All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Joachim Vandersmissen <git@jvdsn.com>
Cc: linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>,
	"Jason A . Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@oracle.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/crypto: Add FIPS pre-operational self-test for SHA algorithms
Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2025 20:27:06 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251007032706.GB77681@sol> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38ca063d-521a-4fc4-8398-5e77625533c4@jvdsn.com>

On Mon, Oct 06, 2025 at 10:03:44PM -0500, Joachim Vandersmissen wrote:
> Hi Eric,
> 
> It's a very minor change but I suggest not using "pre-operational
> self-test". That term specifically refers to a different type of self-test
> in FIPS 140-3 and it could lead to some confusion here. "cryptographic
> algorithm self-test" may be better (if you want to be formal), or just
> "self-test" or "known-answer test".
> 

I don't think that's quite correct.  FIPS 140-3 divides self-tests into
two categories, pre-operational (executed unconditionally at start-up
time) and conditional (executed only when conditions are met, such as an
algorithm being used for the first time).  This patch chooses the first
option, pre-operational.

We could just call them algorithm self-tests if we don't want to be
specific as to what time they run at, though.

- Eric

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-07  3:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-06 17:26 [PATCH] lib/crypto: Add FIPS pre-operational self-test for SHA algorithms Eric Biggers
2025-10-06 23:53 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-10-07  1:11   ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-07 17:52     ` Ard Biesheuvel
2025-10-10 23:31       ` Eric Biggers
2025-10-07  3:03 ` Joachim Vandersmissen
2025-10-07  3:27   ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2025-10-07  3:42     ` Joachim Vandersmissen
2025-10-10 18:51 ` kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251007032706.GB77681@sol \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=ardb@kernel.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=git@jvdsn.com \
    --cc=linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=vegard.nossum@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.