From: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
To: "Théo Lebrun" <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
Cc: Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
Harini Katakam <harini.katakam@xilinx.com>,
Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>,
Russell King <linux@armlinux.org.uk>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
Tawfik Bayouk <tawfik.bayouk@mobileye.com>,
Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v6 4/5] net: macb: single dma_alloc_coherent() for DMA descriptors
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2025 09:51:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250925085154.GW836419@horms.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250923-macb-fixes-v6-4-772d655cdeb6@bootlin.com>
On Tue, Sep 23, 2025 at 06:00:26PM +0200, Théo Lebrun wrote:
> Move from 2*NUM_QUEUES dma_alloc_coherent() for DMA descriptor rings to
> 2 calls overall.
>
> Issue is with how all queues share the same register for configuring the
> upper 32-bits of Tx/Rx descriptor rings. Taking Tx, notice how TBQPH
> does *not* depend on the queue index:
>
> #define GEM_TBQP(hw_q) (0x0440 + ((hw_q) << 2))
> #define GEM_TBQPH(hw_q) (0x04C8)
>
> queue_writel(queue, TBQP, lower_32_bits(queue->tx_ring_dma));
> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_DMA_ADDR_T_64BIT
> if (bp->hw_dma_cap & HW_DMA_CAP_64B)
> queue_writel(queue, TBQPH, upper_32_bits(queue->tx_ring_dma));
> #endif
>
> To maximise our chances of getting valid DMA addresses, we do a single
> dma_alloc_coherent() across queues. This improves the odds because
> alloc_pages() guarantees natural alignment. Other codepaths (IOMMU or
> dev/arch dma_map_ops) don't give high enough guarantees
> (even page-aligned isn't enough).
>
> Two consideration:
>
> - dma_alloc_coherent() gives us page alignment. Here we remove this
> constraint meaning each queue's ring won't be page-aligned anymore.
>
> - This can save some tiny amounts of memory. Fewer allocations means
> (1) less overhead (constant cost per alloc) and (2) less wasted bytes
> due to alignment constraints.
>
> Example for (2): 4 queues, default ring size (512), 64-bit DMA
> descriptors, 16K pages:
> - Before: 8 allocs of 8K, each rounded to 16K => 64K wasted.
> - After: 2 allocs of 32K => 0K wasted.
>
> Fixes: 02c958dd3446 ("net/macb: add TX multiqueue support for gem")
> Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson <sean.anderson@linux.dev>
> Acked-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>
> Tested-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com> # on sam9x75
> Signed-off-by: Théo Lebrun <theo.lebrun@bootlin.com>
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-25 8:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-23 16:00 [PATCH net v6 0/5] net: macb: various fixes Théo Lebrun
2025-09-23 16:00 ` [PATCH net v6 1/5] dt-bindings: net: cdns,macb: allow tsu_clk without tx_clk Théo Lebrun
2025-09-23 16:00 ` [PATCH net v6 2/5] net: macb: remove illusion about TBQPH/RBQPH being per-queue Théo Lebrun
2025-09-25 8:49 ` Simon Horman
2025-09-23 16:00 ` [PATCH net v6 3/5] net: macb: move ring size computation to functions Théo Lebrun
2025-09-25 8:51 ` Simon Horman
2025-09-23 16:00 ` [PATCH net v6 4/5] net: macb: single dma_alloc_coherent() for DMA descriptors Théo Lebrun
2025-09-25 8:51 ` Simon Horman [this message]
2025-09-23 16:00 ` [PATCH net v6 5/5] net: macb: avoid dealing with endianness in macb_set_hwaddr() Théo Lebrun
2025-09-25 8:52 ` Simon Horman
2025-09-26 7:56 ` [PATCH net v6 0/5] net: macb: various fixes Théo Lebrun
2025-09-26 20:40 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-14 15:38 ` Théo Lebrun
2025-09-27 1:06 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-09-27 1:10 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250925085154.GW836419@horms.kernel.org \
--to=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=claudiu.beznea@tuxon.dev \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=harini.katakam@xilinx.com \
--cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@armlinux.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=sean.anderson@linux.dev \
--cc=tawfik.bayouk@mobileye.com \
--cc=theo.lebrun@bootlin.com \
--cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.