From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: sgarzare@redhat.com,pabeni@redhat.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] vsock: fix lock inversion in vsock_assign_transport()" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2025 15:29:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2025102616-navy-creatable-7fad@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x f7c877e7535260cc7a21484c994e8ce7e8cb6780
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2025102616-navy-creatable-7fad@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From f7c877e7535260cc7a21484c994e8ce7e8cb6780 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 14:17:18 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] vsock: fix lock inversion in vsock_assign_transport()
Syzbot reported a potential lock inversion deadlock between
vsock_register_mutex and sk_lock-AF_VSOCK when vsock_linger() is called.
The issue was introduced by commit 687aa0c5581b ("vsock: Fix
transport_* TOCTOU") which added vsock_register_mutex locking in
vsock_assign_transport() around the transport->release() call, that can
call vsock_linger(). vsock_assign_transport() can be called with sk_lock
held. vsock_linger() calls sk_wait_event() that temporarily releases and
re-acquires sk_lock. During this window, if another thread hold
vsock_register_mutex while trying to acquire sk_lock, a circular
dependency is created.
Fix this by releasing vsock_register_mutex before calling
transport->release() and vsock_deassign_transport(). This is safe
because we don't need to hold vsock_register_mutex while releasing the
old transport, and we ensure the new transport won't disappear by
obtaining a module reference first via try_module_get().
Reported-by: syzbot+10e35716f8e4929681fa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Tested-by: syzbot+10e35716f8e4929681fa@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Fixes: 687aa0c5581b ("vsock: Fix transport_* TOCTOU")
Cc: mhal@rbox.co
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20251021121718.137668-1-sgarzare@redhat.com
Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
index 4c2db6cca557..76763247a377 100644
--- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
+++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c
@@ -487,12 +487,26 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
goto err;
}
- if (vsk->transport) {
- if (vsk->transport == new_transport) {
- ret = 0;
- goto err;
- }
+ if (vsk->transport && vsk->transport == new_transport) {
+ ret = 0;
+ goto err;
+ }
+ /* We increase the module refcnt to prevent the transport unloading
+ * while there are open sockets assigned to it.
+ */
+ if (!new_transport || !try_module_get(new_transport->module)) {
+ ret = -ENODEV;
+ goto err;
+ }
+
+ /* It's safe to release the mutex after a successful try_module_get().
+ * Whichever transport `new_transport` points at, it won't go away until
+ * the last module_put() below or in vsock_deassign_transport().
+ */
+ mutex_unlock(&vsock_register_mutex);
+
+ if (vsk->transport) {
/* transport->release() must be called with sock lock acquired.
* This path can only be taken during vsock_connect(), where we
* have already held the sock lock. In the other cases, this
@@ -512,20 +526,6 @@ int vsock_assign_transport(struct vsock_sock *vsk, struct vsock_sock *psk)
vsk->peer_shutdown = 0;
}
- /* We increase the module refcnt to prevent the transport unloading
- * while there are open sockets assigned to it.
- */
- if (!new_transport || !try_module_get(new_transport->module)) {
- ret = -ENODEV;
- goto err;
- }
-
- /* It's safe to release the mutex after a successful try_module_get().
- * Whichever transport `new_transport` points at, it won't go away until
- * the last module_put() below or in vsock_deassign_transport().
- */
- mutex_unlock(&vsock_register_mutex);
-
if (sk->sk_type == SOCK_SEQPACKET) {
if (!new_transport->seqpacket_allow ||
!new_transport->seqpacket_allow(remote_cid)) {
next reply other threads:[~2025-10-26 14:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-26 14:29 gregkh [this message]
2025-10-27 9:14 ` [PATCH 5.10.y] vsock: fix lock inversion in vsock_assign_transport() Stefano Garzarella
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2025102616-navy-creatable-7fad@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.