From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>,
HAN Yuwei <hrx@bupt.moe>, <linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org>,
<oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: [linus:master] [btrfs] b7fdfd29a1: postmark.transactions 9.5% regression
Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 15:41:27 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202510271449.efa21738-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed a 9.5% regression of postmark.transactions on:
commit: b7fdfd29a136a17c5c8ad9e9bbf89c48919c3d19 ("btrfs: only set the device specific options after devices are opened")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
we are in fact not sure what's the connection between this change and the
postmark.transactions performance. still report out due to below checks.
[still regression on linus/master 4bb1f7e19c4a1d6eeb52b80acff5ac63edd1b91d]
[regression chould be solved by reverting this commit on linus/master head]
[still regression on linux-next/master 72fb0170ef1f45addf726319c52a0562b6913707]
testcase: postmark
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4
compiler: gcc-14
test machine: 224 threads 4 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8380H CPU @ 2.90GHz (Cooper Lake) with 192G memory
parameters:
disk: 1HDD
fs: btrfs
fs1: nfsv4
number: 4000n
trans: 10000s
subdirs: 100d
cpufreq_governor: performance
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-lkp/202510271449.efa21738-lkp@intel.com
Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251027/202510271449.efa21738-lkp@intel.com
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/disk/fs1/fs/kconfig/number/rootfs/subdirs/tbox_group/testcase/trans:
gcc-14/performance/1HDD/nfsv4/btrfs/x86_64-rhel-9.4/4000n/debian-13-x86_64-20250902.cgz/100d/lkp-cpl-4sp2/postmark/10000s
commit:
53a4acbfc1 ("btrfs: fix memory leak on duplicated memory in the qgroup assign ioctl")
b7fdfd29a1 ("btrfs: only set the device specific options after devices are opened")
53a4acbfc1de85fa b7fdfd29a136a17c5c8ad9e9bbf
---------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
2010 +10.5% 2222 nfsstat.Client.nfs.v4.open_noat
97983 ± 11% +18.5% 116101 numa-numastat.node1.other_node
97983 ± 11% +18.5% 116101 numa-vmstat.node1.numa_other
16001 ± 5% -7.5% 14797 ± 5% sched_debug.cfs_rq:/.load.avg
1474354 ± 3% +9.9% 1620281 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu.avg_idle.avg
756151 ± 3% +10.0% 831539 ± 4% sched_debug.cpu.max_idle_balance_cost.avg
3585 -2.6% 3490 perf-stat.i.context-switches
6141 ± 2% +4.0% 6385 perf-stat.i.cycles-between-cache-misses
5796 ± 2% +3.9% 6024 perf-stat.overall.cycles-between-cache-misses
3580 -2.6% 3486 perf-stat.ps.context-switches
9.548e+11 +7.3% 1.025e+12 perf-stat.total.instructions
136494 +4.3% 142419 proc-vmstat.nr_inactive_file
136494 +4.3% 142419 proc-vmstat.nr_zone_inactive_file
2784208 +4.8% 2917180 proc-vmstat.numa_hit
2435763 +5.5% 2568673 proc-vmstat.numa_local
3042276 +5.1% 3196281 proc-vmstat.pgalloc_normal
2627503 +6.9% 2808220 proc-vmstat.pgfault
2754381 +5.4% 2903034 proc-vmstat.pgfree
97857 +6.3% 104058 proc-vmstat.pgreuse
9.80 -9.4% 8.88 postmark.creation_mixed_trans
112312 -7.0% 104473 postmark.data_read
203502 -7.0% 189298 postmark.data_written
9.80 -9.4% 8.88 postmark.deletion_mixed_trans
9.73 -9.5% 8.80 postmark.files_appended
12.59 -7.0% 11.70 postmark.files_created
12.59 -7.0% 11.70 postmark.files_deleted
9.87 -9.5% 8.93 postmark.files_read
715.35 +7.5% 768.93 postmark.time.elapsed_time
715.35 +7.5% 768.93 postmark.time.elapsed_time.max
51508 -1.6% 50690 postmark.time.voluntary_context_switches
19.61 -9.5% 17.75 postmark.transactions
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next reply other threads:[~2025-10-27 7:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-27 7:41 kernel test robot [this message]
2025-10-27 7:49 ` [linus:master] [btrfs] b7fdfd29a1: postmark.transactions 9.5% regression Qu Wenruo
2025-10-28 5:14 ` Oliver Sang
2025-10-31 19:20 ` David Sterba
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202510271449.efa21738-lkp@intel.com \
--to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=dsterba@suse.com \
--cc=hrx@bupt.moe \
--cc=linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=wqu@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.