From: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] Improve error handling for qnap-mcu transfers
Date: Wed, 8 Oct 2025 16:57:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251008155752.GA8757@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250923160853.1925674-1-heiko@sntech.de>
On Tue, 23 Sep 2025, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Digging deeper into how that MCU behaves, I found out it can return
> more status codes than the "@0" for "ok".
>
> The additional codes can report a failed checksum verification and
> some "general" error for the command execution.
>
> This also explains sporadic command timeout messages, I have seen
> over time, when the controller sends an error code while we expect
> a longer reply from it.
>
> So while I'm not sure yet why it reports an error, with these changes
> we at least handle the error return code in a meaningful way.
>
>
> Heiko Stuebner (4):
> mfd: qnap-mcu: Calculate the checksum on the actual number of bytes
> received
> mfd: qnap-mcu: Use EPROTO in stead of EIO on checksum errors
> mfd: qnap-mcu: Move checksum verification to its own function
> mfd: qnap-mcu: Add proper error handling for command errors
>
> drivers/mfd/qnap-mcu.c | 55 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Note to self: patches 1-3 look good.
--
Lee Jones [李琼斯]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-08 15:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-09-23 16:08 [PATCH 0/4] Improve error handling for qnap-mcu transfers Heiko Stuebner
2025-09-23 16:08 ` [PATCH 1/4] mfd: qnap-mcu: Calculate the checksum on the actual number of bytes received Heiko Stuebner
2025-09-23 16:08 ` [PATCH 2/4] mfd: qnap-mcu: Use EPROTO in stead of EIO on checksum errors Heiko Stuebner
2025-09-23 16:08 ` [PATCH 3/4] mfd: qnap-mcu: Move checksum verification to its own function Heiko Stuebner
2025-09-23 16:08 ` [PATCH 4/4] mfd: qnap-mcu: Add proper error handling for command errors Heiko Stuebner
2025-10-08 15:54 ` Lee Jones
2025-10-08 15:57 ` Lee Jones [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251008155752.GA8757@google.com \
--to=lee@kernel.org \
--cc=heiko@sntech.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.