From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@kernel.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Subject: [for-next][PATCH 11/11] tracing: Fix lock imbalance in s_start() memory allocation failure path
Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 13:01:46 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250930170303.049610095@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20250930170135.285740909@kernel.org
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
When s_start() fails to allocate memory for set_event_iter, it returns NULL
before acquiring event_mutex. However, the corresponding s_stop() function
always tries to unlock the mutex, causing a lock imbalance warning:
WARNING: bad unlock balance detected!
6.17.0-rc7-00175-g2b2e0c04f78c #7 Not tainted
-------------------------------------
syz.0.85611/376514 is trying to release lock (event_mutex) at:
[<ffffffff8dafc7a4>] traverse.part.0.constprop.0+0x2c4/0x650 fs/seq_file.c:131
but there are no more locks to release!
The issue was introduced by commit b355247df104 ("tracing: Cache ':mod:'
events for modules not loaded yet") which added the kzalloc() allocation before
the mutex lock, creating a path where s_start() could return without locking
the mutex while s_stop() would still try to unlock it.
Fix this by unconditionally acquiring the mutex immediately after allocation,
regardless of whether the allocation succeeded.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20250929113238.3722055-1-sashal@kernel.org
Fixes: b355247df104 ("tracing: Cache ":mod:" events for modules not loaded yet")
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (Google) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
kernel/trace/trace_events.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
index 9f3e9537417d..e00da4182deb 100644
--- a/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/trace_events.c
@@ -1629,11 +1629,10 @@ static void *s_start(struct seq_file *m, loff_t *pos)
loff_t l;
iter = kzalloc(sizeof(*iter), GFP_KERNEL);
+ mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
if (!iter)
return NULL;
- mutex_lock(&event_mutex);
-
iter->type = SET_EVENT_FILE;
iter->file = list_entry(&tr->events, struct trace_event_file, list);
--
2.50.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-09-30 17:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-30 17:01 [for-next][PATCH 00/11] tracing: Updates for v6.18 Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 01/11] tracing: Replace syscall RCU pointer assignment with READ/WRITE_ONCE() Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 02/11] tracing: Have syscall trace events show "0x" for values greater than 10 Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 03/11] tracing: Use vmalloc_array() to improve code Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 04/11] tracing/osnoise: Use for_each_online_cpu() instead of for_each_cpu() Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 05/11] tracing: Move buffer in trace_seq to end of struct Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 06/11] tracing: Remove redundant 0 value initialization Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 07/11] tracing: replace use of system_wq with system_percpu_wq Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 08/11] tracing/osnoise: Replace kmalloc() + copy_from_user() with memdup_user() Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 09/11] ftrace: Fix softlockup in ftrace_module_enable Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` [for-next][PATCH 10/11] tracing: Ensure optimized hashing works Steven Rostedt
2025-09-30 17:01 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250930170303.049610095@kernel.org \
--to=rostedt@kernel.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.