From: "ccc194101@163.com" <ccc194101@163.com>
To: stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
"Benjamin Tissoires" <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com>,
"Alan Swanson" <reiver@improbability.net>
Cc: gregkh <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
linux-usb <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
usb-storage <usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
chenchangcheng <chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: usb-storage: No additional quirks need to be added to the ECD819-SU3 optical drive.
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 09:41:25 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202511100941253989454@163.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: c7bf59b5-8078-4b47-b56a-7b5568272d07@rowland.harvard.edu
>On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 02:10:46PM +0800, ccc194101@163.com wrote:
>> From: Chen Changcheng <chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn>
>>
>> The optical drive of ECD819-SU3 has the same vid and pid as INIC-3069,
>> as follows:
>> T:? Bus=02 Lev=02 Prnt=02 Port=01 Cnt=01 Dev#=? 3 Spd=5000 MxCh= 0
>> D:? Ver= 3.00 Cls=00(>ifc ) Sub=00 Prot=00 MxPS= 9 #Cfgs=? 1
>> P:? Vendor=13fd ProdID=3940 Rev= 3.10
>> S:? Manufacturer=HL-DT-ST
>> S:? Product= DVD+-RW GT80N
>> S:? SerialNumber=423349524E4E38303338323439202020
>> C:* #Ifs= 1 Cfg#= 1 Atr=80 MxPwr=144mA
>> I:* If#= 0 Alt= 0 #EPs= 2 Cls=08(stor.) Sub=02 Prot=50 Driver=usb-storage
>> E:? Ad=83(I) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=1024 Ivl=0ms
>> E:? Ad=0a(O) Atr=02(Bulk) MxPS=1024 Ivl=0ms
>>
>> This will result in the optical drive device also adding
>> the quirks of US_FL_NO_ATA_1X. When performing an erase operation,
>> it will fail, and the reason for the failure is as follows:
>> [? 388.967742] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 Send: scmd 0x00000000d20c33a7
>> [? 388.967742] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 CDB: ATA command pass through(12)/Blank a1 11 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>> [? 388.967773] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 Done: SUCCESS Result: hostbyte=DID_TARGET_FAILURE driverbyte=DRIVER_OK cmd_age=0s
>> [? 388.967773] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 CDB: ATA command pass through(12)/Blank a1 11 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
>> [? 388.967803] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 Sense Key : Illegal Request [current]
>> [? 388.967803] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 Add. Sense: Invalid field in cdb
>> [? 388.967803] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 scsi host busy 1 failed 0
>> [? 388.967803] sr 5:0:0:0: Notifying upper driver of completion (result 8100002)
>> [? 388.967834] sr 5:0:0:0: [sr0] tag#0 0 sectors total, 0 bytes done.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chen Changcheng <chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn>
>> ---
>>? drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h | 6 ++++++
>>? 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h b/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h
>> index 1477e31d7763..6d32b787bff8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/storage/unusual_uas.h
>> @@ -97,6 +97,12 @@ UNUSUAL_DEV(0x125f, 0xa94a, 0x0160, 0x0160,
>>? USB_SC_DEVICE, USB_PR_DEVICE, NULL,
>>? US_FL_NO_ATA_1X),
>>?
>> +UNUSUAL_DEV(0x13fd, 0x3940, 0x0310, 0x0310,
>> + "Initio Corporation",
>> + "external DVD burner ECD819-SU3",
>> + USB_SC_DEVICE, USB_PR_DEVICE, NULL,
>> + NULL),
>> +
>>? /* Reported-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> */
>>? UNUSUAL_DEV(0x13fd, 0x3940, 0x0000, 0x9999,
>>? "Initio Corporation",
>
>It's unprecedented to have two quirks with the same VID and PID, where
>the second augments the first by virtue of its wider range of bcdDevice
>values.
>
>As explained in commit 89f23d51defc ("uas: Add US_FL_IGNORE_RESIDUE for
>Initio Corporation INIC-3069"), the original Initio Corporation
>quirk in unusual_uas.h was added as a copy of the corresponding quirk in
>unusual_devs.h, which applies only to bcdDevice = 0x0209.? Should we
>simply limit the existing unusual_uas.h quirk in the same way?
>
>Benjamin and Alan, you two appear to be the people who originally
>reported the need for this uas quirk.? Do you have any objection to
>changing the bcdDevice range from 0x0000 - 0x9999 to 0x0209 - 0x0209??
>Or can you suggest a range that does not include 0x0310?
>
>Alan Stern
Of course, we cannot have two quirks on devices with the same PID and VID.
However, since we do not have the INIC-3069 USB device here, we cannot
determine how to narrow down the scope. As you suggested,
it would be best to narrow the bcdDevice range to 0x0209 - 0x0209.
Chen Changcheng
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-10 1:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 6:10 [PATCH] usb: usb-storage: No additional quirks need to be added to the ECD819-SU3 optical drive ccc194101
2025-11-07 15:49 ` Alan Stern
2025-11-10 1:41 ` ccc194101 [this message]
2025-11-11 9:16 ` Alan Swanson
2025-11-09 4:53 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-09 5:05 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202511100941253989454@163.com \
--to=ccc194101@163.com \
--cc=benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com \
--cc=chenchangcheng@kylinos.cn \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=reiver@improbability.net \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.