From: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
Cc: yicongsrfy@163.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, davem@davemloft.net,
edumazet@google.com, kuba@kernel.org, linux-usb@vger.kernel.org,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, oliver@neukum.org, pabeni@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v5 2/3] net: usb: ax88179_178a: add USB device driver for config selection
Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 18:23:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251020182327.0dd8958a.michal.pecio@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e4ce396c-0047-4bd1-a5d2-aee3b86315b1@rowland.harvard.edu>
On Mon, 20 Oct 2025 11:56:50 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 18, 2025 at 05:56:18PM +0200, Michal Pecio wrote:
> > On Sat, 18 Oct 2025 11:36:11 -0400, Alan Stern wrote:
> > > How are prefer_vendor() and usb_driver_preferred() supposed to know
> > > which configuration is being considered?
> >
> > Currently they don't need to know, but this could be added by passing
> > a temporary struct with more stuff in place of udev.
> >
> > Really, this whole usb_drv->preferred business could be a simple
> > boolean flag, if not for r8152 needing to issue control transfers to
> > the chip to find whether it supports at all.
> >
> > It seems that ax88179_preferred() could simply always return true.
>
> Instead of all this preferred() stuff, why not have the ax88179 driver's
> probe routine check for a different configuration with a vendor-specific
> interface? If that other config is present and the chip is the right
> type then you can call usb_driver_set_configuration() -- this is exactly
> what it's meant for.
That could be doable and some code could be shared I guess, but how to
get the probe() routine to run in the first place?
The chip may be in other configuration, without this vendor interface.
If we remove _AND_INTERFACE_INFO, it's still a problem that cdc_ether
may already be bound to the CDC interface in CDC config.
Registering a *device* driver plows through such obstacles, because
core allows device drivers to immediately displace existing drivers.
It seems that this could work, if cdc_ether blacklisting and revert
of _AND_INTERFACE_INFO are applied as suggested in this series.
(But as part of the main commit, to avoid transient regressions).
I wonder if blacklisting is considered necessary evil? Without it, it's
possible that cdc_ether binds for a moment before it's kicked out by
the vendor driver. Looks weird in dmesg, at the very least.
FWIW, my RTL8153 is blacklisted in cdc_ether too. So much for the
promise that cfgselectors will allow users to choose drivers ;)
Regards,
Michal
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-20 16:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-11 7:53 [PATCH net v5 0/3] ax88179 driver optimization yicongsrfy
2025-10-11 7:53 ` [PATCH net v5 1/3] net: usb: support quirks in cdc_ncm yicongsrfy
2025-10-11 7:53 ` [PATCH net v5 2/3] net: usb: ax88179_178a: add USB device driver for config selection yicongsrfy
2025-10-13 9:07 ` Michal Pecio
2025-10-17 2:42 ` yicongsrfy
2025-10-17 13:10 ` Alan Stern
2025-10-17 17:15 ` Michal Pecio
2025-10-18 2:27 ` Alan Stern
2025-10-18 15:21 ` Michal Pecio
2025-10-18 15:36 ` Alan Stern
2025-10-18 15:56 ` Michal Pecio
2025-10-20 15:56 ` Alan Stern
2025-10-20 16:23 ` Michal Pecio [this message]
2025-10-20 16:59 ` Alan Stern
2025-10-21 9:13 ` Oliver Neukum
2025-10-21 16:33 ` Alan Stern
2025-10-22 7:58 ` Oliver Neukum
2025-10-22 14:28 ` Alan Stern
2025-10-21 2:29 ` Yi Cong
2025-10-21 2:59 ` Alan Stern
2025-10-21 6:26 ` Yi Cong
2025-10-21 16:26 ` Alan Stern
2025-10-20 9:59 ` Oliver Neukum
2025-10-20 10:48 ` Greg KH
2025-10-20 15:59 ` Michal Pecio
2025-10-21 9:02 ` Oliver Neukum
2025-10-20 10:27 ` Oliver Neukum
2025-10-11 7:53 ` [PATCH net v5 3/3] Revert "net: usb: ax88179_178a: Bind only to vendor-specific interface" yicongsrfy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251020182327.0dd8958a.michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--to=michal.pecio@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver@neukum.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=yicongsrfy@163.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.