From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>
Cc: "John Hubbard" <jhubbard@nvidia.com>,
"Alexandre Courbot" <acourbot@nvidia.com>,
"Joel Fernandes" <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
"Timur Tabi" <ttabi@nvidia.com>,
"Alistair Popple" <apopple@nvidia.com>,
"Zhi Wang" <zhiw@nvidia.com>, "Surath Mitra" <smitra@nvidia.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kwilczynski@kernel.org>,
"Miguel Ojeda" <ojeda@kernel.org>,
"Alex Gaynor" <alex.gaynor@gmail.com>,
"Boqun Feng" <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
"Gary Guo" <gary@garyguo.net>,
"Björn Roy Baron" <bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com>,
"Benno Lossin" <lossin@kernel.org>,
"Andreas Hindborg" <a.hindborg@kernel.org>,
"Alice Ryhl" <aliceryhl@google.com>,
"Trevor Gross" <tmgross@umich.edu>,
nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] rust: pci: skip probing VFs if driver doesn't support VFs
Date: Thu, 2 Oct 2025 20:40:10 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251002234010.GI3299207@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <DD85P4NV5B5Y.367RGWFHBR0RF@kernel.org>
On Thu, Oct 02, 2025 at 11:32:44PM +0200, Danilo Krummrich wrote:
> So, when we call pdev.physfn().drvdata_borrow::<NovaCore>() the checks are
> included already.
I'm not keen on hiding this reasoning inside an physfn() accessor like
this. ie one that returns a Device<Bound>. The reasoning for this is
tricky and special. We have enough cases where physfn won't be a bound
driver. I think it is big stretch just to declare that unconditionally
safe.
There is a reason pci_iov_get_pf_drvdata() has such a big comment..
So I'd rather see you follow the C design and have an explicit helper
function to convert a VF bound device to a PF bound device and check
the owner, basically split up pci_iov_get_pf_drvdata() into a part to
get the struct device and an inline to get the drvdata. Rust still has an
ops pointer it can pass in so it can be consistent with the C code
even if it does another check inside its drvdata_borrow.
This way we keep the reasoning and explanation in one place.
Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-02 23:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-02 2:00 [PATCH v2 0/2] rust: pci: don't probe() VFs in nova-core John Hubbard
2025-10-02 2:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] rust: pci: skip probing VFs if driver doesn't support VFs John Hubbard
2025-10-02 11:49 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 12:11 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 12:18 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 12:39 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 13:03 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 13:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 15:11 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 15:23 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 16:05 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 17:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 17:37 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 17:40 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 17:49 ` John Hubbard
2025-10-02 18:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 18:09 ` John Hubbard
2025-10-02 18:32 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 18:17 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 18:31 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 18:42 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 18:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 19:36 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 21:04 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 21:14 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 21:32 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 23:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-10-03 0:57 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-03 11:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 17:56 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-02 18:55 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-02 2:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] gpu: nova-core: declare that VFs are not (yet) supported John Hubbard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251002234010.GI3299207@nvidia.com \
--to=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=a.hindborg@kernel.org \
--cc=acourbot@nvidia.com \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.gaynor@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=aliceryhl@google.com \
--cc=apopple@nvidia.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bjorn3_gh@protonmail.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=jhubbard@nvidia.com \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=kwilczynski@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lossin@kernel.org \
--cc=nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=rust-for-linux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=smitra@nvidia.com \
--cc=tmgross@umich.edu \
--cc=ttabi@nvidia.com \
--cc=zhiw@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.