From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Tao Chen <chen.dylane@linux.dev>
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, acme@kernel.org, namhyung@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com,
jolsa@kernel.org, irogers@google.com, adrian.hunter@intel.com,
kan.liang@linux.intel.com, song@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, martin.lau@linux.dev,
eddyz87@gmail.com, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] bpf: Use per-cpu BPF callchain entry to save callchain
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 13:03:03 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251020110303.GS3419281@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251019170118.2955346-3-chen.dylane@linux.dev>
On Mon, Oct 20, 2025 at 01:01:18AM +0800, Tao Chen wrote:
> As Alexei noted, get_perf_callchain() return values may be reused
> if a task is preempted after the BPF program enters migrate disable
> mode. Drawing on the per-cpu design of bpf_bprintf_buffers,
> per-cpu BPF callchain entry is used here.
And now you can only unwind 3 tasks, and then start failing. This is
acceptable, why?
> - if (may_fault)
> - rcu_read_lock(); /* need RCU for perf's callchain below */
> -
I know you propose to remove this code; but how was that correct? The
perf callchain code hard relies on non-preemptible context, RCU does not
imply such a thing.
> if (trace_in)
> trace = trace_in;
> - else if (kernel && task)
> trace = get_callchain_entry_for_task(task, max_depth);
> - else
> - trace = get_perf_callchain(regs, NULL, kernel, user, max_depth,
> - crosstask, false);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-21 17:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-19 17:01 [RFC PATCH bpf-next v3 0/2] Pass external callchain entry to get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
2025-10-19 17:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 1/2] perf: Use extern perf_callchain_entry for get_perf_callchain Tao Chen
2025-10-20 11:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2025-10-22 15:14 ` Tao Chen
2025-10-19 17:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/2] bpf: Use per-cpu BPF callchain entry to save callchain Tao Chen
2025-10-20 5:50 ` Tao Chen
2025-10-20 11:03 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2025-10-22 15:59 ` Tao Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251020110303.GS3419281@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chen.dylane@linux.dev \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.