Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: dts: imx: move nand related property under nand@0

[Francesco Dolcini <francesco@dolcini.it>]

Hello Frank,

On Tue, Nov 04, 2025 at 05:27:14PM -0500, Frank Li wrote:
> Add child node nand@0 and move NAND related property under it to align
> modern nand-controller.yaml.
> 
> Fix below CHECK_DTBS warnings:
>   arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ull-colibri-aster.dtb: nand-controller@1806000 (fsl,imx6q-gpmi-nand): Unevaluated properties are not allowed ('nand-ecc-mode', 'nand-ecc-step-size', 'nand-ecc-strength', 'nand-on-flash-bbt' were unexpected)
>         from schema $id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/mtd/gpmi-nand.yaml#
> 
> Since 2019 year, commit
> (212e496935929 dt-bindings: mtd: Add YAML schemas for the generic NAND options)
> NAND related property is preferred located under nand@<n> even though only
> one NAND chip supported.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
> ---
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6-logicpd-som.dtsi           |  6 +++++-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qdl-icore.dtsi              |  6 +++++-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qdl-phytec-pfla02.dtsi      |  6 +++++-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qdl-phytec-phycore-som.dtsi |  6 +++++-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qdl-skov-cpu.dtsi           |  6 +++++-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6qdl-tx6.dtsi                |  6 +++++-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-geam.dts                 |  6 +++++-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-isiot.dtsi               |  6 +++++-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-phytec-phycore-som.dtsi  |  6 +++++-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ul-tx6ul.dtsi               |  6 +++++-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ull-colibri.dtsi            | 12 ++++++++----
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ull-engicam-microgea.dtsi   | 12 ++++++++----
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ull-myir-mys-6ulx.dtsi      |  6 +++++-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx6ulz-bsh-smm-m2.dts          |  6 +++++-
>  arch/arm/boot/dts/nxp/imx/imx7-colibri.dtsi               |  8 ++++++--
>  15 files changed, 82 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> 

Was any of these changes tested? Is the driver able to cope with the
binding change?

Francesco