All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,stable@vger.kernel.org,konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com,eadavis@qq.com,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + nilfs2-avoid-having-an-active-sc_timer-before-freeing-sci.patch added to mm-hotfixes-unstable branch
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 21:20:09 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251031042010.764EEC4CEE7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: nilfs2: avoid having an active sc_timer before freeing sci
has been added to the -mm mm-hotfixes-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     nilfs2-avoid-having-an-active-sc_timer-before-freeing-sci.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/nilfs2-avoid-having-an-active-sc_timer-before-freeing-sci.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via the mm-everything
branch at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there every 2-3 working days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com>
Subject: nilfs2: avoid having an active sc_timer before freeing sci
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2025 07:51:52 +0900

Because kthread_stop did not stop sc_task properly and returned -EINTR,
the sc_timer was not properly closed, ultimately causing the problem [1]
reported by syzbot when freeing sci due to the sc_timer not being closed.

Because the thread sc_task main function nilfs_segctor_thread() returns 0
when it succeeds, when the return value of kthread_stop() is not 0 in
nilfs_segctor_destroy(), we believe that it has not properly closed
sc_timer.

We use timer_shutdown_sync() to sync wait for sc_timer to shutdown, and
set the value of sc_task to NULL under the protection of lock
sc_state_lock, so as to avoid the issue caused by sc_timer not being
properly shutdowned.

[1]
ODEBUG: free active (active state 0) object: 00000000dacb411a object type: timer_list hint: nilfs_construction_timeout
Call trace:
 nilfs_segctor_destroy fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2811 [inline]
 nilfs_detach_log_writer+0x668/0x8cc fs/nilfs2/segment.c:2877
 nilfs_put_super+0x4c/0x12c fs/nilfs2/super.c:509

Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20251029225226.16044-1-konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com
Fixes: 3f66cc261ccb ("nilfs2: use kthread_create and kthread_stop for the log writer thread")
Signed-off-by: Ryusuke Konishi <konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com>
Reported-by: syzbot+24d8b70f039151f65590@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Closes: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?extid=24d8b70f039151f65590
Tested-by: syzbot+24d8b70f039151f65590@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Edward Adam Davis <eadavis@qq.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>	[6.12+]
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 fs/nilfs2/segment.c |    7 ++++++-
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c~nilfs2-avoid-having-an-active-sc_timer-before-freeing-sci
+++ a/fs/nilfs2/segment.c
@@ -2768,7 +2768,12 @@ static void nilfs_segctor_destroy(struct
 
 	if (sci->sc_task) {
 		wake_up(&sci->sc_wait_daemon);
-		kthread_stop(sci->sc_task);
+		if (kthread_stop(sci->sc_task)) {
+			spin_lock(&sci->sc_state_lock);
+			sci->sc_task = NULL;
+			timer_shutdown_sync(&sci->sc_timer);
+			spin_unlock(&sci->sc_state_lock);
+		}
 	}
 
 	spin_lock(&sci->sc_state_lock);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from eadavis@qq.com are

nilfs2-avoid-having-an-active-sc_timer-before-freeing-sci.patch


                 reply	other threads:[~2025-10-31  4:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251031042010.764EEC4CEE7@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=eadavis@qq.com \
    --cc=konishi.ryusuke@gmail.com \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.