Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] vfio/pci: Add dma-buf export support for MMIO regions

[Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>]

On Wed, Oct 29, 2025 at 05:25:03PM -0700, Samiullah Khawaja wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 13, 2025 at 8:27 AM Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org> wrote:
> >
> > From: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> >
> > Add support for exporting PCI device MMIO regions through dma-buf,
> > enabling safe sharing of non-struct page memory with controlled
> > lifetime management. This allows RDMA and other subsystems to import
> > dma-buf FDs and build them into memory regions for PCI P2P operations.
> >
> > The implementation provides a revocable attachment mechanism using
> > dma-buf move operations. MMIO regions are normally pinned as BARs
> > don't change physical addresses, but access is revoked when the VFIO
> > device is closed or a PCI reset is issued. This ensures kernel
> > self-defense against potentially hostile userspace.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Vivek Kasireddy <vivek.kasireddy@intel.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@nvidia.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/vfio/pci/Kconfig           |   3 +
> >  drivers/vfio/pci/Makefile          |   2 +
> >  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_config.c |  22 +-
> >  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_core.c   |  28 ++
> >  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c | 446 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_priv.h   |  23 ++
> >  include/linux/vfio_pci_core.h      |   1 +
> >  include/uapi/linux/vfio.h          |  25 ++
> >  8 files changed, 546 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 drivers/vfio/pci/vfio_pci_dmabuf.c

<...>

> > +void vfio_pci_dma_buf_move(struct vfio_pci_core_device *vdev, bool revoked)
> > +{
> > +       struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *priv;
> > +       struct vfio_pci_dma_buf *tmp;
> > +
> > +       lockdep_assert_held_write(&vdev->memory_lock);
> > +
> > +       list_for_each_entry_safe(priv, tmp, &vdev->dmabufs, dmabufs_elm) {
> > +               if (!get_file_active(&priv->dmabuf->file))
> > +                       continue;
> > +
> > +               if (priv->revoked != revoked) {
> > +                       dma_resv_lock(priv->dmabuf->resv, NULL);
> > +                       priv->revoked = revoked;
> > +                       dma_buf_move_notify(priv->dmabuf);
> 
> I think this should only be called when revoked is true, otherwise
> this will be calling move_notify on the already revoked dmabuf
> attachments.

This case is protected by "if (priv->revoked)" check both in vfio_pci_dma_buf_map
and vfio_pci_dma_buf_attach. They will prevent DMABUF recreation if revoked is false.

VTW, please trim your replies, it is time consuming to find your reply
among 600 lines of unrelated text.

Thanks

> > +                       dma_resv_unlock(priv->dmabuf->resv);
> > +               }
> > +               dma_buf_put(priv->dmabuf);
> > +       }
> > +}