From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>,
bpf@vger.kernel.org, andrii@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, dwarves@vger.kernel.org,
alan.maguire@oracle.com, acme@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com,
tj@kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] bpf: Support for kfuncs with KF_MAGIC_ARGS
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 18:24:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202510301811.fP0doUEk-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251029190113.3323406-4-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
Hi Ihor,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on bpf-next/master]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ihor-Solodrai/bpf-Add-BTF_ID_LIST_END-and-BTF_ID_LIST_SIZE-macros/20251030-030608
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251029190113.3323406-4-ihor.solodrai%40linux.dev
patch subject: [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] bpf: Support for kfuncs with KF_MAGIC_ARGS
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-003-20251030 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251030/202510301811.fP0doUEk-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: gcc-13 (Debian 13.3.0-16) 13.3.0
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251030/202510301811.fP0doUEk-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202510301811.fP0doUEk-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
| ^
include/linux/compiler.h:166:29: note: in expansion of macro '__PASTE'
166 | #define __UNIQUE_ID(prefix) __PASTE(__PASTE(__UNIQUE_ID_, prefix), __COUNTER__)
| ^~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler_types.h:84:22: note: in expansion of macro '___PASTE'
84 | #define __PASTE(a,b) ___PASTE(a,b)
| ^~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:166:37: note: in expansion of macro '__PASTE'
166 | #define __UNIQUE_ID(prefix) __PASTE(__PASTE(__UNIQUE_ID_, prefix), __COUNTER__)
| ^~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:286:9: note: in expansion of macro '__UNIQUE_ID'
286 | __UNIQUE_ID(__PASTE(__addressable_,sym)) = (void *)(uintptr_t)&sym;
| ^~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:289:9: note: in expansion of macro '___ADDRESSABLE'
289 | ___ADDRESSABLE(sym, __section(".discard.addressable"))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:250:9: note: in expansion of macro '__ADDRESSABLE'
250 | __ADDRESSABLE(fn)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:255:9: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall_stub'
255 | __define_initcall_stub(__stub, fn) \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:268:9: note: in expansion of macro '____define_initcall'
268 | ____define_initcall(fn, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:274:9: note: in expansion of macro '__unique_initcall'
274 | __unique_initcall(fn, id, __sec, __initcall_id(fn))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:276:35: note: in expansion of macro '___define_initcall'
276 | #define __define_initcall(fn, id) ___define_initcall(fn, id, .initcall##id)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:307:41: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall'
307 | #define late_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 7)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18983:1: note: in expansion of macro 'late_initcall'
18983 | late_initcall(unbound_reg_init);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/uapi/linux/filter.h:9,
from include/linux/bpf.h:8:
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18983:15: error: 'unbound_reg_init' undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean 'unbound_reg'?
18983 | late_initcall(unbound_reg_init);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:286:72: note: in definition of macro '___ADDRESSABLE'
286 | __UNIQUE_ID(__PASTE(__addressable_,sym)) = (void *)(uintptr_t)&sym;
| ^~~
include/linux/init.h:250:9: note: in expansion of macro '__ADDRESSABLE'
250 | __ADDRESSABLE(fn)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:255:9: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall_stub'
255 | __define_initcall_stub(__stub, fn) \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:268:9: note: in expansion of macro '____define_initcall'
268 | ____define_initcall(fn, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:274:9: note: in expansion of macro '__unique_initcall'
274 | __unique_initcall(fn, id, __sec, __initcall_id(fn))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:276:35: note: in expansion of macro '___define_initcall'
276 | #define __define_initcall(fn, id) ___define_initcall(fn, id, .initcall##id)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:307:41: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall'
307 | #define late_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 7)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18983:1: note: in expansion of macro 'late_initcall'
18983 | late_initcall(unbound_reg_init);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18983:15: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for each function it appears in
18983 | late_initcall(unbound_reg_init);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/compiler.h:286:72: note: in definition of macro '___ADDRESSABLE'
286 | __UNIQUE_ID(__PASTE(__addressable_,sym)) = (void *)(uintptr_t)&sym;
| ^~~
include/linux/init.h:250:9: note: in expansion of macro '__ADDRESSABLE'
250 | __ADDRESSABLE(fn)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:255:9: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall_stub'
255 | __define_initcall_stub(__stub, fn) \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:268:9: note: in expansion of macro '____define_initcall'
268 | ____define_initcall(fn, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:274:9: note: in expansion of macro '__unique_initcall'
274 | __unique_initcall(fn, id, __sec, __initcall_id(fn))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:276:35: note: in expansion of macro '___define_initcall'
276 | #define __define_initcall(fn, id) ___define_initcall(fn, id, .initcall##id)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:307:41: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall'
307 | #define late_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 7)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18983:1: note: in expansion of macro 'late_initcall'
18983 | late_initcall(unbound_reg_init);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/printk.h:6,
from include/asm-generic/bug.h:22,
from arch/x86/include/asm/bug.h:108,
from include/linux/bug.h:5,
from include/linux/alloc_tag.h:8,
from include/linux/workqueue.h:9,
from include/linux/bpf.h:11:
>> include/linux/init.h:256:9: error: expected declaration specifiers before 'asm'
256 | asm(".section \"" __sec "\", \"a\" \n" \
| ^~~
include/linux/init.h:268:9: note: in expansion of macro '____define_initcall'
268 | ____define_initcall(fn, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:274:9: note: in expansion of macro '__unique_initcall'
274 | __unique_initcall(fn, id, __sec, __initcall_id(fn))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:276:35: note: in expansion of macro '___define_initcall'
276 | #define __define_initcall(fn, id) ___define_initcall(fn, id, .initcall##id)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:307:41: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall'
307 | #define late_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 7)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18983:1: note: in expansion of macro 'late_initcall'
18983 | late_initcall(unbound_reg_init);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
In file included from include/linux/init.h:5:
include/linux/build_bug.h:78:41: error: expected declaration specifiers before '_Static_assert'
78 | #define __static_assert(expr, msg, ...) _Static_assert(expr, msg)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/build_bug.h:77:34: note: in expansion of macro '__static_assert'
77 | #define static_assert(expr, ...) __static_assert(expr, ##__VA_ARGS__, #expr)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:260:9: note: in expansion of macro 'static_assert'
260 | static_assert(__same_type(initcall_t, &fn));
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:268:9: note: in expansion of macro '____define_initcall'
268 | ____define_initcall(fn, \
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:274:9: note: in expansion of macro '__unique_initcall'
274 | __unique_initcall(fn, id, __sec, __initcall_id(fn))
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:276:35: note: in expansion of macro '___define_initcall'
276 | #define __define_initcall(fn, id) ___define_initcall(fn, id, .initcall##id)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
include/linux/init.h:307:41: note: in expansion of macro '__define_initcall'
307 | #define late_initcall(fn) __define_initcall(fn, 7)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18983:1: note: in expansion of macro 'late_initcall'
18983 | late_initcall(unbound_reg_init);
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18983:32: error: expected declaration specifiers before ';' token
18983 | late_initcall(unbound_reg_init);
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:18987:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
18987 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19002:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19002 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19015:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19015 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19139:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19139 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19212:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19212 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19232:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19232 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19241:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19241 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19282:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19282 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19343:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19343 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19373:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19373 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19390:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19390 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19453:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19453 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19477:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19477 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19833:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19833 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19861:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19861 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19867:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19867 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19878:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19878 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19884:1: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before '{' token
19884 | {
| ^
kernel/bpf/verifier.c:19930:1: warning: empty declaration
vim +/asm +256 include/linux/init.h
a8cccdd954732a5 Sami Tolvanen 2020-12-11 252
1b1eeca7e4c19fa Ard Biesheuvel 2018-08-21 253 #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_PREL32_RELOCATIONS
3578ad11f3fba07 Sami Tolvanen 2020-12-11 254 #define ____define_initcall(fn, __stub, __name, __sec) \
3578ad11f3fba07 Sami Tolvanen 2020-12-11 255 __define_initcall_stub(__stub, fn) \
a8cccdd954732a5 Sami Tolvanen 2020-12-11 @256 asm(".section \"" __sec "\", \"a\" \n" \
a8cccdd954732a5 Sami Tolvanen 2020-12-11 257 __stringify(__name) ": \n" \
3578ad11f3fba07 Sami Tolvanen 2020-12-11 258 ".long " __stringify(__stub) " - . \n" \
1cb61759d407166 Marco Elver 2021-05-21 259 ".previous \n"); \
1cb61759d407166 Marco Elver 2021-05-21 260 static_assert(__same_type(initcall_t, &fn));
1b1eeca7e4c19fa Ard Biesheuvel 2018-08-21 261 #else
3578ad11f3fba07 Sami Tolvanen 2020-12-11 262 #define ____define_initcall(fn, __unused, __name, __sec) \
a8cccdd954732a5 Sami Tolvanen 2020-12-11 263 static initcall_t __name __used \
a8cccdd954732a5 Sami Tolvanen 2020-12-11 264 __attribute__((__section__(__sec))) = fn;
1b1eeca7e4c19fa Ard Biesheuvel 2018-08-21 265 #endif
1b1eeca7e4c19fa Ard Biesheuvel 2018-08-21 266
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-10-30 10:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-29 19:01 [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/8] bpf: magic kernel functions Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 1/8] bpf: Add BTF_ID_LIST_END and BTF_ID_LIST_SIZE macros Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 19:41 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-29 20:44 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 23:54 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 2/8] bpf: Refactor btf_kfunc_id_set_contains Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 23:55 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/8] bpf: Support for kfuncs with KF_MAGIC_ARGS Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 19:41 ` bot+bpf-ci
2025-10-29 20:49 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 23:59 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-29 23:54 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 0:03 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2025-10-30 16:31 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 17:26 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 10:24 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-10-30 11:58 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-30 13:54 ` kernel test robot
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 4/8] bpf: Support __magic prog_aux arguments for kfuncs Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 5/8] bpf: Re-define bpf_wq_set_callback as magic kfunc Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 0:16 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 6/8] bpf,docs: Document KF_MAGIC_ARGS flag and __magic annotation Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 0:21 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 7/8] bpf: Re-define bpf_task_work_schedule_* kfuncs as magic Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-29 19:01 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 8/8] bpf: Re-define bpf_stream_vprintk as a magic kfunc Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 0:44 ` [PATCH bpf-next v1 0/8] bpf: magic kernel functions Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 6:11 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 18:14 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 18:24 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 18:37 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 18:26 ` Alan Maguire
2025-10-30 18:42 ` Eduard Zingerman
2025-10-30 18:46 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 19:47 ` Andrii Nakryiko
2025-10-30 20:02 ` Ihor Solodrai
2025-10-30 20:38 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202510301811.fP0doUEk-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=alan.maguire@oracle.com \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dwarves@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
--cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.