From: "Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
To: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, kvmarm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
dan.j.williams@intel.com, aik@amd.com, lukas@wunner.de,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@rivosinc.com>,
Xu Yilun <yilun.xu@linux.intel.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>,
Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Oliver Upton <oliver.upton@linux.dev>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH RESEND v2 06/12] coco: host: arm64: Add RMM device communication helpers
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 15:25:56 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251027095602.1154418-7-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251027095602.1154418-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
- add SMCCC IDs/wrappers for RMI_PDEV_COMMUNICATE/RMI_PDEV_ABORT
- describe the RMM device-communication ABI (struct rmi_dev_comm_*,
cache flags, protocol/object IDs, busy error code)
- track per-PF0 communication state (buffers, workqueue, cache metadata) and
serialize access behind object_lock
- plumb a DOE/SPDM worker (pdev_communicate_work) plus shared helpers that
submit the SMCCC call, cache multi-part responses, and handle retries/abort
- hook the new helpers into the physical function connect path so IDE
setup can drive the device to the expected state
Signed-off-by: Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_cmds.h | 20 ++
arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_smc.h | 63 ++++++
drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/arm-cca.c | 50 +++++
drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.c | 273 +++++++++++++++++++++++
drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.h | 63 ++++++
5 files changed, 469 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_cmds.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_cmds.h
index 4547ce0901a6..b86bf15afcda 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_cmds.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_cmds.h
@@ -536,4 +536,24 @@ static inline unsigned long rmi_pdev_get_state(unsigned long pdev_phys, enum rmi
return res.a0;
}
+static inline unsigned long rmi_pdev_communicate(unsigned long pdev_phys,
+ unsigned long pdev_comm_data_phys)
+{
+ struct arm_smccc_res res;
+
+ arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_PDEV_COMMUNICATE,
+ pdev_phys, pdev_comm_data_phys, &res);
+
+ return res.a0;
+}
+
+static inline unsigned long rmi_pdev_abort(unsigned long pdev_phys)
+{
+ struct arm_smccc_res res;
+
+ arm_smccc_1_1_invoke(SMC_RMI_PDEV_ABORT, pdev_phys, &res);
+
+ return res.a0;
+}
+
#endif /* __ASM_RMI_CMDS_H */
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_smc.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_smc.h
index 10f87a18f09a..53e46e24c921 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_smc.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/rmi_smc.h
@@ -47,6 +47,8 @@
#define SMC_RMI_RTT_INIT_RIPAS SMC_RMI_CALL(0x0168)
#define SMC_RMI_RTT_SET_RIPAS SMC_RMI_CALL(0x0169)
+#define SMC_RMI_PDEV_ABORT SMC_RMI_CALL(0x0174)
+#define SMC_RMI_PDEV_COMMUNICATE SMC_RMI_CALL(0x0175)
#define SMC_RMI_PDEV_CREATE SMC_RMI_CALL(0x0176)
#define SMC_RMI_PDEV_GET_STATE SMC_RMI_CALL(0x0178)
@@ -69,6 +71,7 @@
#define RMI_ERROR_REALM 2
#define RMI_ERROR_REC 3
#define RMI_ERROR_RTT 4
+#define RMI_BUSY 10
enum rmi_ripas {
RMI_EMPTY = 0,
@@ -361,4 +364,64 @@ struct rmi_pdev_params {
};
};
+#define RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_CACHE_REQ BIT(0)
+#define RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_CACHE_RSP BIT(1)
+#define RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_SEND BIT(2)
+#define RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_WAIT BIT(3)
+#define RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_RSP_RESET BIT(4)
+#define RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_MULTI BIT(5)
+
+#define RMI_DEV_COMM_NONE 0
+#define RMI_DEV_COMM_RESPONSE 1
+#define RMI_DEV_COMM_ERROR 2
+
+#define RMI_PROTOCOL_SPDM 0
+#define RMI_PROTOCOL_SECURE_SPDM 1
+
+#define RMI_DEV_VCA 0
+#define RMI_DEV_CERTIFICATE 1
+#define RMI_DEV_MEASUREMENTS 2
+#define RMI_DEV_INTERFACE_REPORT 3
+
+struct rmi_dev_comm_enter {
+ union {
+ u8 status;
+ u64 padding0;
+ };
+ u64 req_addr;
+ u64 resp_addr;
+ u64 resp_len;
+};
+
+struct rmi_dev_comm_exit {
+ u64 flags;
+ u64 req_cache_offset;
+ u64 req_cache_len;
+ u64 rsp_cache_offset;
+ u64 rsp_cache_len;
+ union {
+ u8 cache_obj_id;
+ u64 padding0;
+ };
+
+ union {
+ u8 protocol;
+ u64 padding1;
+ };
+ u64 req_delay;
+ u64 req_len;
+ u64 rsp_timeout;
+};
+
+struct rmi_dev_comm_data {
+ union { /* 0x0 */
+ struct rmi_dev_comm_enter enter;
+ u8 padding0[0x800];
+ };
+ union { /* 0x800 */
+ struct rmi_dev_comm_exit exit;
+ u8 padding1[0x800];
+ };
+};
+
#endif /* __ASM_RMI_SMC_H */
diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/arm-cca.c b/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/arm-cca.c
index 18e5bf6adea4..e79f05fee516 100644
--- a/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/arm-cca.c
+++ b/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/arm-cca.c
@@ -48,6 +48,7 @@ static struct pci_tsm *cca_tsm_pci_probe(struct tsm_dev *tsm_dev, struct pci_dev
rc = pci_tsm_pf0_constructor(pdev, &pf0_dsc->pci, tsm_dev);
if (rc)
return NULL;
+ mutex_init(&pf0_dsc->object_lock);
pci_dbg(pdev, "tsm enabled\n");
return &no_free_ptr(pf0_dsc)->pci.base_tsm;
@@ -70,6 +71,55 @@ static void cca_tsm_pci_remove(struct pci_tsm *tsm)
}
}
+static __maybe_unused int init_dev_communication_buffers(struct pci_dev *pdev,
+ struct cca_host_comm_data *comm_data)
+{
+ int ret = -ENOMEM;
+
+ comm_data->io_params = (struct rmi_dev_comm_data *)get_zeroed_page(GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!comm_data->io_params)
+ goto err_out;
+
+ comm_data->rsp_buff = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!comm_data->rsp_buff)
+ goto err_res_buff;
+
+ comm_data->req_buff = (void *)__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!comm_data->req_buff)
+ goto err_req_buff;
+
+ comm_data->work_queue = alloc_ordered_workqueue("%s %s DEV_COMM", 0,
+ dev_bus_name(&pdev->dev),
+ pci_name(pdev));
+ if (!comm_data->work_queue)
+ goto err_work_queue;
+
+ comm_data->io_params->enter.status = RMI_DEV_COMM_NONE;
+ comm_data->io_params->enter.resp_addr = virt_to_phys(comm_data->rsp_buff);
+ comm_data->io_params->enter.req_addr = virt_to_phys(comm_data->req_buff);
+ comm_data->io_params->enter.resp_len = 0;
+
+ return 0;
+
+err_work_queue:
+ free_page((unsigned long)comm_data->req_buff);
+err_req_buff:
+ free_page((unsigned long)comm_data->rsp_buff);
+err_res_buff:
+ free_page((unsigned long)comm_data->io_params);
+err_out:
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static inline void free_dev_communication_buffers(struct cca_host_comm_data *comm_data)
+{
+ destroy_workqueue(comm_data->work_queue);
+
+ free_page((unsigned long)comm_data->req_buff);
+ free_page((unsigned long)comm_data->rsp_buff);
+ free_page((unsigned long)comm_data->io_params);
+}
+
/* For now global for simplicity. Protected by pci_tsm_rwsem */
static DECLARE_BITMAP(cca_stream_ids, MAX_STREAM_ID);
diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.c b/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.c
index 390b8f05c7cf..592abe0dd252 100644
--- a/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.c
+++ b/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.c
@@ -5,6 +5,8 @@
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <linux/pci-ecam.h>
+#include <linux/pci-doe.h>
+#include <linux/delay.h>
#include <asm/rmi_cmds.h>
#include "rmi-da.h"
@@ -139,3 +141,274 @@ int pdev_create(struct pci_dev *pci_dev)
free_page((unsigned long)rmm_pdev);
return ret;
}
+
+static int doe_send_req_resp(struct pci_tsm *tsm)
+{
+ int ret, data_obj_type;
+ struct cca_host_comm_data *comm_data = to_cca_comm_data(tsm->pdev);
+ struct rmi_dev_comm_exit *io_exit = &comm_data->io_params->exit;
+ u8 protocol = io_exit->protocol;
+
+ if (protocol == RMI_PROTOCOL_SPDM)
+ data_obj_type = PCI_DOE_FEATURE_CMA;
+ else if (protocol == RMI_PROTOCOL_SECURE_SPDM)
+ data_obj_type = PCI_DOE_FEATURE_SSESSION;
+ else
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ /* delay the send */
+ if (io_exit->req_delay)
+ fsleep(io_exit->req_delay);
+
+ ret = pci_tsm_doe_transfer(tsm->dsm_dev, data_obj_type,
+ comm_data->req_buff, io_exit->req_len,
+ comm_data->rsp_buff, PAGE_SIZE);
+ return ret;
+}
+
+static inline bool pending_dev_communicate(struct rmi_dev_comm_exit *io_exit)
+{
+ bool pending = io_exit->flags & (RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_CACHE_REQ |
+ RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_CACHE_RSP |
+ RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_SEND |
+ RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_WAIT |
+ RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_MULTI);
+ return pending;
+}
+
+static int ___do_dev_communicate(enum dev_comm_type type, struct pci_tsm *tsm)
+{
+ int ret, nbytes, cp_len;
+ struct cache_object **cache_objp, *cache_obj;
+ struct cca_host_pf0_dsc *pf0_dsc = to_cca_pf0_dsc(tsm->dsm_dev);
+ struct cca_host_comm_data *comm_data = to_cca_comm_data(tsm->pdev);
+ struct rmi_dev_comm_enter *io_enter = &comm_data->io_params->enter;
+ struct rmi_dev_comm_exit *io_exit = &comm_data->io_params->exit;
+
+redo_communicate:
+
+ if (type == PDEV_COMMUNICATE)
+ ret = rmi_pdev_communicate(virt_to_phys(pf0_dsc->rmm_pdev),
+ virt_to_phys(comm_data->io_params));
+ else
+ ret = RMI_ERROR_INPUT;
+ if (ret != RMI_SUCCESS) {
+ if (ret == RMI_BUSY)
+ return -EBUSY;
+ return -ENXIO;
+ }
+
+ if (io_exit->flags & RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_CACHE_REQ ||
+ io_exit->flags & RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_CACHE_RSP) {
+
+ switch (io_exit->cache_obj_id) {
+ case RMI_DEV_VCA:
+ cache_objp = &pf0_dsc->vca;
+ break;
+ case RMI_DEV_CERTIFICATE:
+ cache_objp = &pf0_dsc->cert_chain.cache;
+ break;
+ default:
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ cache_obj = *cache_objp;
+ }
+
+ if (io_exit->flags & RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_CACHE_REQ)
+ cp_len = io_exit->req_cache_len;
+ else
+ cp_len = io_exit->rsp_cache_len;
+
+ /* response and request len should be <= SZ_4k */
+ if (cp_len > CACHE_CHUNK_SIZE)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ if (io_exit->flags & RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_CACHE_REQ ||
+ io_exit->flags & RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_CACHE_RSP) {
+ int cache_remaining;
+ struct cache_object *new_obj;
+
+ /* new allocation */
+ if (!cache_obj) {
+ cache_obj = kvmalloc(struct_size(cache_obj, buf, CACHE_CHUNK_SIZE),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!cache_obj)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+
+ cache_obj->size = CACHE_CHUNK_SIZE;
+ cache_obj->offset = 0;
+ *cache_objp = cache_obj;
+ }
+
+ cache_remaining = cache_obj->size - cache_obj->offset;
+ if (cp_len > cache_remaining) {
+
+ if (cache_obj->size + CACHE_CHUNK_SIZE > MAX_CACHE_OBJ_SIZE)
+ return -EINVAL;
+
+ new_obj = kvmalloc(struct_size(cache_obj, buf,
+ cache_obj->size + CACHE_CHUNK_SIZE),
+ GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!new_obj)
+ return -ENOMEM;
+ memcpy(new_obj, cache_obj, struct_size(cache_obj, buf, cache_obj->size));
+ new_obj->size = cache_obj->size + CACHE_CHUNK_SIZE;
+ *cache_objp = new_obj;
+ kvfree(cache_obj);
+ }
+
+ /* cache object can change above. */
+ cache_obj = *cache_objp;
+ }
+
+
+ if (io_exit->flags & RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_CACHE_REQ) {
+ memcpy(cache_obj->buf + cache_obj->offset,
+ (comm_data->req_buff + io_exit->req_cache_offset), io_exit->req_cache_len);
+ cache_obj->offset += io_exit->req_cache_len;
+ }
+
+ if (io_exit->flags & RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_CACHE_RSP) {
+ memcpy(cache_obj->buf + cache_obj->offset,
+ (comm_data->rsp_buff + io_exit->rsp_cache_offset), io_exit->rsp_cache_len);
+ cache_obj->offset += io_exit->rsp_cache_len;
+ }
+
+ /*
+ * wait for last packet request from RMM.
+ * We should not find this because our device communication is synchronous
+ */
+ if (io_exit->flags & RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_WAIT)
+ return -ENXIO;
+
+ /* next packet to send */
+ if (io_exit->flags & RMI_DEV_COMM_EXIT_SEND) {
+ nbytes = doe_send_req_resp(tsm);
+ if (nbytes < 0) {
+ /* report error back to RMM */
+ io_enter->status = RMI_DEV_COMM_ERROR;
+ } else {
+ /* send response back to RMM */
+ io_enter->resp_len = nbytes;
+ io_enter->status = RMI_DEV_COMM_RESPONSE;
+ }
+ } else {
+ /* no data transmitted => no data received */
+ io_enter->resp_len = 0;
+ io_enter->status = RMI_DEV_COMM_NONE;
+ }
+
+ if (pending_dev_communicate(io_exit))
+ goto redo_communicate;
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
+static int __do_dev_communicate(enum dev_comm_type type,
+ struct pci_tsm *tsm, unsigned long error_state)
+{
+ int ret;
+ int state;
+ struct rmi_dev_comm_enter *io_enter;
+ struct cca_host_pf0_dsc *pf0_dsc = to_cca_pf0_dsc(tsm->dsm_dev);
+
+ io_enter = &pf0_dsc->comm_data.io_params->enter;
+ io_enter->resp_len = 0;
+ io_enter->status = RMI_DEV_COMM_NONE;
+
+ ret = ___do_dev_communicate(type, tsm);
+ if (ret) {
+ if (type == PDEV_COMMUNICATE)
+ rmi_pdev_abort(virt_to_phys(pf0_dsc->rmm_pdev));
+
+ state = error_state;
+ } else {
+ /*
+ * Some device communication error will transition the
+ * device to error state. Report that.
+ */
+ if (type == PDEV_COMMUNICATE)
+ ret = rmi_pdev_get_state(virt_to_phys(pf0_dsc->rmm_pdev),
+ (enum rmi_pdev_state *)&state);
+ if (ret)
+ state = error_state;
+ }
+
+ if (state == error_state)
+ pci_err(tsm->pdev, "device communication error\n");
+
+ return state;
+}
+
+static int do_dev_communicate(enum dev_comm_type type, struct pci_tsm *tsm,
+ unsigned long target_state,
+ unsigned long error_state)
+{
+ int state;
+
+ do {
+ state = __do_dev_communicate(type, tsm, error_state);
+
+ if (state == target_state || state == error_state)
+ break;
+ } while (1);
+
+ return state;
+}
+
+static int do_pdev_communicate(struct pci_tsm *tsm, enum rmi_pdev_state target_state)
+{
+ return do_dev_communicate(PDEV_COMMUNICATE, tsm, target_state, RMI_PDEV_ERROR);
+}
+
+void pdev_communicate_work(struct work_struct *work)
+{
+ unsigned long state;
+ struct pci_tsm *tsm;
+ struct dev_comm_work *setup_work;
+ struct cca_host_pf0_dsc *pf0_dsc;
+
+ setup_work = container_of(work, struct dev_comm_work, work);
+ tsm = setup_work->tsm;
+ pf0_dsc = to_cca_pf0_dsc(tsm->dsm_dev);
+
+ guard(mutex)(&pf0_dsc->object_lock);
+ state = do_pdev_communicate(tsm, setup_work->target_state);
+ WARN_ON(state != setup_work->target_state);
+
+ complete(&setup_work->complete);
+}
+
+static int submit_pdev_comm_work(struct pci_dev *pdev, int target_state)
+{
+ int ret;
+ enum rmi_pdev_state state;
+ struct dev_comm_work comm_work;
+ struct cca_host_pf0_dsc *pf0_dsc = to_cca_pf0_dsc(pdev);
+ struct cca_host_comm_data *comm_data = to_cca_comm_data(pdev);
+
+ INIT_WORK_ONSTACK(&comm_work.work, pdev_communicate_work);
+ init_completion(&comm_work.complete);
+ comm_work.tsm = pdev->tsm;
+ comm_work.target_state = target_state;
+
+ queue_work(comm_data->work_queue, &comm_work.work);
+
+ wait_for_completion(&comm_work.complete);
+ destroy_work_on_stack(&comm_work.work);
+
+ /* check if we reached target state */
+ ret = rmi_pdev_get_state(virt_to_phys(pf0_dsc->rmm_pdev), &state);
+ if (ret)
+ return ret;
+
+ if (state != target_state)
+ /* no specific error for this */
+ return -1;
+ return 0;
+}
+
+int pdev_ide_setup(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+ return submit_pdev_comm_work(pdev, RMI_PDEV_NEEDS_KEY);
+}
diff --git a/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.h b/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.h
index 6764bf8d98ce..1d513e0b74d9 100644
--- a/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.h
+++ b/drivers/virt/coco/arm-cca-host/rmi-da.h
@@ -9,22 +9,68 @@
#include <linux/pci.h>
#include <linux/pci-ide.h>
#include <linux/pci-tsm.h>
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
#include <asm/rmi_smc.h>
+#define MAX_CACHE_OBJ_SIZE SZ_16M
+#define CACHE_CHUNK_SIZE SZ_4K
+struct cache_object {
+ int size;
+ int offset;
+ u8 buf[] __counted_by(size);
+};
+
+struct dev_comm_work {
+ struct pci_tsm *tsm;
+ int target_state;
+ struct work_struct work;
+ struct completion complete;
+};
+
+struct cca_host_comm_data {
+ void *rsp_buff;
+ void *req_buff;
+ struct rmi_dev_comm_data *io_params;
+ /*
+ * Only one device communication request can be active at
+ * a time. This limitation comes from using the DOE mailbox
+ * at the pdev level. Requests such as get_measurements may
+ * span multiple mailbox messages, which must not be
+ * interleaved with other SPDM requests.
+ */
+ struct workqueue_struct *work_queue;
+};
+
/* dsc = device security context */
struct cca_host_pf0_dsc {
+ struct cca_host_comm_data comm_data;
struct pci_tsm_pf0 pci;
struct pci_ide *sel_stream;
void *rmm_pdev;
int num_aux;
void *aux[MAX_PDEV_AUX_GRANULES];
+
+ struct mutex object_lock;
+ struct {
+ struct cache_object *cache;
+
+ void *public_key;
+ size_t public_key_size;
+
+ bool valid;
+ } cert_chain;
+ struct cache_object *vca;
};
struct cca_host_fn_dsc {
struct pci_tsm pci;
};
+enum dev_comm_type {
+ PDEV_COMMUNICATE = 0x1,
+};
+
static inline struct cca_host_pf0_dsc *to_cca_pf0_dsc(struct pci_dev *pdev)
{
struct pci_tsm *tsm = pdev->tsm;
@@ -42,5 +88,22 @@ static inline struct cca_host_fn_dsc *to_cca_fn_dsc(struct pci_dev *pdev)
return container_of(tsm, struct cca_host_fn_dsc, pci);
}
+static inline struct cca_host_comm_data *to_cca_comm_data(struct pci_dev *pdev)
+{
+ struct cca_host_pf0_dsc *pf0_dsc;
+
+ pf0_dsc = to_cca_pf0_dsc(pdev);
+ if (pf0_dsc)
+ return &pf0_dsc->comm_data;
+
+ pf0_dsc = to_cca_pf0_dsc(pdev->tsm->dsm_dev);
+ if (pf0_dsc)
+ return &pf0_dsc->comm_data;
+
+ return NULL;
+}
+
int pdev_create(struct pci_dev *pdev);
+void pdev_communicate_work(struct work_struct *work);
+int pdev_ide_setup(struct pci_dev *pdev);
#endif
--
2.43.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-27 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-27 9:55 [PATCH RESEND v2 00/12] coc: tsm: Implement ->connect()/->disconnect() callbacks for ARM CCA IDE setup Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-10-27 9:55 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 01/12] KVM: arm64: RMI: Export kvm_has_da_feature Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-10-29 16:39 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-27 9:55 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 02/12] firmware: smccc: coco: Manage arm-smccc platform device and CCA auxiliary drivers Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-10-29 16:52 ` Jonathan Cameron
2026-01-06 12:33 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-10-27 9:55 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 03/12] coco: guest: arm64: Drop dummy RSI platform device stub Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-10-29 16:54 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-27 9:55 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 04/12] coco: host: arm64: Add host TSM callback and IDE stream allocation support Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-10-29 17:18 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-27 9:55 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 05/12] coco: host: arm64: Build and register RMM pdev descriptors Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-10-29 17:37 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30 8:44 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-10-30 10:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-27 9:55 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) [this message]
2025-10-29 18:33 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 06/12] coco: host: arm64: Add RMM device communication helpers Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30 9:18 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-10-30 10:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30 14:04 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-10-30 18:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-30 16:20 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-10-30 18:12 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-31 8:04 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-10-31 12:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-27 9:55 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 07/12] coco: host: arm64: Add helper to stop and tear down an RMM pdev Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-10-29 18:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-27 9:55 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 08/12] coco: host: arm64: Instantiate RMM pdev during device connect Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-10-29 18:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-10-27 9:55 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 09/12] X.509: Make certificate parser public Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-10-27 9:56 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 10/12] X.509: Parse Subject Alternative Name in certificates Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-10-27 9:56 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 11/12] X.509: Move certificate length retrieval into new helper Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-10-27 9:56 ` [PATCH RESEND v2 12/12] coco: host: arm64: Register device public key with RMM Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2025-10-29 17:19 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2025-10-29 18:53 ` Jonathan Cameron
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251027095602.1154418-7-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--to=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
--cc=aik@amd.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=kvmarm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.upton@linux.dev \
--cc=sameo@rivosinc.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.