All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, linux-coco@lists.linux.dev,
	bhelgaas@google.com, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org,
	yilun.xu@linux.intel.com, aik@amd.com,
	"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] resource: Introduce resource_assigned() for discerning active resources
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 09:17:32 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251105091732.0000302c@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251105040055.2832866-2-dan.j.williams@intel.com>

On Tue,  4 Nov 2025 20:00:50 -0800
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> wrote:

> A PCI bridge resource lifecycle involves both a "request" and "assign"
> phase. At any point in time that resource may not yet be assigned, or may
> have failed to assign (because it does not fit).
> 
> There are multiple conventions to determine when assignment has not
> completed: IORESOURCE_UNSET, IORESOURCE_DISABLED, and checking whether the
> resource is parented.
> 
> In code paths that are known to not be racing assignment, e.g. post
> subsys_initcall(), the most reliable method to judge that a bridge resource
> is assigned is to check the resource is parented [1].
> 
> Introduce a resource_assigned() helper for this purpose.
> 
> Link: http://lore.kernel.org/2b9f7f7b-d6a4-be59-14d4-7b4ffccfe373@linux.intel.com [1]
> Suggested-by: Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
One trivial thing on documentation style below.

> ---
>  include/linux/ioport.h | 9 +++++++++
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/ioport.h b/include/linux/ioport.h
> index e8b2d6aa4013..9afa30f9346f 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ioport.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ioport.h
> @@ -334,6 +334,15 @@ static inline bool resource_union(const struct resource *r1, const struct resour
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> +/*
> + * Check if this resource is added to a resource tree or detached. Caller is
> + * responsible for not racing assignment.
> + */

Some stuff in this file now has kernel-doc style comments. To me it
seems like a better idea to use that style for new function descriptions
whilst perhaps not being worth the churn that would be inherent in switching
all docs to that style.

> +static inline bool resource_assigned(struct resource *res)
> +{
> +	return res->parent;
> +}
> +
>  int find_resource_space(struct resource *root, struct resource *new,
>  			resource_size_t size, struct resource_constraint *constraint);
>  


  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-05  9:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-05  4:00 [PATCH 0/6] PCI/TSM: Finalize "Link" TSM infrastructure Dan Williams
2025-11-05  4:00 ` [PATCH 1/6] resource: Introduce resource_assigned() for discerning active resources Dan Williams
2025-11-05  9:17   ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-11-05 21:57     ` dan.j.williams
2025-11-05  4:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] PCI/IDE: Add Address Association Register setup for downstream MMIO Dan Williams
2025-11-05  9:58   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-05 23:04     ` dan.j.williams
2025-11-10 11:49       ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-05  4:00 ` [PATCH 3/6] PCI/IDE: Initialize an ID for all IDE streams Dan Williams
2025-11-05 15:27   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-05 23:51     ` dan.j.williams
2025-11-10 11:52       ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-05  4:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] PCI/TSM: Add pci_tsm_bind() helper for instantiating TDIs Dan Williams
2025-11-05  4:59   ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2025-11-05 21:49     ` dan.j.williams
2025-11-05 15:31   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-06  0:11     ` dan.j.williams
2025-11-05  4:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] PCI/TSM: Add pci_tsm_guest_req() for managing TDIs Dan Williams
2025-11-05 15:38   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-06  0:13     ` dan.j.williams
2025-11-05  4:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] PCI/TSM: Add 'dsm' and 'bound' attributes for dependent functions Dan Williams
2025-11-05 17:53   ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-13 12:10   ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251105091732.0000302c@huawei.com \
    --to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=aik@amd.com \
    --cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-coco@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yilun.xu@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.