From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: geliang@kernel.org,gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,kuba@kernel.org,matttbe@kernel.org,mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Cc: <stable-commits@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Patch "mptcp: pm: in-kernel: usable client side with C-flag" has been added to the 6.12-stable tree
Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2025 09:18:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025101732-devalue-jaws-06b3@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251016165656.940021-2-matttbe@kernel.org>
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
mptcp: pm: in-kernel: usable client side with C-flag
to the 6.12-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
mptcp-pm-in-kernel-usable-client-side-with-c-flag.patch
and it can be found in the queue-6.12 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
From stable+bounces-186178-greg=kroah.com@vger.kernel.org Thu Oct 16 18:57:55 2025
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 18:56:57 +0200
Subject: mptcp: pm: in-kernel: usable client side with C-flag
To: stable@vger.kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: MPTCP Upstream <mptcp@lists.linux.dev>, "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>, Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Message-ID: <20251016165656.940021-2-matttbe@kernel.org>
From: "Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)" <matttbe@kernel.org>
commit 4b1ff850e0c1aacc23e923ed22989b827b9808f9 upstream.
When servers set the C-flag in their MP_CAPABLE to tell clients not to
create subflows to the initial address and port, clients will likely not
use their other endpoints. That's because the in-kernel path-manager
uses the 'subflow' endpoints to create subflows only to the initial
address and port.
If the limits have not been modified to accept ADD_ADDR, the client
doesn't try to establish new subflows. If the limits accept ADD_ADDR,
the routing routes will be used to select the source IP.
The C-flag is typically set when the server is operating behind a legacy
Layer 4 load balancer, or using anycast IP address. Clients having their
different 'subflow' endpoints setup, don't end up creating multiple
subflows as expected, and causing some deployment issues.
A special case is then added here: when servers set the C-flag in the
MPC and directly sends an ADD_ADDR, this single ADD_ADDR is accepted.
The 'subflows' endpoints will then be used with this new remote IP and
port. This exception is only allowed when the ADD_ADDR is sent
immediately after the 3WHS, and makes the client switching to the 'fully
established' mode. After that, 'select_local_address()' will not be able
to find any subflows, because 'id_avail_bitmap' will be filled in
mptcp_pm_create_subflow_or_signal_addr(), when switching to 'fully
established' mode.
Fixes: df377be38725 ("mptcp: add deny_join_id0 in mptcp_options_received")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Closes: https://github.com/multipath-tcp/mptcp_net-next/issues/536
Reviewed-by: Geliang Tang <geliang@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250925-net-next-mptcp-c-flag-laminar-v1-1-ad126cc47c6b@kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
[ Conflict in pm.c, because commit 498d7d8b75f1 ("mptcp: pm: remove
'_nl' from mptcp_pm_nl_is_init_remote_addr") renamed an helper in the
context, and it is not in this version. The same new code can be
applied at the same place.
Conflict in pm_kernel.c, because the modified code has been moved from
pm_netlink.c to pm_kernel.c in commit 8617e85e04bd ("mptcp: pm: split
in-kernel PM specific code"), which is not in this version. The
resolution is easy: simply by applying the patch where 'pm_kernel.c'
has been replaced 'pm_netlink.c'. 'patch --merge' managed to apply
this modified patch without creating any conflicts. ]
Signed-off-by: Matthieu Baerts (NGI0) <matttbe@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
---
net/mptcp/pm.c | 7 ++++--
net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
net/mptcp/protocol.h | 8 +++++++
3 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/net/mptcp/pm.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm.c
@@ -226,9 +226,12 @@ void mptcp_pm_add_addr_received(const st
} else {
__MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net((struct sock *)msk), MPTCP_MIB_ADDADDRDROP);
}
- /* id0 should not have a different address */
+ /* - id0 should not have a different address
+ * - special case for C-flag: linked to fill_local_addresses_vec()
+ */
} else if ((addr->id == 0 && !mptcp_pm_nl_is_init_remote_addr(msk, addr)) ||
- (addr->id > 0 && !READ_ONCE(pm->accept_addr))) {
+ (addr->id > 0 && !READ_ONCE(pm->accept_addr) &&
+ !mptcp_pm_add_addr_c_flag_case(msk))) {
mptcp_pm_announce_addr(msk, addr, true);
mptcp_pm_add_addr_send_ack(msk);
} else if (mptcp_pm_schedule_work(msk, MPTCP_PM_ADD_ADDR_RECEIVED)) {
--- a/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/pm_netlink.c
@@ -674,10 +674,12 @@ static unsigned int fill_local_addresses
struct mptcp_addr_info mpc_addr;
struct pm_nl_pernet *pernet;
unsigned int subflows_max;
+ bool c_flag_case;
int i = 0;
pernet = pm_nl_get_pernet_from_msk(msk);
subflows_max = mptcp_pm_get_subflows_max(msk);
+ c_flag_case = remote->id && mptcp_pm_add_addr_c_flag_case(msk);
mptcp_local_address((struct sock_common *)msk, &mpc_addr);
@@ -690,12 +692,27 @@ static unsigned int fill_local_addresses
continue;
if (msk->pm.subflows < subflows_max) {
+ bool is_id0;
+
locals[i].addr = entry->addr;
locals[i].flags = entry->flags;
locals[i].ifindex = entry->ifindex;
+ is_id0 = mptcp_addresses_equal(&locals[i].addr,
+ &mpc_addr,
+ locals[i].addr.port);
+
+ if (c_flag_case &&
+ (entry->flags & MPTCP_PM_ADDR_FLAG_SUBFLOW)) {
+ __clear_bit(locals[i].addr.id,
+ msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap);
+
+ if (!is_id0)
+ msk->pm.local_addr_used++;
+ }
+
/* Special case for ID0: set the correct ID */
- if (mptcp_addresses_equal(&locals[i].addr, &mpc_addr, locals[i].addr.port))
+ if (is_id0)
locals[i].addr.id = 0;
msk->pm.subflows++;
@@ -704,6 +721,37 @@ static unsigned int fill_local_addresses
}
rcu_read_unlock();
+ /* Special case: peer sets the C flag, accept one ADD_ADDR if default
+ * limits are used -- accepting no ADD_ADDR -- and use subflow endpoints
+ */
+ if (!i && c_flag_case) {
+ unsigned int local_addr_max = mptcp_pm_get_local_addr_max(msk);
+
+ while (msk->pm.local_addr_used < local_addr_max &&
+ msk->pm.subflows < subflows_max) {
+ struct mptcp_pm_local *local = &locals[i];
+
+ if (!select_local_address(pernet, msk, local))
+ break;
+
+ __clear_bit(local->addr.id, msk->pm.id_avail_bitmap);
+
+ if (!mptcp_pm_addr_families_match(sk, &local->addr,
+ remote))
+ continue;
+
+ if (mptcp_addresses_equal(&local->addr, &mpc_addr,
+ local->addr.port))
+ continue;
+
+ msk->pm.local_addr_used++;
+ msk->pm.subflows++;
+ i++;
+ }
+
+ return i;
+ }
+
/* If the array is empty, fill in the single
* 'IPADDRANY' local address
*/
--- a/net/mptcp/protocol.h
+++ b/net/mptcp/protocol.h
@@ -1172,6 +1172,14 @@ static inline void mptcp_pm_close_subflo
spin_unlock_bh(&msk->pm.lock);
}
+static inline bool mptcp_pm_add_addr_c_flag_case(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
+{
+ return READ_ONCE(msk->pm.remote_deny_join_id0) &&
+ msk->pm.local_addr_used == 0 &&
+ mptcp_pm_get_add_addr_accept_max(msk) == 0 &&
+ msk->pm.subflows < mptcp_pm_get_subflows_max(msk);
+}
+
void mptcp_sockopt_sync_locked(struct mptcp_sock *msk, struct sock *ssk);
static inline struct mptcp_ext *mptcp_get_ext(const struct sk_buff *skb)
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from matttbe@kernel.org are
queue-6.12/mptcp-pm-in-kernel-usable-client-side-with-c-flag.patch
queue-6.12/selftests-mptcp-join-validate-c-flag-def-limit.patch
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-17 7:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-16 13:19 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: usable client side with C-flag" failed to apply to 6.12-stable tree gregkh
2025-10-16 16:56 ` [PATCH 6.12.y] mptcp: pm: in-kernel: usable client side with C-flag Matthieu Baerts (NGI0)
2025-10-17 7:18 ` gregkh [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025101732-devalue-jaws-06b3@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=geliang@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.