From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 59011322C98; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 18:47:57 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761590877; cv=none; b=QdQEJ+AQaKzSxP1+3HYk5CYyN2T31kZfqvvwE+ncW8KoGO8d1o/TSzDllJImtI1qloW+Fa8RXjayRSbNT69+KNOvrnyhqWcDIped2RnBeBL0nNO+LRJjly20Se4YrTDoxK3q7Z9KBuqYnFgb7gzZUm+mHMqKCcI1rzVD34k0RU0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761590877; c=relaxed/simple; bh=F3sQzkcsf+YwUxRvsHNEJG9s0EMeO/naDwi12vnMnuU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=RMEyn2OgNpz3UJm946kR6X276Z0CluzBrersr+7G3kEwGvWKYtvD6nQ3l7dGf+WXC0KF7WewRbfaqm+kT0wbz8o1+HrPd52UawA/b+9jRUvsROzggjxzyPaWd89dnHzk0oLI0SbuFJbv1xdo57uW1w1f/8hPr8ty5aXp3eaPHyw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=TPLh4u5U; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="TPLh4u5U" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AA872C4CEF1; Mon, 27 Oct 2025 18:47:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1761590877; bh=F3sQzkcsf+YwUxRvsHNEJG9s0EMeO/naDwi12vnMnuU=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=TPLh4u5URY42QG9yiMZUqnf9CXKpC0tKDJhxB67L2dx8kbetS+Iz0usYtZUMnrciE cHcc5a/dzT8R3Mm4V+XNOXveHAp9Ah+pfVd/Ua9yQlTf/HOUu+jUDxjYBumBKt8LMB 8rd6KmjHGsS6hocyOjXoTQuFt7zZ7N/J7fYlszn8= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Krzysztof Kozlowski , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 5.4 209/224] memory: samsung: exynos-srom: Correct alignment Date: Mon, 27 Oct 2025 19:35:55 +0100 Message-ID: <20251027183514.359009580@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.1 In-Reply-To: <20251027183508.963233542@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20251027183508.963233542@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 5.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [ Upstream commit 90de1c75d8acd83e9a699b93153307a1e411ef3a ] Align indentation with open parenthesis (or fix existing alignment). Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski Stable-dep-of: 6744085079e7 ("memory: samsung: exynos-srom: Fix of_iomap leak in exynos_srom_probe") Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/memory/samsung/exynos-srom.c | 22 +++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos-srom.c +++ b/drivers/memory/samsung/exynos-srom.c @@ -47,9 +47,9 @@ struct exynos_srom { struct exynos_srom_reg_dump *reg_offset; }; -static struct exynos_srom_reg_dump *exynos_srom_alloc_reg_dump( - const unsigned long *rdump, - unsigned long nr_rdump) +static struct exynos_srom_reg_dump * +exynos_srom_alloc_reg_dump(const unsigned long *rdump, + unsigned long nr_rdump) { struct exynos_srom_reg_dump *rd; unsigned int i; @@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static int exynos_srom_probe(struct plat } srom = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, - sizeof(struct exynos_srom), GFP_KERNEL); + sizeof(struct exynos_srom), GFP_KERNEL); if (!srom) return -ENOMEM; @@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ static int exynos_srom_probe(struct plat platform_set_drvdata(pdev, srom); srom->reg_offset = exynos_srom_alloc_reg_dump(exynos_srom_offsets, - ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_srom_offsets)); + ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_srom_offsets)); if (!srom->reg_offset) { iounmap(srom->reg_base); return -ENOMEM; @@ -157,16 +157,16 @@ static int exynos_srom_probe(struct plat #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP static void exynos_srom_save(void __iomem *base, - struct exynos_srom_reg_dump *rd, - unsigned int num_regs) + struct exynos_srom_reg_dump *rd, + unsigned int num_regs) { for (; num_regs > 0; --num_regs, ++rd) rd->value = readl(base + rd->offset); } static void exynos_srom_restore(void __iomem *base, - const struct exynos_srom_reg_dump *rd, - unsigned int num_regs) + const struct exynos_srom_reg_dump *rd, + unsigned int num_regs) { for (; num_regs > 0; --num_regs, ++rd) writel(rd->value, base + rd->offset); @@ -177,7 +177,7 @@ static int exynos_srom_suspend(struct de struct exynos_srom *srom = dev_get_drvdata(dev); exynos_srom_save(srom->reg_base, srom->reg_offset, - ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_srom_offsets)); + ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_srom_offsets)); return 0; } @@ -186,7 +186,7 @@ static int exynos_srom_resume(struct dev struct exynos_srom *srom = dev_get_drvdata(dev); exynos_srom_restore(srom->reg_base, srom->reg_offset, - ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_srom_offsets)); + ARRAY_SIZE(exynos_srom_offsets)); return 0; } #endif