From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 58F0BCCD1A2 for ; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 01:53:15 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To: From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=EugXNac9lB9Ukn2f6RLuamHfu3sMj8vRsZPtmESHgLA=; b=cxbQNh1VivuYVztB0X/Vjb2TKF XaOjvSN0Z/Lo309H7I+MWK8EzlqR953ZmoD6q65CsLxaKLcovVKLRXvq+Qa1IDo2bTikVVrRmsroT O1D14GwXSZe3euK6P7SsyZxjmMt/pPLdNnoUH8HosjvMlexfGioxeVLTe508rQ7vruz8ZAjypN0h9 s22571jmx7s+zIuHselIWs+dzABs8nhC0vfMihFJaeLopOkOKhjJMM8ESGS2QCR38abhOhNy2ddEw 5TpxmB0fmwjGZaardx5q+OiFdu20ag7PpjsS1mgEqw5UAxbGgOlgnsZBICn3HROhPwqcv7iXtcZXt bripd+BA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vB1Yh-0000000FVow-3oxs; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 01:53:07 +0000 Received: from tor.source.kernel.org ([2600:3c04:e001:324:0:1991:8:25]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vB1Yh-0000000FVoB-0D2y for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 01:53:07 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by tor.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28CBB62233; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 01:52:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DB1CC4CEFB; Tue, 21 Oct 2025 01:52:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1761011571; bh=DYZ+NvvXDV3GLpnrmo/lEqoRa29w7O428mCra33ZZ18=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=d7bFmOvYou2jVLWtmxieZwAGRgonwPmZSCPDWuIolmQx0M4Y5zhvniT/tOcwtn9RQ l2IhR3X6Al2Nb290zycAxVMwew6eXS1PI5Z67wY71A2YkQI/IfsttMCvOaqSkhvpF0 th8NqPcpgNXEvT3EQhfp9MjJxqybhWV9hzuelw2I0d4fsK75z09aGiVeF9Shcgta5Y msD9yFUVjqF4ApvAhN6aqAuh2zgN4AAYin+y4AI02O5nfP5FgIbPrDykx/5mseg/SY 8HriN8sx5C1HeVJBpPnNlXEY33sV04wvbvNoXZtFN0KhTuxSZjB7RrUAbb4fKtxFio Xvn8rrwWJU8Rg== Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 18:52:49 -0700 From: Jakub Kicinski To: Maxime Chevallier , Andrew Lunn , Russell King , Heiner Kallweit , Vladimir Oltean Cc: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, thomas.petazzoni@bootlin.com, Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Christophe Leroy , Herve Codina , Florian Fainelli , =?UTF-8?B?S8O2cnk=?= Maincent , Marek =?UTF-8?B?QmVow7pu?= , Oleksij Rempel , =?UTF-8?B?Tmljb2zDsg==?= Veronese , Simon Horman , mwojtas@chromium.org, Antoine Tenart , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Conor Dooley , Krzysztof Kozlowski , Rob Herring , Romain Gantois , Daniel Golle , Dimitri Fedrau Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v14 00/16] net: phy: Introduce PHY ports representation Message-ID: <20251020185249.32d93799@kernel.org> In-Reply-To: <20251013143146.364919-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> References: <20251013143146.364919-1-maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Mon, 13 Oct 2025 16:31:26 +0200 Maxime Chevallier wrote: > Hi everyone, > > Here is a V14 for the phy_port work, aiming at representing the > connectors and outputs of PHY devices. I can't help but read the lack of replies from PHY maintainers here as a tacit rejection. Not entirely sure what to do here. Should we discuss this at the netdev call tomorrow (8:30am PT)? Would any PHY maintainer be willing to share their opinion?