All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Coiby Xu <coxu@redhat.com>, linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Karel Srot <ksrot@redhat.com>, Mimi Zohar <zohar@linux.ibm.com>,
	Roberto Sassu <roberto.sassu@huawei.com>,
	Dmitry Kasatkin <dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com>,
	Eric Snowberg <eric.snowberg@oracle.com>,
	Paul Moore <paul@paul-moore.com>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	"Serge E. Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
	linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ima: Fall back to default kernel module signature verification
Date: Fri, 3 Oct 2025 01:17:30 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202510030029.VRKgik99-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250928030358.3873311-1-coxu@redhat.com>

Hi Coiby,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on cec1e6e5d1ab33403b809f79cd20d6aff124ccfe]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Coiby-Xu/ima-Fall-back-to-default-kernel-module-signature-verification/20250928-110501
base:   cec1e6e5d1ab33403b809f79cd20d6aff124ccfe
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250928030358.3873311-1-coxu%40redhat.com
patch subject: [PATCH] ima: Fall back to default kernel module signature verification
config: i386-randconfig-012-20251002 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251003/202510030029.VRKgik99-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-14 (Debian 14.2.0-19) 14.2.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251003/202510030029.VRKgik99-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510030029.VRKgik99-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   ld: security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.o: in function `ima_appraise_measurement':
>> security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c:587:(.text+0xbbb): undefined reference to `set_module_sig_enforced'


vim +587 security/integrity/ima/ima_appraise.c

   483	
   484	/*
   485	 * ima_appraise_measurement - appraise file measurement
   486	 *
   487	 * Call evm_verifyxattr() to verify the integrity of 'security.ima'.
   488	 * Assuming success, compare the xattr hash with the collected measurement.
   489	 *
   490	 * Return 0 on success, error code otherwise
   491	 */
   492	int ima_appraise_measurement(enum ima_hooks func, struct ima_iint_cache *iint,
   493				     struct file *file, const unsigned char *filename,
   494				     struct evm_ima_xattr_data *xattr_value,
   495				     int xattr_len, const struct modsig *modsig)
   496	{
   497		static const char op[] = "appraise_data";
   498		int audit_msgno = AUDIT_INTEGRITY_DATA;
   499		const char *cause = "unknown";
   500		struct dentry *dentry = file_dentry(file);
   501		struct inode *inode = d_backing_inode(dentry);
   502		enum integrity_status status = INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
   503		int rc = xattr_len;
   504		bool try_modsig = iint->flags & IMA_MODSIG_ALLOWED && modsig;
   505		bool enforce_module_sig = iint->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED && func == MODULE_CHECK;
   506	
   507		/* If not appraising a modsig or using default module verification, we need an xattr. */
   508		if (!(inode->i_opflags & IOP_XATTR) && !try_modsig && !enforce_module_sig)
   509			return INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN;
   510	
   511		/*
   512		 * Unlike any of the other LSM hooks where the kernel enforces file
   513		 * integrity, enforcing file integrity for the bprm_creds_for_exec()
   514		 * LSM hook with the AT_EXECVE_CHECK flag is left up to the discretion
   515		 * of the script interpreter(userspace). Differentiate kernel and
   516		 * userspace enforced integrity audit messages.
   517		 */
   518		if (is_bprm_creds_for_exec(func, file))
   519			audit_msgno = AUDIT_INTEGRITY_USERSPACE;
   520	
   521		/* If reading the xattr failed and there's no modsig or module verification, error out. */
   522		if (rc <= 0 && !try_modsig && !enforce_module_sig) {
   523			if (rc && rc != -ENODATA)
   524				goto out;
   525	
   526			if (iint->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) {
   527				if (iint->flags & IMA_VERITY_REQUIRED)
   528					cause = "verity-signature-required";
   529				else
   530					cause = "IMA-signature-required";
   531			} else {
   532				cause = "missing-hash";
   533			}
   534	
   535			status = INTEGRITY_NOLABEL;
   536			if (file->f_mode & FMODE_CREATED)
   537				iint->flags |= IMA_NEW_FILE;
   538			if ((iint->flags & IMA_NEW_FILE) &&
   539			    (!(iint->flags & IMA_DIGSIG_REQUIRED) ||
   540			     (inode->i_size == 0)))
   541				status = INTEGRITY_PASS;
   542			goto out;
   543		}
   544	
   545		status = evm_verifyxattr(dentry, XATTR_NAME_IMA, xattr_value,
   546					 rc < 0 ? 0 : rc);
   547		switch (status) {
   548		case INTEGRITY_PASS:
   549		case INTEGRITY_PASS_IMMUTABLE:
   550		case INTEGRITY_UNKNOWN:
   551			break;
   552		case INTEGRITY_NOXATTRS:	/* No EVM protected xattrs. */
   553			/* Fine to not have xattrs when using a modsig or default module verification. */
   554			if (try_modsig || enforce_module_sig)
   555				break;
   556			fallthrough;
   557		case INTEGRITY_NOLABEL:		/* No security.evm xattr. */
   558			cause = "missing-HMAC";
   559			goto out;
   560		case INTEGRITY_FAIL_IMMUTABLE:
   561			set_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags);
   562			cause = "invalid-fail-immutable";
   563			goto out;
   564		case INTEGRITY_FAIL:		/* Invalid HMAC/signature. */
   565			cause = "invalid-HMAC";
   566			goto out;
   567		default:
   568			WARN_ONCE(true, "Unexpected integrity status %d\n", status);
   569		}
   570	
   571		if (xattr_value)
   572			rc = xattr_verify(func, iint, xattr_value, xattr_len, &status,
   573					  &cause);
   574	
   575		/*
   576		 * If we have a modsig and either no imasig or the imasig's key isn't
   577		 * known, then try verifying the modsig.
   578		 */
   579		if (try_modsig &&
   580		    (!xattr_value || xattr_value->type == IMA_XATTR_DIGEST_NG ||
   581		     rc == -ENOKEY))
   582			rc = modsig_verify(func, modsig, &status, &cause);
   583	
   584		/* Fall back to default kernel module signature verification */
   585		if (rc && enforce_module_sig) {
   586			rc = 0;
 > 587			set_module_sig_enforced();
   588			/* CONFIG_MODULE_SIG may be disabled */
   589			if (is_module_sig_enforced()) {
   590				rc = 0;
   591				status = INTEGRITY_PASS;
   592				pr_debug("Fall back to default kernel module verification for %s\n", filename);
   593			}
   594		}
   595	
   596	out:
   597		/*
   598		 * File signatures on some filesystems can not be properly verified.
   599		 * When such filesystems are mounted by an untrusted mounter or on a
   600		 * system not willing to accept such a risk, fail the file signature
   601		 * verification.
   602		 */
   603		if ((inode->i_sb->s_iflags & SB_I_IMA_UNVERIFIABLE_SIGNATURE) &&
   604		    ((inode->i_sb->s_iflags & SB_I_UNTRUSTED_MOUNTER) ||
   605		     (iint->flags & IMA_FAIL_UNVERIFIABLE_SIGS))) {
   606			status = INTEGRITY_FAIL;
   607			cause = "unverifiable-signature";
   608			integrity_audit_msg(audit_msgno, inode, filename,
   609					    op, cause, rc, 0);
   610		} else if (status != INTEGRITY_PASS) {
   611			/* Fix mode, but don't replace file signatures. */
   612			if ((ima_appraise & IMA_APPRAISE_FIX) && !try_modsig &&
   613			    (!xattr_value ||
   614			     xattr_value->type != EVM_IMA_XATTR_DIGSIG)) {
   615				if (!ima_fix_xattr(dentry, iint))
   616					status = INTEGRITY_PASS;
   617			}
   618	
   619			/*
   620			 * Permit new files with file/EVM portable signatures, but
   621			 * without data.
   622			 */
   623			if (inode->i_size == 0 && iint->flags & IMA_NEW_FILE &&
   624			    test_bit(IMA_DIGSIG, &iint->atomic_flags)) {
   625				status = INTEGRITY_PASS;
   626			}
   627	
   628			integrity_audit_msg(audit_msgno, inode, filename,
   629					    op, cause, rc, 0);
   630		} else {
   631			ima_cache_flags(iint, func);
   632		}
   633	
   634		ima_set_cache_status(iint, func, status);
   635		return status;
   636	}
   637	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-10-02 17:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-09-28  3:03 [PATCH] ima: Fall back to default kernel module signature verification Coiby Xu
2025-09-30 13:57 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-09-30 20:28   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-16  3:46     ` Coiby Xu
2025-10-17  2:31       ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-17  3:19         ` Coiby Xu
2025-10-17 17:49           ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-17 23:19             ` Coiby Xu
2025-10-20 12:21               ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-20 12:45                 ` Roberto Sassu
2025-10-20 13:57                   ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-30  0:33                     ` Coiby Xu
2025-10-24 15:16                 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-30  0:31                   ` Coiby Xu
2025-10-30  3:01                     ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-30 13:42                       ` Coiby Xu
2025-10-30 16:50                         ` Mimi Zohar
2025-10-31  7:58                           ` Coiby Xu
2025-10-02 17:17 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-10-16  3:51   ` Coiby Xu
2025-10-31  7:40 ` [PATCH v2] lsm,ima: new LSM hook security_kernel_module_read_file to access decompressed kernel module Coiby Xu
2025-11-01 16:50   ` Paul Moore
2025-11-02 15:05     ` Mimi Zohar
2025-11-02 15:43       ` Paul Moore
2025-11-05  0:18         ` Coiby Xu
2025-11-05  2:47           ` Paul Moore
2025-11-05 14:07             ` Mimi Zohar
2025-11-05 15:42               ` Paul Moore
2025-11-05 20:25                 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-11-06 13:35                   ` Coiby Xu
2025-11-05 20:47           ` Mimi Zohar
2025-11-06 13:29             ` Coiby Xu
2025-11-06 22:15               ` Mimi Zohar
2025-11-07 19:28                 ` Mimi Zohar
2025-11-13  4:06                   ` Coiby Xu
2025-11-18 12:19                     ` Mimi Zohar
2025-11-19  3:52                       ` Coiby Xu
2025-11-19  3:47   ` [PATCH v3] ima: Access decompressed kernel module to verify appended signature Coiby Xu
2025-11-19 13:29     ` Mimi Zohar
2025-11-19 14:05       ` Coiby Xu
2025-11-19 14:03   ` [PATCH v4] " Coiby Xu
2025-11-19 15:29     ` Mimi Zohar

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202510030029.VRKgik99-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=coxu@redhat.com \
    --cc=dmitry.kasatkin@gmail.com \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=eric.snowberg@oracle.com \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=ksrot@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-integrity@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
    --cc=roberto.sassu@huawei.com \
    --cc=serge@hallyn.com \
    --cc=zohar@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.