From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] block: remove blk_zone_wp_offset()
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 12:03:16 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251106110316.GB30278@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251106070627.96995-2-dlemoal@kernel.org>
On Thu, Nov 06, 2025 at 04:06:26PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> The helper function blk_zone_wp_offset() is called from
> disk_zone_wplug_sync_wp_offset(), and again called from
> blk_revalidate_seq_zone() right after the call to
> disk_zone_wplug_sync_wp_offset().
>
> Change disk_zone_wplug_sync_wp_offset() to return the wp_offset it used
> for updating the target zone write plug to avoid this double call. With
> this change, blk_zone_wp_offset() can be open coded directly in
> disk_zone_wplug_sync_wp_offset(). This open-coding introduces 2 changes:
> handle the BLK_COND_ZONE_ACTIVE case, and return UINT_MAX as the
> wp_offset for a full zone, since the write pointer of full zones is
> invalid.
>
> For the case where a zone does not have a zone write plug,
> disk_zone_wplug_sync_wp_offset() does nothing and returns 0. This in
> turn leads to blk_revalidate_seq_zone() to immediately return, which is
> exactly what we want (because there is no need to attempt removing a
> zone write plug that does not exist).
I like the use of disk_zone_wplug_sync_wp_offset in
blk_revalidate_seq_zone, but having the switch on the zone conditions
in a separate helper seems nicer than open coding it next to the
write plug handling.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-06 11:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-06 7:06 [PATCH 0/2] Zone related cleanups Damien Le Moal
2025-11-06 7:06 ` [PATCH 1/2] block: remove blk_zone_wp_offset() Damien Le Moal
2025-11-06 11:03 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2025-11-06 7:06 ` [PATCH 2/2] block: introduce bdev_zone_start() Damien Le Moal
2025-11-06 11:03 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-11-06 16:02 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251106110316.GB30278@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.