Re: [PATCH v2 03/10] dt-bindings: soc: samsung: gs101-pmu: allow power domains as children

[Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>]

On Thu, Oct 09, 2025 at 04:25:05PM +0100, André Draszik wrote:
> The power domains are a property of / implemented in the PMU. As such,
> they should be modelled as child nodes of the PMU.
> 
> Signed-off-by: André Draszik <andre.draszik@linaro.org>
> 
> ---
> Note: Ideally, the newly added properties (ranges, etc.) should only be
> 'required' if "^power-domain@[0-9a-f]+$" exists as a patternProperty,
> as they're needed only in that case. As-is, this patch now causes
> warnings for existing DTs as they don't specify the new properties (and
> they shouldn't need to). Only if DTs are updated to include
> power-domains, such an update should also add the new properties.
> 
> I've not been able to come up with the correct schema syntax to achieve
> that. dependencies, dependentRequired, and dependentSchemas don't seem
> to support patterns. Similarly,
>   - if:
>       required:
>         - ...
>     then:
>       required:
>         - ...
> 
> doesn't allow patterns in the 'if' block (or I didn't get the syntax
> right).

This is a known limitation in json-schema. Not sure if they've come up 
with a solution yet.

Rob