;
@@ -6246,7 +6234,12 @@ __bpf_kfunc u32 scx_bpf_cpuperf_cap(s32 cpu)
*/
__bpf_kfunc u32 scx_bpf_cpuperf_cur(s32 cpu)
{
- if (kf_cpu_valid(cpu, NULL))
+ struct scx_sched *sch;
+
+ guard(rcu)();
+
+ sch = rcu_dereference(scx_root);
+ if (likely(sch) && ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
return arch_scale_freq_capacity(cpu);
else
return SCX_CPUPERF_ONE;
@@ -6268,12 +6261,20 @@ __bpf_kfunc u32 scx_bpf_cpuperf_cur(s32 cpu)
*/
__bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_cpuperf_set(s32 cpu, u32 perf)
{
+ struct scx_sched *sch;
+
+ guard(rcu)();
+
+ sch = rcu_dereference(sch);
+ if (unlikely(!sch))
+ return;
+
if (unlikely(perf > SCX_CPUPERF_ONE)) {
scx_kf_error("Invalid cpuperf target %u for CPU %d", perf, cpu);
return;
}
- if (kf_cpu_valid(cpu, NULL)) {
+ if (ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL)) {
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu), *locked_rq = scx_locked_rq();
struct rq_flags rf;
@@ -6379,18 +6380,21 @@ __bpf_kfunc struct rq *scx_bpf_cpu_rq(s32 cpu)
{
struct scx_sched *sch;
- if (!kf_cpu_valid(cpu, NULL))
- return NULL;
+ guard(rcu)();
- rcu_read_lock();
sch = rcu_dereference(scx_root);
- if (likely(sch) && !sch->warned_deprecated_rq) {
+ if (unlikely(!sch))
+ return NULL;
+
+ if (!ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
+ return NULL;
+
+ if (!sch->warned_deprecated_rq) {
printk_deferred(KERN_WARNING "sched_ext: %s() is deprecated; "
"use scx_bpf_locked_rq() when holding rq lock "
"or scx_bpf_cpu_curr() to read remote curr safely.\n", __func__);
sch->warned_deprecated_rq = true;
}
- rcu_read_unlock();
return cpu_rq(cpu);
}
@@ -6425,8 +6429,17 @@ __bpf_kfunc struct rq *scx_bpf_locked_rq(void)
*/
__bpf_kfunc struct task_struct *scx_bpf_cpu_curr(s32 cpu)
{
- if (!kf_cpu_valid(cpu, NULL))
+ struct scx_sched *sch;
+
+ guard(rcu)();
+
+ sch = rcu_dereference(scx_root);
+ if (unlikely(!sch))
return NULL;
+
+ if (!ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
+ return NULL;
+
return rcu_dereference(cpu_rq(cpu)->curr);
}
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
index 6e2504ae7357..a576ec10522e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
@@ -864,7 +864,7 @@ static s32 select_cpu_from_kfunc(struct scx_sched *sch, struct task_struct *p,
struct rq_flags rf;
s32 cpu;
- if (!kf_cpu_valid(prev_cpu, NULL))
+ if (!ops_cpu_valid(sch, prev_cpu, NULL))
return -EINVAL;
if (!check_builtin_idle_enabled(sch))
@@ -923,9 +923,13 @@ static s32 select_cpu_from_kfunc(struct scx_sched *sch, struct task_struct *p,
*/
__bpf_kfunc int scx_bpf_cpu_node(s32 cpu)
{
- if (!kf_cpu_valid(cpu, NULL))
- return NUMA_NO_NODE;
+ struct scx_sched *sch;
+
+ guard(rcu)();
+ sch = rcu_dereference(scx_root);
+ if (unlikely(!sch) || !ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
+ return NUMA_NO_NODE;
return cpu_to_node(cpu);
}
@@ -1154,7 +1158,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc bool scx_bpf_test_and_clear_cpu_idle(s32 cpu)
if (!check_builtin_idle_enabled(sch))
return false;
- if (!kf_cpu_valid(cpu, NULL))
+ if (!ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
return false;
return scx_idle_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu);
--
2.51.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-22 16:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-22 16:14 [PATCHSET sched_ext/scx-misc-a] sched_ext: Add @sch parameter in preparation for multi-sched support Tejun Heo
2025-09-22 16:14 ` [PATCH 1/7] sched_ext: Separate out scx_kick_cpu() and add @sch to it Tejun Heo
2025-09-22 16:14 ` [PATCH 2/7] sched_ext: Add the @sch parameter to __bstr_format() Tejun Heo
2025-09-22 16:14 ` [PATCH 3/7] sched_ext: Add the @sch parameter to ext_idle helpers Tejun Heo
2025-09-22 16:14 ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2025-09-22 16:14 ` [PATCH 5/7] sched_ext: Add the @sch parameter to scx_dsq_insert_preamble/commit() Tejun Heo
2025-09-22 16:14 ` [PATCH 6/7] sched_ext: Drop scx_kf_exit() and scx_kf_error() Tejun Heo
2025-09-22 16:14 ` [PATCH 7/7] sched_ext: Misc updates around scx_sched instance pointer Tejun Heo
2025-09-23 8:36 ` Andrea Righi
2025-09-23 17:19 ` [PATCH v2 " Tejun Heo
2025-09-23 9:12 ` [PATCHSET sched_ext/scx-misc-a] sched_ext: Add @sch parameter in preparation for multi-sched support Andrea Righi
2025-09-23 19:13 ` Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250922161436.358949-5-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.