From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
"David Jander" <david@protonic.nl>,
"Oleksij Rempel" <o.rempel@pengutronix.de>,
kernel@pengutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
"Andy Shevchenko" <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>,
"David Lechner" <dlechner@baylibre.com>,
"Nuno Sá" <nuno.sa@analog.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] iio: adc: Add TI ADS131M0x ADC driver
Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2025 19:21:44 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202511061850.kYeqflcU-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251105143814.1807444-3-o.rempel@pengutronix.de>
Hi Oleksij,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on jic23-iio/togreg]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.18-rc4 next-20251106]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Oleksij-Rempel/bindings-iio-adc-Add-bindings-for-TI-ADS131M0x-ADCs/20251105-224149
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jic23/iio.git togreg
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20251105143814.1807444-3-o.rempel%40pengutronix.de
patch subject: [PATCH v1 2/2] iio: adc: Add TI ADS131M0x ADC driver
config: loongarch-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251106/202511061850.kYeqflcU-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 19.1.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project cd708029e0b2869e80abe31ddb175f7c35361f90)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20251106/202511061850.kYeqflcU-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202511061850.kYeqflcU-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads131m0x.c:174:2: error: call to undeclared function 'put_unaligned_be24'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
174 | put_unaligned_be24(command << 8, &priv->tx_buffer[0]);
| ^
drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads131m0x.c:163:6: warning: unused variable 'ret' [-Wunused-variable]
163 | int ret;
| ^~~
>> drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads131m0x.c:224:11: error: call to undeclared function 'get_unaligned_be16'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
224 | status = get_unaligned_be16(&priv->rx_buffer[0]);
| ^
drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads131m0x.c:271:2: error: call to undeclared function 'put_unaligned_be24'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
271 | put_unaligned_be24(command << 8, &priv->tx_buffer[0]);
| ^
drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads131m0x.c:304:13: error: call to undeclared function 'get_unaligned_be16'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
304 | response = get_unaligned_be16(&priv->rx_buffer[0]);
| ^
drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads131m0x.c:376:9: error: call to undeclared function 'get_unaligned_be16'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
376 | *val = get_unaligned_be16(&priv->rx_buffer[0]);
| ^
drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads131m0x.c:461:17: error: call to undeclared function 'get_unaligned_be16'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
461 | received_crc = get_unaligned_be16(&priv->rx_buffer[data_len]);
| ^
drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads131m0x.c:505:11: error: call to undeclared function 'get_unaligned_be16'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
505 | status = get_unaligned_be16(&priv->rx_buffer[0]);
| ^
>> drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads131m0x.c:523:23: error: call to undeclared function 'get_unaligned_be24'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
523 | *val = sign_extend32(get_unaligned_be24(buf), 23);
| ^
drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads131m0x.c:706:13: error: call to undeclared function 'get_unaligned_be16'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
706 | response = get_unaligned_be16(&priv->rx_buffer[0]);
| ^
1 warning and 9 errors generated.
vim +/put_unaligned_be24 +174 drivers/iio/adc/ti-ads131m0x.c
149
150 /**
151 * ads131m_tx_frame_unlocked - Sends a command frame with Input CRC
152 * @priv: Device private data structure.
153 * @command: The 16-bit command to send (e.g., NULL, RREG, RESET).
154 *
155 * Assumes the mutex lock is held.
156 * This function sends a command in Word 0, and its calculated 16-bit
157 * CRC in Word 1, as required when Input CRC is enabled.
158 *
159 * Return: 0 on success, or a negative error code from spi_sync.
160 */
161 static int ads131m_tx_frame_unlocked(struct ads131m_priv *priv, u32 command)
162 {
163 int ret;
164 u16 crc;
165
166 /*
167 * Zero the entire TX buffer to send a valid frame.
168 */
169 memset(priv->tx_buffer, 0, ADS131M_FRAME_BSIZE(priv->num_channels));
170
171 /*
172 * Word 0: 16-bit command, MSB-aligned in 24-bit word.
173 */
> 174 put_unaligned_be24(command << 8, &priv->tx_buffer[0]);
175
176 /*
177 * Word 1: Input CRC
178 * Calculated over the 3 bytes of Word 0.
179 */
180 crc = ads131m_crc_calculate(priv->tx_buffer, 3);
181 put_unaligned_be24(crc << 8, &priv->tx_buffer[3]);
182
183 return spi_sync(priv->spi, &priv->msg);
184 }
185
186 /**
187 * ads131m_rx_frame_unlocked - Receives a full SPI data frame.
188 * @priv: Device private data structure.
189 *
190 * This function sends a NULL command (with its CRC) to clock out a
191 * full SPI frame from the device (e.g., response + channel data + CRC).
192 *
193 * Assumes the mutex lock is held.
194 *
195 * Return: 0 on success, or a negative error code from spi_sync.
196 */
197 static int ads131m_rx_frame_unlocked(struct ads131m_priv *priv)
198 {
199 return ads131m_tx_frame_unlocked(priv, ADS131M_CMD_NULL);
200 }
201
202 /**
203 * ads131m_check_status_crc_err - Checks for an Input CRC error.
204 * @priv: Device private data structure.
205 *
206 * Sends a NULL command to fetch the STATUS register and checks the
207 * CRC_ERR bit. This is used to verify the integrity of the previous
208 * command (like RREG or WREG).
209 *
210 * Context: This function assumes the mutex 'lock' is held.
211 * Return: 0 on success, -EIO if CRC_ERR bit is set.
212 */
213 static int ads131m_check_status_crc_err(struct ads131m_priv *priv)
214 {
215 int ret;
216 u16 status;
217
218 ret = ads131m_rx_frame_unlocked(priv);
219 if (ret < 0) {
220 dev_err(&priv->spi->dev, "SPI error on STATUS read for CRC check\n");
221 return ret;
222 }
223
> 224 status = get_unaligned_be16(&priv->rx_buffer[0]);
225 if (status & ADS131M_STATUS_CRC_ERR) {
226 dev_err(&priv->spi->dev, "Previous input CRC error, STATUS=0x%04x\n",
227 status);
228 return -EIO;
229 }
230
231 return 0;
232 }
233
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-06 11:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-05 14:38 [PATCH v1 0/2] iio: adc: Add support for TI ADS131M0x ADCs Oleksij Rempel
2025-11-05 14:38 ` [PATCH v1 1/2] bindings: iio: adc: Add bindings " Oleksij Rempel
2025-11-05 18:40 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-06 16:06 ` David Lechner
2025-11-05 14:38 ` [PATCH v1 2/2] iio: adc: Add TI ADS131M0x ADC driver Oleksij Rempel
2025-11-05 14:51 ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2025-11-05 19:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-06 7:53 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-06 8:03 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-06 11:21 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2025-11-06 16:57 ` David Lechner
2025-11-07 10:29 ` Oleksij Rempel
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202511061850.kYeqflcU-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
--cc=david@protonic.nl \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.