All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
To: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@kernel.org>
Cc: Benson Leung <bleung@chromium.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Danilo Krummrich <dakr@kernel.org>,
	Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
	linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@bgdev.pl>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>,
	Simona Vetter <simona.vetter@ffwll.ch>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/7] revocable: Add fops replacement
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2025 11:51:31 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251023145131.GI262900@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aPo6CZyT_IGWmu-O@tzungbi-laptop>

On Thu, Oct 23, 2025 at 10:22:01PM +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote:

> I was misunderstanding about the "sync" we were discussing for
> misc_deregister_sync().  The "sync", is analogous to synchronize_srcu()
> of revocable_provider_revoke() in the revocable version [1], doesn't wait
> for closing all opened files.

Yes, and my remark is we don't need to obfuscate simple locks in core
kernel code.

Jason

  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-23 14:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-16  5:41 [PATCH v5 0/7] platform/chrome: Fix a possible UAF via revocable Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-10-16  5:41 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] revocable: Revocable resource management Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-10-16  5:41 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] revocable: Add Kunit test cases Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-10-16  5:42 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] selftests: revocable: Add kselftest cases Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-10-16  5:42 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] platform/chrome: Protect cros_ec_device lifecycle with revocable Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-10-16  5:42 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] revocable: Add fops replacement Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-10-16 12:31   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-17  2:36     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-10-17 13:49       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-17 16:07         ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-10-17 16:21           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-19 15:08             ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-10-20 11:57               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-21  4:49                 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-10-21 12:15                   ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-23 14:22                     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-10-23 14:51                       ` Jason Gunthorpe [this message]
2025-10-23 15:04                         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-10-23 15:57                           ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-23 16:20                             ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-23 16:48                               ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-23 18:30                                 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-12-11  3:23                           ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-12-11  3:47                             ` Wolfram Sang
2025-12-11  8:05                               ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-12-11  8:36                                 ` Wolfram Sang
2025-12-11 13:43                                   ` Laurent Pinchart
2025-12-11 14:46                                     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-12-12  8:32                                       ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-11-07  4:11                     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-11-07 14:12                       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-17 16:29           ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-17 16:37             ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-17 18:19               ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-17 18:44                 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-17 21:41                   ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-17 22:56                     ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-23 15:32                       ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-10-16 18:38   ` Randy Dunlap
2025-10-17  2:41     ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-10-16  5:42 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] char: misc: Leverage revocable " Tzung-Bi Shih
2025-10-16  5:42 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] platform/chrome: cros_ec_chardev: Secure cros_ec_device via revocable Tzung-Bi Shih

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251023145131.GI262900@nvidia.com \
    --to=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=bleung@chromium.org \
    --cc=brgl@bgdev.pl \
    --cc=chrome-platform@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=dakr@kernel.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=simona.vetter@ffwll.ch \
    --cc=tzungbi@kernel.org \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.