From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,pratyush@kernel.org,pasha.tatashin@soleen.com,jgg@nvidia.com,graf@amazon.com,chrisl@kernel.org,changyuanl@google.com,bhe@redhat.com,rppt@kernel.org,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: [merged mm-nonmm-stable] lib-test_kho-use-kho_preserve_vmalloc-instead-of-storing-addresses-in-fdt.patch removed from -mm tree
Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2025 13:49:26 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251007204926.CFE8FC4CEF1@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
The quilt patch titled
Subject: lib/test_kho: use kho_preserve_vmalloc instead of storing addresses in fdt
has been removed from the -mm tree. Its filename was
lib-test_kho-use-kho_preserve_vmalloc-instead-of-storing-addresses-in-fdt.patch
This patch was dropped because it was merged into the mm-nonmm-stable branch
of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
------------------------------------------------------
From: "Mike Rapoport (Microsoft)" <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: lib/test_kho: use kho_preserve_vmalloc instead of storing addresses in fdt
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2025 08:44:58 +0300
KHO test stores physical addresses of the preserved folios directly in
fdt. Use kho_preserve_vmalloc() instead of it and kho_restore_vmalloc()
to retrieve the addresses after kexec.
This makes the test more scalable from one side and adds tests coverage
for kho_preserve_vmalloc() from the other.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20250921054458.4043761-5-rppt@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport (Microsoft) <rppt@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Pratyush Yadav <pratyush@kernel.org>
Cc: Alexander Graf <graf@amazon.com>
Cc: Baoquan He <bhe@redhat.com>
Cc: Changyuan Lyu <changyuanl@google.com>
Cc: Chris Li <chrisl@kernel.org>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
Cc: Pasha Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@soleen.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
lib/test_kho.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
--- a/lib/test_kho.c~lib-test_kho-use-kho_preserve_vmalloc-instead-of-storing-addresses-in-fdt
+++ a/lib/test_kho.c
@@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ module_param(max_mem, long, 0644);
struct kho_test_state {
unsigned int nr_folios;
struct folio **folios;
+ phys_addr_t *folios_info;
struct folio *fdt;
__wsum csum;
};
@@ -67,18 +68,15 @@ static struct notifier_block kho_test_nb
static int kho_test_save_data(struct kho_test_state *state, void *fdt)
{
- phys_addr_t *folios_info;
+ phys_addr_t *folios_info __free(kvfree) = NULL;
+ struct kho_vmalloc folios_info_phys;
int err = 0;
- err |= fdt_begin_node(fdt, "data");
- err |= fdt_property(fdt, "nr_folios", &state->nr_folios,
- sizeof(state->nr_folios));
- err |= fdt_property_placeholder(fdt, "folios_info",
- state->nr_folios * sizeof(*folios_info),
- (void **)&folios_info);
- err |= fdt_property(fdt, "csum", &state->csum, sizeof(state->csum));
- err |= fdt_end_node(fdt);
+ folios_info = vmalloc_array(state->nr_folios, sizeof(*folios_info));
+ if (!folios_info)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ err = kho_preserve_vmalloc(folios_info, &folios_info_phys);
if (err)
return err;
@@ -93,6 +91,17 @@ static int kho_test_save_data(struct kho
break;
}
+ err |= fdt_begin_node(fdt, "data");
+ err |= fdt_property(fdt, "nr_folios", &state->nr_folios,
+ sizeof(state->nr_folios));
+ err |= fdt_property(fdt, "folios_info", &folios_info_phys,
+ sizeof(folios_info_phys));
+ err |= fdt_property(fdt, "csum", &state->csum, sizeof(state->csum));
+ err |= fdt_end_node(fdt);
+
+ if (!err)
+ state->folios_info = no_free_ptr(folios_info);
+
return err;
}
@@ -209,8 +218,9 @@ err_free_folios:
static int kho_test_restore_data(const void *fdt, int node)
{
+ const struct kho_vmalloc *folios_info_phys;
const unsigned int *nr_folios;
- const phys_addr_t *folios_info;
+ phys_addr_t *folios_info;
const __wsum *old_csum;
__wsum csum = 0;
int len;
@@ -225,8 +235,12 @@ static int kho_test_restore_data(const v
if (!old_csum || len != sizeof(*old_csum))
return -EINVAL;
- folios_info = fdt_getprop(fdt, node, "folios_info", &len);
- if (!folios_info || len != sizeof(*folios_info) * *nr_folios)
+ folios_info_phys = fdt_getprop(fdt, node, "folios_info", &len);
+ if (!folios_info_phys || len != sizeof(*folios_info_phys))
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ folios_info = kho_restore_vmalloc(folios_info_phys);
+ if (!folios_info)
return -EINVAL;
for (int i = 0; i < *nr_folios; i++) {
@@ -246,6 +260,8 @@ static int kho_test_restore_data(const v
folio_put(folio);
}
+ vfree(folios_info);
+
if (csum != *old_csum)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -304,6 +320,7 @@ static void kho_test_cleanup(void)
folio_put(kho_test_state.folios[i]);
kvfree(kho_test_state.folios);
+ vfree(kho_test_state.folios_info);
folio_put(kho_test_state.fdt);
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from rppt@kernel.org are
reply other threads:[~2025-10-07 20:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251007204926.CFE8FC4CEF1@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bhe@redhat.com \
--cc=changyuanl@google.com \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=graf@amazon.com \
--cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
--cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pasha.tatashin@soleen.com \
--cc=pratyush@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.