All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
	andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev, eddyz87@gmail.com,
	song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev, kpsingh@kernel.org,
	sdf@fomichev.me, haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v6 2/3] selftests/bpf: Refactor stacktrace_map case with skeleton
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 01:50:29 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250925175030.1615837-2-chen.dylane@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250925175030.1615837-1-chen.dylane@linux.dev>

The loading method of the stacktrace_map test case looks too outdated,
refactor it with skeleton, and we can use global avariable feature in
the next patch.

Signed-off-by: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_map.c | 52 ++++++++-----------
 .../bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_map_raw_tp.c    |  2 +-
 ...test_stacktrace_map.c => stacktrace_map.c} |  0
 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-)
 rename tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/{test_stacktrace_map.c => stacktrace_map.c} (100%)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_map.c
index 84a7e405e91..0a79bf1d354 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_map.c
@@ -1,46 +1,38 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 #include <test_progs.h>
+#include "stacktrace_map.skel.h"
 
 void test_stacktrace_map(void)
 {
+	struct stacktrace_map *skel;
 	int control_map_fd, stackid_hmap_fd, stackmap_fd, stack_amap_fd;
-	const char *prog_name = "oncpu";
-	int err, prog_fd, stack_trace_len;
-	const char *file = "./test_stacktrace_map.bpf.o";
+	int err, stack_trace_len;
 	__u32 key, val, duration = 0;
-	struct bpf_program *prog;
-	struct bpf_object *obj;
-	struct bpf_link *link;
 
-	err = bpf_prog_test_load(file, BPF_PROG_TYPE_TRACEPOINT, &obj, &prog_fd);
-	if (CHECK(err, "prog_load", "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
+	skel = stacktrace_map__open_and_load();
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(skel, "skel_open_and_load"))
 		return;
 
-	prog = bpf_object__find_program_by_name(obj, prog_name);
-	if (CHECK(!prog, "find_prog", "prog '%s' not found\n", prog_name))
-		goto close_prog;
-
-	link = bpf_program__attach_tracepoint(prog, "sched", "sched_switch");
-	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_tp"))
-		goto close_prog;
-
 	/* find map fds */
-	control_map_fd = bpf_find_map(__func__, obj, "control_map");
+	control_map_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.control_map);
 	if (CHECK_FAIL(control_map_fd < 0))
-		goto disable_pmu;
+		goto out;
 
-	stackid_hmap_fd = bpf_find_map(__func__, obj, "stackid_hmap");
+	stackid_hmap_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.stackid_hmap);
 	if (CHECK_FAIL(stackid_hmap_fd < 0))
-		goto disable_pmu;
+		goto out;
 
-	stackmap_fd = bpf_find_map(__func__, obj, "stackmap");
+	stackmap_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.stackmap);
 	if (CHECK_FAIL(stackmap_fd < 0))
-		goto disable_pmu;
+		goto out;
 
-	stack_amap_fd = bpf_find_map(__func__, obj, "stack_amap");
+	stack_amap_fd = bpf_map__fd(skel->maps.stack_amap);
 	if (CHECK_FAIL(stack_amap_fd < 0))
-		goto disable_pmu;
+		goto out;
 
+	err = stacktrace_map__attach(skel);
+	if (!ASSERT_OK(err, "skel_attach"))
+		goto out;
 	/* give some time for bpf program run */
 	sleep(1);
 
@@ -55,21 +47,19 @@ void test_stacktrace_map(void)
 	err = compare_map_keys(stackid_hmap_fd, stackmap_fd);
 	if (CHECK(err, "compare_map_keys stackid_hmap vs. stackmap",
 		  "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
-		goto disable_pmu;
+		goto out;
 
 	err = compare_map_keys(stackmap_fd, stackid_hmap_fd);
 	if (CHECK(err, "compare_map_keys stackmap vs. stackid_hmap",
 		  "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
-		goto disable_pmu;
+		goto out;
 
 	stack_trace_len = PERF_MAX_STACK_DEPTH * sizeof(__u64);
 	err = compare_stack_ips(stackmap_fd, stack_amap_fd, stack_trace_len);
 	if (CHECK(err, "compare_stack_ips stackmap vs. stack_amap",
 		  "err %d errno %d\n", err, errno))
-		goto disable_pmu;
+		goto out;
 
-disable_pmu:
-	bpf_link__destroy(link);
-close_prog:
-	bpf_object__close(obj);
+out:
+	stacktrace_map__destroy(skel);
 }
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_map_raw_tp.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_map_raw_tp.c
index e0cb4697b4b..e985d51d3d4 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_map_raw_tp.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/stacktrace_map_raw_tp.c
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ void test_stacktrace_map_raw_tp(void)
 {
 	const char *prog_name = "oncpu";
 	int control_map_fd, stackid_hmap_fd, stackmap_fd;
-	const char *file = "./test_stacktrace_map.bpf.o";
+	const char *file = "./stacktrace_map.bpf.o";
 	__u32 key, val, duration = 0;
 	int err, prog_fd;
 	struct bpf_program *prog;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_stacktrace_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/stacktrace_map.c
similarity index 100%
rename from tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/test_stacktrace_map.c
rename to tools/testing/selftests/bpf/progs/stacktrace_map.c
-- 
2.48.1


  reply	other threads:[~2025-09-25 17:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-25 17:50 [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/3] bpf: Add lookup_and_delete_elem for BPF_MAP_STACK_TRACE Tao Chen
2025-09-25 17:50 ` Tao Chen [this message]
2025-09-25 23:18   ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 2/3] selftests/bpf: Refactor stacktrace_map case with skeleton Andrii Nakryiko
2025-09-25 17:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 3/3] selftests/bpf: Add stacktrace map lookup_and_delete_elem test case Tao Chen
2025-09-25 23:20 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/3] bpf: Add lookup_and_delete_elem for BPF_MAP_STACK_TRACE patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250925175030.1615837-2-chen.dylane@linux.dev \
    --to=chen.dylane@linux.dev \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
    --cc=haoluo@google.com \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=song@kernel.org \
    --cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.