All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>
To: libaokun@huaweicloud.com
Cc: linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, adilger.kernel@dilger.ca,
	jack@suse.cz, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel@pankajraghav.com, mcgrof@kernel.org, ebiggers@kernel.org,
	willy@infradead.org, yi.zhang@huawei.com, yangerkun@huawei.com,
	chengzhihao1@huawei.com, libaokun1@huawei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 24/24] ext4: enable block size larger than page size
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 10:16:04 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251110151604.GE2988753@mit.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251107144249.435029-25-libaokun@huaweicloud.com>

On Fri, Nov 07, 2025 at 10:42:49PM +0800, libaokun@huaweicloud.com wrote:
> From: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
> 
> Since block device (See commit 3c20917120ce ("block/bdev: enable large
> folio support for large logical block sizes")) and page cache (See commit
> ab95d23bab220ef8 ("filemap: allocate mapping_min_order folios in the page
> cache")) has the ability to have a minimum order when allocating folio,
> and ext4 has supported large folio in commit 7ac67301e82f ("ext4: enable
> large folio for regular file"), now add support for block_size > PAGE_SIZE
> in ext4.
> 
> set_blocksize() -> bdev_validate_blocksize() already validates the block
> size, so ext4_load_super() does not need to perform additional checks.
> 
> Here we only need to add the FS_LBS bit to fs_flags.
> 
> In addition, allocation failures for large folios may trigger warn_alloc()
> warnings. Therefore, as with XFS, mark this feature as experimental.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Baokun Li <libaokun1@huawei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@huawei.com>

Could you add:

#ifdef CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGES
EXT4_ATTR_FEATURE(blocksize_gt_pagesize);
#endif

in fs/sys/sysfs.c, so that userspace programs (like those in e2fsprogs
and xfstests) can test /sys/fs/ext4/features/... to determine whether
or not blocksize > pagesize is supported?  That way we can more easily
determine whether to test the 64k blocksize configurations in
xfstests, and so we can supress the mke2fs warnings:

mke2fs: 65536-byte blocks too big for system (max 4096)
Proceed anyway? (y,N) y
Warning: 65536-byte blocks too big for system (max 4096), forced to continue

... if the feature flag file is present.

Thanks!!

	 	    	       	       - Ted

  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-10 15:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-07 14:42 [PATCH v2 00/24] ext4: enable block size larger than page size libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 01/24] ext4: remove page offset calculation in ext4_block_zero_page_range() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 02/24] ext4: remove page offset calculation in ext4_block_truncate_page() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 03/24] ext4: remove PAGE_SIZE checks for rec_len conversion libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 04/24] ext4: make ext4_punch_hole() support large block size libaokun
2025-11-10  9:35   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 05/24] ext4: enable DIOREAD_NOLOCK by default for BS > PS as well libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 06/24] ext4: introduce s_min_folio_order for future BS > PS support libaokun
2025-11-10 12:09   ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 07/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_calculate_overhead() libaokun
2025-11-10  9:36   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 08/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_readdir() libaokun
2025-11-10 12:26   ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-10 13:53     ` Baokun Li
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 09/24] ext4: add EXT4_LBLK_TO_B macro for logical block to bytes conversion libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 10/24] ext4: add EXT4_LBLK_TO_PG and EXT4_PG_TO_LBLK for block/page conversion libaokun
2025-11-10  9:37   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 11/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mb_load_buddy_gfp() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 12/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mb_get_buddy_page_lock() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 13/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mb_init_cache() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 14/24] ext4: prepare buddy cache inode for BS > PS with large folios libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 15/24] ext4: rename 'page' references to 'folio' in multi-block allocator libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 16/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_mpage_readpages() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 17/24] ext4: support large block size in ext4_block_write_begin() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 18/24] ext4: support large block size in mpage_map_and_submit_buffers() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 19/24] ext4: support large block size in mpage_prepare_extent_to_map() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 20/24] ext4: support large block size in __ext4_block_zero_page_range() libaokun
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 21/24] ext4: make data=journal support large block size libaokun
2025-11-10  9:48   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-10 11:53     ` Baokun Li
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 22/24] ext4: support verifying data from large folios with fs-verity libaokun
2025-11-10  9:54   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-10 12:08     ` Baokun Li
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 23/24] ext4: add checks for large folio incompatibilities when BS > PS libaokun
2025-11-10  9:59   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-07 14:42 ` [PATCH v2 24/24] ext4: enable block size larger than page size libaokun
2025-11-10 10:00   ` Jan Kara
2025-11-10 12:51   ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-10 15:23     ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-11  3:31     ` Baokun Li
2025-11-10 15:16   ` Theodore Ts'o [this message]
2025-11-11  3:43     ` Baokun Li
2025-11-10  4:32 ` [PATCH v2 00/24] " Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-10  6:18   ` Baokun Li
2025-11-10 15:34   ` Pankaj Raghav
2025-11-10 17:40     ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-11 23:54 ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-12  2:19   ` Baokun Li
2025-11-12  4:02     ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-12  5:23       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-12  6:27       ` Baokun Li
2025-11-12 15:29         ` Theodore Ts'o
2025-11-13  9:14           ` Baokun Li
2025-11-12  2:49   ` Baokun Li

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251110151604.GE2988753@mit.edu \
    --to=tytso@mit.edu \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
    --cc=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=kernel@pankajraghav.com \
    --cc=libaokun1@huawei.com \
    --cc=libaokun@huaweicloud.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=yangerkun@huawei.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.