All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	razor@blackwall.org, pabeni@redhat.com, willemb@google.com,
	sdf@fomichev.me, john.fastabend@gmail.com, martin.lau@kernel.org,
	jordan@jrife.io, maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com,
	magnus.karlsson@intel.com, dw@davidwei.uk, toke@redhat.com,
	yangzhenze@bytedance.com, wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 11/14] netkit: Implement rtnl_link_ops->alloc and ndo_queue_create
Date: Fri, 7 Nov 2025 07:54:30 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251107075430.6a4f32ff@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <12551093-9384-4801-b2d1-a5505a87f9b4@iogearbox.net>

On Fri, 7 Nov 2025 16:01:44 +0100 Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> On 11/7/25 1:41 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> > On Fri, 31 Oct 2025 22:21:00 +0100 Daniel Borkmann wrote:  
> >> +static void netkit_get_channels(struct net_device *dev,
> >> +				struct ethtool_channels *channels)
> >> +{
> >> +	channels->max_rx = dev->num_rx_queues;
> >> +	channels->max_tx = dev->num_tx_queues;
> >> +	channels->max_other = 0;
> >> +	channels->max_combined = 1;
> >> +	channels->rx_count = dev->real_num_rx_queues;
> >> +	channels->tx_count = dev->real_num_tx_queues;
> >> +	channels->other_count = 0;
> >> +	channels->combined_count = 0;
> >>   }  
> > 
> > Why do we need to implement get_channels?  
> 
> Thanks for the feedback. I think this one was useful imho since it allowed
> for introspection via ethtool on netkit side e.g. the max_rx vs rx_count.

Right, but we have netdev-nl queue-get now which also reports the new
"lease"/"peer" info so it will be much clearer.

Ah, is this because libbpf looks at channels to figure out the queue
count? Can we make it use netdev-nl ?

I guess it could also count the entries in $sysfs/queues/rx-* but that
doesn't express the fact that queue 0 is unusable. Which I suppose the
get_channels implementation was trying to "express" by setting
max_combined=1 ? 😶️

  reply	other threads:[~2025-11-07 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-10-31 21:20 [PATCH net-next v4 00/14] netkit: Support for io_uring zero-copy and AF_XDP Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 01/14] net: Add bind-queue operation Daniel Borkmann
2025-11-07  0:39   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-19 14:57     ` Daniel Borkmann
2025-11-20  2:20       ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 02/14] net: Implement netdev_nl_bind_queue_doit Daniel Borkmann
2025-11-07  0:39   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 03/14] net: Add peer info to queue-get response Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 04/14] net, ethtool: Disallow peered real rxqs to be resized Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 05/14] net: Proxy net_mp_{open,close}_rxq for mapped queues Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 06/14] xsk: Move NETDEV_XDP_ACT_ZC into generic header Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 07/14] xsk: Extend xsk_rcv_check validation Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 08/14] xsk: Proxy pool management for mapped queues Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 09/14] netkit: Add single device mode for netkit Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:20 ` [PATCH net-next v4 10/14] netkit: Document fast vs slowpath members via macros Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 11/14] netkit: Implement rtnl_link_ops->alloc and ndo_queue_create Daniel Borkmann
2025-11-07  0:41   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-07 15:01     ` Daniel Borkmann
2025-11-07 15:54       ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2025-10-31 21:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 12/14] netkit: Add netkit notifier to check for unregistering devices Daniel Borkmann
2025-10-31 21:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 13/14] netkit: Add io_uring zero-copy support for TCP Daniel Borkmann
2025-11-07  0:43   ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-10-31 21:21 ` [PATCH net-next v4 14/14] netkit: Add xsk support for af_xdp applications Daniel Borkmann
2025-11-04 23:22 ` [PATCH net-next v4 00/14] netkit: Support for io_uring zero-copy and AF_XDP Stanislav Fomichev
2025-11-05  0:43   ` David Wei
2025-11-05 19:51     ` Stanislav Fomichev
2025-11-08 22:18       ` David Wei
2025-11-07  0:47 ` Jakub Kicinski
2025-11-07  1:00 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251107075430.6a4f32ff@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=dw@davidwei.uk \
    --cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
    --cc=jordan@jrife.io \
    --cc=maciej.fijalkowski@intel.com \
    --cc=magnus.karlsson@intel.com \
    --cc=martin.lau@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=razor@blackwall.org \
    --cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
    --cc=toke@redhat.com \
    --cc=wangdongdong.6@bytedance.com \
    --cc=willemb@google.com \
    --cc=yangzhenze@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.