All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Daniel Wagner <dwagner@suse.de>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Daniel Wagner <wagi@kernel.org>,
	Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
	John Meneghini <jmeneghi@redhat.com>,
	Bryan Gurney <bgurney@redhat.com>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: drop bogus nid quirk for multipath devices which passed id test
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2025 10:59:07 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251029095907.GA1652@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bd91a6c1-cefc-43e2-8dd8-48b7ea241ded@flourine.local>

On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 10:45:57AM +0100, Daniel Wagner wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 08:44:03AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > But more imporantly dropping the quirk for multipath devices is
> > fundamentally the wrong thing to do, as we really need proper IDs for
> > multipathing. So just add another entry for the Dell device using
> > the dell subvendor/subdevice id that does not have the quirk.
> 
> The problem it is not possible to distinguish between the two devices
> based on subvendor/subdevice ids. I've tried to find some way to keep
> those two devices apart, serial numbers but I don't think there is
> something usable. Thus the idea to rely our own sanity checks and
> enable the feature if these pass. 

The problem is that there is no such thing as a sanity check.  Otherwise
life would be easy.  But I really can't believe that Dell is incompetent
enough to not leave a mark of their OEM Firmware version anywhere.


  reply	other threads:[~2025-10-29  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-28 12:54 [PATCH] nvme: drop bogus nid quirk for multipath devices which passed id test Daniel Wagner
2025-10-29  7:44 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-10-29  9:45   ` Daniel Wagner
2025-10-29  9:59     ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-10-29 10:14       ` Daniel Wagner
2025-10-29 13:38         ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05  7:33 ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251029095907.GA1652@lst.de \
    --to=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=bgurney@redhat.com \
    --cc=dwagner@suse.de \
    --cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
    --cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=wagi@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.