From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF1852727E0 for ; Sat, 18 Oct 2025 10:10:12 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760782215; cv=none; b=rId9A4/D0hKylSbEbMXGUKrzu+fwq+rv1MF2oTO4V+nA8lzd54efTPDK038p3p95z9z4BYRwpxwWXtunRhWd+uXuXSppgAfAjyNJj+ZAiw2x9c3WlP/qWe5sVPzKpUKrBRbdkUlwXt2DusPd3L7XYpn/xcAat4LojzT19ASR8ZY= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760782215; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5YYKchnGTBKNSMA25es0qRcpJGI6v8j2Bpc4Qxrk/GE=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=MH48nSTgshhghywCt2IdIjsDButPdDJwf2DvFoBoHHpXiyyQRngUjt3RSiD+imY98n6w5IVHrnI7uCv6cBhsHUqy+WbwcuU55Gjz5EEaBj0CwsAZV5c5x8ImWNZWIdf/u3Jm72vWeX02T46A/GXfavPyYe/hUNdMUAd4FPH0ya4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=MZoY/eXN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="MZoY/eXN" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1760782213; x=1792318213; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=5YYKchnGTBKNSMA25es0qRcpJGI6v8j2Bpc4Qxrk/GE=; b=MZoY/eXNZrTGRl0SEn0pmVknP1xbDJeS+Wa5OyFrhs36k56JLeaimTr4 Em2kurBazdSu6Navsp0Mwsb85nH+UGPDxvuAgtoy1UsB47OKs9D/elZ2R 5RiJBou0gHgOU22fFeJ0Z3w7GzGEtlHWvZEFHgSKMuzeOz1l22IU9PSvg piG1vxmNTQ6TKAupVs820bahAhO3vRH4DrnCZFwtWZ1ySIGzI7nUWGevS No2pWyavpbAPrZ202BKdPbcpas8dOza4/npZfL5J1rfySYu01MVYUopjd e2HXs92vImTz3GWYpumDhiuOFOd9+of7FkeaiJJumTQXP/erhi+7J3Xgn g==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: N+tzE06bQwSS5HipZ9PpVQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: wFOHKpg5TB6vxYAK3d0u4A== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11585"; a="74329596" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,238,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="74329596" Received: from orviesa004.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.144]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 18 Oct 2025 03:10:12 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: zFvmVnL7TgCXdU18acKvpQ== X-CSE-MsgGUID: g3YkONqkT1W8OruCq22f9w== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.19,238,1754982000"; d="scan'208";a="187185862" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 66d7546c76b2) ([10.239.97.151]) by orviesa004.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 18 Oct 2025 03:10:11 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 66d7546c76b2 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1vA3t3-0008DA-0H; Sat, 18 Oct 2025 10:10:09 +0000 Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 18:09:53 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: kernel@openeuler.org, Yang Yingliang Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: [openeuler:openEuler-1.0-LTS 1740/1740] mm/mem_reliable.c:126:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'reliable_limit_handler' was not declared. Should it be static? Message-ID: <202510181808.04lWorDM-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline tree: https://gitee.com/openeuler/kernel.git openEuler-1.0-LTS head: e98deea13d81cacd6479edf0de6267118ae7c639 commit: 1845e7add95773a24019fb72bbea24a0a568663b [1740/1740] mm: Add reliable memory use limit for user tasks config: arm64-randconfig-r121-20250729 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251018/202510181808.04lWorDM-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 15.1.0 reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251018/202510181808.04lWorDM-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510181808.04lWorDM-lkp@intel.com/ sparse warnings: (new ones prefixed by >>) >> mm/mem_reliable.c:126:5: sparse: sparse: symbol 'reliable_limit_handler' was not declared. Should it be static? mm/mem_reliable.c:126:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'reliable_limit_handler' [-Wmissing-prototypes] 126 | int reliable_limit_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ vim +/reliable_limit_handler +126 mm/mem_reliable.c 124 125 #ifdef CONFIG_SYSCTL > 126 int reliable_limit_handler(struct ctl_table *table, int write, 127 void __user *buffer, size_t *length, loff_t *ppos) 128 { 129 unsigned long old = task_reliable_limit; 130 int ret; 131 132 ret = proc_doulongvec_minmax(table, write, buffer, length, ppos); 133 if (ret == 0 && write) { 134 if (task_reliable_limit > total_reliable_mem_sz()) { 135 task_reliable_limit = old; 136 return -EINVAL; 137 } 138 } 139 140 return ret; 141 } 142 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki