All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
Cc: will@kernel.org, robin.murphy@arm.com, joro@8bytes.org,
	jean-philippe@linaro.org, miko.lenczewski@arm.com,
	balbirs@nvidia.com, peterz@infradead.org, smostafa@google.com,
	kevin.tian@intel.com, praan@google.com,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, iommu@lists.linux.dev,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, patches@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH rfcv2 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add arm_smmu_invs based arm_smmu_domain_inv_range()
Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2025 18:56:13 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250924215613.GS2617119@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9ac8acbd289fa32378498f09f78e7924d3523200.1757373449.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com>

On Mon, Sep 08, 2025 at 04:27:01PM -0700, Nicolin Chen wrote:

Maybe:

Each smmu_domain now has an arm_smmu_invs that specifies the
invalidation steps to perform after any change the ioptes. This
includes basic ASID/VMID, the special case for nesting, and ATS.

Introduce a new arm_smmu_domain_inv helper iterating smmu_domain->invs,
to convert the invalidation array to commands. Any invalidation request
with no size specified means an entire flush over a range based one.

Take advantage of the sorted list to compatible batch same-SMMU
operations together. For instance ATS invaliations for multiple SIDs
can be pushed as a batch.

ATS invalidations must be completed before the driver disables ATS or
the device is permitted to ignore the racing invalidation and cause a
SMMU timeout. This sequencing is done with a rwlock where holding the
write side of the rwlock means there are no outstanding ATS
invalidations. If ATS is not used the rwlock is ignored, similar to
the existing code.

> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> index e4e0e066108cc..c73a94514c6d6 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.h
> @@ -675,9 +675,15 @@ struct arm_smmu_inv {
>  	refcount_t users; /* users=0 to mark as a trash to be purged */
>  };
>  
> +static inline bool arm_smmu_inv_is_ats(struct arm_smmu_inv *inv)
> +{
> +	return inv->type == INV_TYPE_ATS || inv->type == INV_TYPE_ATS_FULL;
> +}

I would put these has_ats related infrastructure hunks in the first
patch adding arm_smmu_invs

Jason


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-24 21:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-08 23:26 [PATCH rfcv2 0/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce an RCU-protected invalidation array Nicolin Chen
2025-09-08 23:26 ` [PATCH rfcv2 1/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Clear cmds->num after arm_smmu_cmdq_batch_submit Nicolin Chen
2025-09-09  3:16   ` Balbir Singh
2025-09-09  5:42     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-09 22:49       ` Balbir Singh
2025-09-10  2:03         ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-10  2:56   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-08 23:26 ` [PATCH rfcv2 2/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Explicitly set smmu_domain->stage for SVA Nicolin Chen
2025-09-09  3:25   ` Balbir Singh
2025-09-09 22:31   ` Balbir Singh
2025-09-10  2:06     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-24 21:07   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-08 23:26 ` [PATCH rfcv2 3/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add an inline arm_smmu_domain_free() Nicolin Chen
2025-09-24 21:08   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-08 23:26 ` [PATCH rfcv2 4/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce a per-domain arm_smmu_invs array Nicolin Chen
2025-09-09 13:01   ` kernel test robot
2025-09-20  0:26   ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-24 21:29   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-29 18:52     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-30 12:13       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-08 23:26 ` [PATCH rfcv2 5/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Pre-allocate a per-master invalidation array Nicolin Chen
2025-09-24 21:32   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-29 19:11     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-30 11:55       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-08 23:27 ` [PATCH rfcv2 6/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Populate smmu_domain->invs when attaching masters Nicolin Chen
2025-09-24 21:42   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-29 20:52     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-30 12:12       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-09-30 20:19         ` Nicolin Chen
2025-10-01 16:25           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-01 17:16             ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-08 23:27 ` [PATCH rfcv2 7/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Add arm_smmu_invs based arm_smmu_domain_inv_range() Nicolin Chen
2025-09-24 21:56   ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-09-29 21:00     ` Nicolin Chen
2025-09-08 23:27 ` [PATCH rfcv2 8/8] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Perform per-domain invalidations using arm_smmu_invs Nicolin Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250924215613.GS2617119@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=balbirs@nvidia.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jean-philippe@linaro.org \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miko.lenczewski@arm.com \
    --cc=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=praan@google.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=smostafa@google.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.