From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [ANN] netdev calls - Oct 21st
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 08:56:05 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251021085605.7fa4ab69@kernel.org> (raw)
Hi!
The usual calls took place today. I didn't send an announcement earlier
because I didn't expect topics.. then I realized the PHY port repr may
need a discussion. Luckily Andrew and Maxime joined in time.
Here are the meeting notes from what transpired, and meeting notes from
netdev TSC (today's and last months).
## netdev bi-weekly
Oct 2025 (21st)
* PHY port representation
* No major concerns so far, just general busy-ness
* Andrew to look after the weekend
* We’ll drop from patchwork given the timelines, Andrew promises to look regardless
## netdev foundation TSC
September 2025 (23rd)
Present: Paolo, Eric, Johannes, Jakub, Simon, Willem
HW lab:
* Funding approved by the board
* Trying to figure out the process for releasing funds
Small items:
* Unclear how to expense
* Google Folder has been shared by Linux Foundation
* Waiting for resolution for Plausible, hopefully CC number will be shared
Other items:
* #11 syzbot
* syzbot seems to be covering netlink pretty well, needs more
digging to find something that isn't covered
* should we close the issue?
#7 documentation
* is there a policy on accepting AI docs into the kernel?
#5 lore+lei
* Jakub to reach out to Konstantin
October 2025 (21st)
Present: Paolo, Andrew, Johannes, Kuniyuki, Simon, Eric, Jakub
Plausible
* https://plausible.io/netdev.bots.linux.dev
* Now paid by the foundation
HW lab:
* Order submitted for first few servers, no ETA, but maybe 1 month?
* Johannes: we need some understanding on how access to these machines will be granted
AI code review
* Chris Mason has a repo with AI prompts, trying to integrate with netdev
https://github.com/masoncl/review-prompts/blob/main/networking.md
* Tested on prior netdev patches, already live reviewing in BPF
* Should we email just the author first?
* Need a way to mark a review as known-bad
* Need a way to teach the AI new tricks - change Chris’s repo?
* Are the reviews going to show up in PW?
* Let’s start with just PW then, we’ll think about the ML and sending emails later
#12, #13, #14 (tests):
* Moving forwards with SoW, receiving quotes
* Do we need to wait for NIPA to be up?
* Probably not, the main use is for random drivers
* Timeline: likely completion around Feb
LPC update:
* Submissions under review
* Reviewers expected to finish by end of the day tomorrow
#5 lore+lei
* Discussion with K stalled, concerns about scalability
* Jakub to create a more concrete proposal and share
reply other threads:[~2025-10-21 15:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251021085605.7fa4ab69@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.