Re: [PATCH net-next v3] netmem: replace __netmem_clear_lsb() with netmem_to_nmdesc()

[Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>]

On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 04:18:45PM +0100, Simon Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2025 at 12:54:23PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote:
> > Changes from RFC v2:
> >       1. Add a Reviewed-by tag (Thanks to Mina)
> >       2. Rebase on main branch as of Sep 22
> >
> > Changes from RFC:
> >       1. Optimize the implementation of netmem_to_nmdesc to use less
> >          instructions (feedbacked by Pavel)
> >
> > --->8---
> > >From 01d23fc4b20c369a2ecf29dc92319d55a4e63aa2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
> > Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2025 19:34:12 +0900
> > Subject: [PATCH net-next v3] netmem: replace __netmem_clear_lsb() with netmem_to_nmdesc()
> >
> > Now that we have struct netmem_desc, it'd better access the pp fields
> > via struct netmem_desc rather than struct net_iov.
> >
> > Introduce netmem_to_nmdesc() for safely converting netmem_ref to
> > netmem_desc regardless of the type underneath e.i. netmem_desc, net_iov.
> >
> > While at it, remove __netmem_clear_lsb() and make netmem_to_nmdesc()
> > used instead.
> >
> > Suggested-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@gmail.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul@sk.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Mina Almasry <almasrymina@google.com>
> 
> Hi Byungchul,
> 
> Some process issues from my side.
> 
> 1. The revision information, up to including the '--->8---' line above
>    should be below the scissors ('---') below.
> 
>    This is so that it is available to reviewers, appears in mailing
>    list archives, and so on. But is not included in git history.

Ah yes.  Thank you.  Lemme check.

> 2. Starting the patch description with a 'From: ' line is fine.
>    But 'Date:" and 'Subject:' lines don't belong there.
> 
>    Perhaps 1 and 2 are some sort of tooling error?
> 
> 3. Unfortunately while this patch is targeted at net-next,
>    it doesn't apply cleanly there.

I don't understand why.  Now I just rebased on the latest 'main' and it
works well.  What should I check else?

> When you repost, be sure to observe the 24h rule.

Thanks!

	Byungchul

> Link: https://docs.kernel.org/process/maintainer-netdev.html
> 
> --
> pw-bot: changes-requested
> 
> ...