From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Keith Busch <kbusch@meta.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] blk-integrity: support arbitrary buffer alignment
Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 15:53:09 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251105145309.GA26042@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aQtiYd69E-3G_PC4@kbusch-mbp>
On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 07:42:41AM -0700, Keith Busch wrote:
> This generally does pass 'void *' to contiguous protection data. If the
> actual protection payload is spread across multiple segments, though, we
> don't have contiguous data, so we have to bounce it through something.
> Declaring the union on the stack provides this memory for that unusual
> case. If the bip segment is big enough, we point the 'void *' directly
> at it; if not, we point it to the temporary onstack allocation. Using
> a union ensures that it's definitely big enough for any checksum type.
The union contains pointers, which are always 8 bytes. But I guess
I can see now how this didn't blow up, assuming this was only tested
on classic PI, as the tuples are just 8 bytes and you just used the
pointer as storage? I.e. these aren't supposed to be pointers, but
values?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-05 14:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-04 22:40 [RFC PATCH] blk-integrity: support arbitrary buffer alignment Keith Busch
2025-11-05 14:15 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-05 14:42 ` Keith Busch
2025-11-05 14:51 ` Keith Busch
2025-11-05 14:53 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-11-05 16:28 ` Keith Busch
2025-11-06 14:48 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251105145309.GA26042@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=kbusch@meta.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.