From: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@networkplumber.org>
To: dev@dpdk.org
Subject: Re: retest
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 08:35:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251030083527.49d149d6@phoenix> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251024025647.1563088-1-chen.qiguo@zte.com.cn>
On Fri, 24 Oct 2025 10:56:47 +0800
Qiguo Chen <chen.qiguo@zte.com.cn> wrote:
> Currently, various testing labs perform CI testing on new patch series sent
> to dev at dpdk.org and report their results to
> https://patchwork.dpdk.org/project/dpdk/list/. On each series on the patch
> list, the results appear in the test category contexts for IOL (community
> lab), GitHub, and LoongSon.
>
> If a reported failure on a series seems suspicious to the patch submitter
> or maintainer, then there may be an interest in requesting a retest on the
> series for the failing label(s) in order to verify the failure is not
> spurious or a false positive. This retest demonstrates to the submitter or
> maintainer that the failure can be reliably reproduced. Unfortunately, at
> present, the best way to accomplish this is to reach out to lab maintainers
> via email or Slack. This is not ideal for developers in need of quick test
> results.
>
> Going forward, CI testing labs will be implementing the option to request
> retest for their respective test labels on patchwork via emails sent to the
> dev mailing list. This feature is ready today for labels reported by the
> UNH-IOL Community Lab, and will soon also be an option for the Github Robot
> at least.
>
> In order to request a retest on your patch series, send an email reply to
> one of your series’s patch or cover letter emails with email content of the
> format used below:
>
> Recheck-request: <test names>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-30 15:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-16 9:09 [PATCH v1 0/2] Optimization Summary for RISC-V rte_memcpy Qiguo Chen
2025-10-16 9:09 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] riscv support rte_memcpy in vector Qiguo Chen
2025-10-17 5:29 ` sunyuechi
2025-10-17 10:10 ` chen.qiguo
2025-10-17 9:36 ` [PATCH v2 0/1] Optimization Summary for RISC-V rte_memcpy Qiguo Chen
2025-10-17 9:36 ` [PATCH v2 1/1] riscv support rte_memcpy in vector Qiguo Chen
2025-10-20 9:43 ` sunyuechi
2025-10-20 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 0/1] Optimization Summary for RISC-V rte_memcpy Qiguo Chen
2025-10-20 12:08 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] lib/eal/riscv: optimize rte_memcpy with RISCV vector and zicbop extensions Qiguo Chen
2025-10-21 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 0/1] Optimization Summary for RISC-V rte_memcpy Qiguo Chen
2025-10-21 6:56 ` [PATCH v4 1/1] eal/riscv: optimize rte_memcpy with vector and zicbop extensions Qiguo Chen
2025-10-24 2:56 ` retest Qiguo Chen
2025-10-30 15:35 ` Stephen Hemminger [this message]
2025-10-24 3:04 ` retest Qiguo Chen
2025-10-24 3:12 ` retest Qiguo Chen
2025-10-24 5:04 ` retest Qiguo Chen
2025-10-24 5:41 ` [PATCH v5 0/1] Optimization Summary for RISC-V rte_memcpy Qiguo Chen
2025-10-24 5:41 ` [PATCH v5 1/1] eal/riscv: optimize rte_memcpy with vector and zicbop extensions Qiguo Chen
2025-10-24 7:27 ` [PATCH v6 0/1] Optimization Summary for RISC-V rte_memcpy Qiguo Chen
2025-10-24 7:27 ` [PATCH v6 1/1] eal/riscv: optimize rte_memcpy with vector and zicbop extensions Qiguo Chen
2025-11-17 4:19 ` sunyuechi
2025-11-17 9:12 ` chen.qiguo
2025-10-24 16:27 ` [PATCH v5 " Stephen Hemminger
2025-11-17 4:11 ` sunyuechi
2025-10-16 9:09 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] benchmark report for rte_memcpy Qiguo Chen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251030083527.49d149d6@phoenix \
--to=stephen@networkplumber.org \
--cc=dev@dpdk.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.