All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>,
	bpf@vger.kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net,
	martin.lau@kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, andrii@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: consistently use bpf_rcu_lock_held() everywhere
Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 22:24:41 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202510112101.pygcEmGf-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251010173021.3952776-1-andrii@kernel.org>

Hi Andrii,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Andrii-Nakryiko/bpf-consistently-use-bpf_rcu_lock_held-everywhere/20251011-013430
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251010173021.3952776-1-andrii%40kernel.org
patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: consistently use bpf_rcu_lock_held() everywhere
config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-001-20251011 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251011/202510112101.pygcEmGf-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-13 (Debian 13.3.0-16) 13.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251011/202510112101.pygcEmGf-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510112101.pygcEmGf-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from include/linux/workqueue.h:17,
                    from include/linux/bpf.h:11,
                    from include/linux/bpf_verifier.h:7,
                    from net/core/filter.c:21:
   include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h: In function 'bpf_local_storage_lookup':
>> include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h:149:39: error: implicit declaration of function 'bpf_rcu_lock_held'; did you mean 'rcu_read_lock_held'? [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
     149 |                                       bpf_rcu_lock_held());
         |                                       ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/rcupdate.h:399:53: note: in definition of macro 'RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN'
     399 |                 if (debug_lockdep_rcu_enabled() && (c) &&               \
         |                                                     ^
   include/linux/rcupdate.h:680:9: note: in expansion of macro '__rcu_dereference_check'
     680 |         __rcu_dereference_check((p), __UNIQUE_ID(rcu), \
         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h:148:17: note: in expansion of macro 'rcu_dereference_check'
     148 |         sdata = rcu_dereference_check(local_storage->cache[smap->cache_idx],
         |                 ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   cc1: some warnings being treated as errors


vim +149 include/linux/bpf_local_storage.h

450af8d0f6be2e KP Singh         2020-08-25  129  
c83597fa5dc6b3 Yonghong Song    2022-10-25  130  struct bpf_map *
c83597fa5dc6b3 Yonghong Song    2022-10-25  131  bpf_local_storage_map_alloc(union bpf_attr *attr,
08a7ce384e33e5 Martin KaFai Lau 2023-03-22  132  			    struct bpf_local_storage_cache *cache,
08a7ce384e33e5 Martin KaFai Lau 2023-03-22  133  			    bool bpf_ma);
450af8d0f6be2e KP Singh         2020-08-25  134  
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  135  void __bpf_local_storage_insert_cache(struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage,
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  136  				      struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  137  				      struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem);
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  138  /* If cacheit_lockit is false, this lookup function is lockless */
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  139  static inline struct bpf_local_storage_data *
450af8d0f6be2e KP Singh         2020-08-25  140  bpf_local_storage_lookup(struct bpf_local_storage *local_storage,
450af8d0f6be2e KP Singh         2020-08-25  141  			 struct bpf_local_storage_map *smap,
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  142  			 bool cacheit_lockit)
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  143  {
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  144  	struct bpf_local_storage_data *sdata;
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  145  	struct bpf_local_storage_elem *selem;
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  146  
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  147  	/* Fast path (cache hit) */
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  148  	sdata = rcu_dereference_check(local_storage->cache[smap->cache_idx],
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07 @149  				      bpf_rcu_lock_held());
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  150  	if (sdata && rcu_access_pointer(sdata->smap) == smap)
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  151  		return sdata;
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  152  
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  153  	/* Slow path (cache miss) */
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  154  	hlist_for_each_entry_rcu(selem, &local_storage->list, snode,
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  155  				  rcu_read_lock_trace_held())
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  156  		if (rcu_access_pointer(SDATA(selem)->smap) == smap)
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  157  			break;
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  158  
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  159  	if (!selem)
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  160  		return NULL;
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  161  	if (cacheit_lockit)
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  162  		__bpf_local_storage_insert_cache(local_storage, smap, selem);
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  163  	return SDATA(selem);
68bc61c26cacf1 Marco Elver      2024-02-07  164  }
450af8d0f6be2e KP Singh         2020-08-25  165  

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

      reply	other threads:[~2025-10-11 14:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-10 17:30 [PATCH bpf-next] bpf: consistently use bpf_rcu_lock_held() everywhere Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-11 14:24 ` kernel test robot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202510112101.pygcEmGf-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=andrii@kernel.org \
    --cc=ast@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.