All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Luca Ceresoli <luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
	<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
	Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@ffwll.ch>,
	Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@intel.com>,
	Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>,
	Robert Foss <rfoss@kernel.org>,
	Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Jonas Karlman <jonas@kwiboo.se>,
	Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@gmail.com>,
	Hui Pu <Hui.Pu@gehealthcare.com>,
	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/7] drm/bridge: lock the encoder chain in scoped for_each loops
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 17:33:31 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251002173331.3d06d7d3@booty> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202509301358.38036b85-lkp@intel.com>

Hello,

On Tue, 30 Sep 2025 14:16:23 +0800
kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com> wrote:

> [  674.477504][    C1] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 626s! [swapper/0:1]
> [  674.477539][    C1] CPU#1 Utilization every 96s during lockup:
> [  674.477543][    C1] 	#1: 100% system,	  1% softirq,	  1% hardirq,	  0% idle
> [  674.477549][    C1] 	#2: 100% system,	  1% softirq,	  1% hardirq,	  0% idle
> [  674.477553][    C1] 	#3: 100% system,	  0% softirq,	  1% hardirq,	  0% idle
> [  674.477557][    C1] 	#4: 100% system,	  1% softirq,	  1% hardirq,	  0% idle
> [  674.477561][    C1] 	#5: 100% system,	  1% softirq,	  1% hardirq,	  0% idle
...
> [ 674.477713][ C1] drm_atomic_add_encoder_bridges (drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic.c:1319 (discriminator 1025)) 

The one reported is an actual bug, causing an infinite loop when the
encoder bridge chain is empty. Took a while to reproduce and debug, but
the fix is very simple:

 #define drm_for_each_bridge_in_chain_scoped(encoder, bridge)                           \
        for (struct drm_bridge *bridge __free(drm_bridge_encoder_chain_unlock) =        \
-                    list_first_entry(&drm_encoder_chain_lock(encoder)->bridge_chain,   \
+                    list_first_entry_or_null(&drm_encoder_chain_lock(encoder)->bridge_chain,   \

Fix queued for v2.

Luca

-- 
Luca Ceresoli, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-02 15:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-26 15:59 [PATCH 0/7] drm/bridge: protect encoder bridge chain with a mutex Luca Ceresoli
2025-09-26 15:59 ` [PATCH 1/7] drm/encoder: add mutex to protect the bridge chain Luca Ceresoli
2025-09-29 12:43   ` Maxime Ripard
2025-09-29 14:45     ` Luca Ceresoli
2025-09-26 15:59 ` [PATCH 2/7] drm/encoder: drm_encoder_cleanup: take chain mutex while tearing down Luca Ceresoli
2025-09-29 12:45   ` Maxime Ripard
2025-09-29 14:31     ` Luca Ceresoli
2025-10-03 10:37       ` Luca Ceresoli
2025-09-26 15:59 ` [PATCH 3/7] drm/bridge: lock the encoder bridge chain mutex during insertion Luca Ceresoli
2025-09-29 12:46   ` Maxime Ripard
2025-09-29 14:53     ` Luca Ceresoli
2025-09-26 15:59 ` [PATCH 4/7] drm/bridge: lock the encoder chain in scoped for_each loops Luca Ceresoli
2025-09-30  6:16   ` kernel test robot
2025-10-02 15:33     ` Luca Ceresoli [this message]
2025-09-26 15:59 ` [PATCH 5/7] drm/bridge: prevent encoder chain changes while iterating with list_for_each_entry_from() Luca Ceresoli
2025-09-26 15:59 ` [PATCH 6/7] drm/bridge: prevent encoder chain changes while iterating with list_for_each_entry_reverse() Luca Ceresoli
2025-09-26 15:59 ` [PATCH 7/7] drm/bridge: prevent encoder chain changes while iterating in drm_atomic_bridge_chain_post_disable/pre_enable() Luca Ceresoli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251002173331.3d06d7d3@booty \
    --to=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
    --cc=Hui.Pu@gehealthcare.com \
    --cc=Laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=airlied@gmail.com \
    --cc=andrzej.hajda@intel.com \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=jernej.skrabec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jonas@kwiboo.se \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=mripard@kernel.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
    --cc=rfoss@kernel.org \
    --cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.