From: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
To: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Cc: <james.morse@arm.com>, <amitsinght@marvell.com>,
<baisheng.gao@unisoc.com>, <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>,
<bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com>, <carl@os.amperecomputing.com>,
<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <dakr@kernel.org>,
<dave.martin@arm.com>, <david@redhat.com>,
<dfustini@baylibre.com>, <fenghuay@nvidia.com>,
<gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>, <gshan@redhat.com>,
<guohanjun@huawei.com>, <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
<kobak@nvidia.com>, <lcherian@marvell.com>, <lenb@kernel.org>,
<linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
<peternewman@google.com>, <quic_jiles@quicinc.com>,
<rafael@kernel.org>, <robh@kernel.org>, <rohit.mathew@arm.com>,
<scott@os.amperecomputing.com>, <sdonthineni@nvidia.com>,
<sudeep.holla@arm.com>, <tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com>,
<will@kernel.org>, <xhao@linux.alibaba.com>,
"Shaopeng Tan" <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/33] arm_mpam: Add the class and component structures for firmware described ris
Date: Mon, 10 Nov 2025 17:10:41 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251110171041.00000a0d@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251107123450.664001-12-ben.horgan@arm.com>
On Fri, 7 Nov 2025 12:34:28 +0000
Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com> wrote:
> From: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
>
> An MSC is a container of resources, each identified by their RIS index.
> Some RIS are described by firmware to provide their position in the system.
> Others are discovered when the driver probes the hardware.
>
> To configure a resource it needs to be found by its class, e.g. 'L2'.
> There are two kinds of grouping, a class is a set of components, which
> are visible to user-space as there are likely to be multiple instances
> of the L2 cache. (e.g. one per cluster or package)
>
> Add support for creating and destroying structures to allow a hierarchy
> of resources to be created.
>
> CC: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
Hi Ben,
Remember to clear out CC'ing yourself.
> Tested-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghuay@nvidia.com>
> Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com>
> Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@google.com>
> Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@arm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@arm.com>
> ---
> Changes since v3:
> Jonathan:
> Code reordering.
I'm guessing I may have sent things in a slightly less than ideal directly.
Why can't we have ordering as follows (with no forwards declarations)
mpam_class_alloc()
mpam_class_destroy()
//maybe other mpam_class stuff here
mpam_component_alloc()
mpam_component_destroy() - needs mpam_class_destroy()
//maybe other mpam_component stuff here
mpam_vmsc_alloc()
mpam_vmsc_destroy() - needs mpam_component_destroy()
//other mpam_vmsc here
mpam_ris_create_locked() - needs all the destroys.
mpam_ris_destroy() - needs mpam vmsc_destroy()
I may well have missed a more complex dependency chain.
Other than that, LGTM. Given any change in ordering can be trivially verified
by building it and Gavin's comments seem simple to resolve.
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@huawei.com>
> Comments.
> ---
> drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c | 393 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> drivers/resctrl/mpam_internal.h | 94 ++++++++
> include/linux/arm_mpam.h | 5 +
> 3 files changed, 491 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> index 6c6be133d73a..48a344d5cb43 100644
> --- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> +++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_devices.c
> @@ -36,6 +36,384 @@ struct srcu_struct mpam_srcu;
> */
> static atomic_t mpam_num_msc;
>
> +/*
> + * An MSC is a physical container for controls and monitors, each identified by
> + * their RIS index. These share a base-address, interrupts and some MMIO
> + * registers. A vMSC is a virtual container for RIS in an MSC that control or
> + * monitor the same thing. Members of a vMSC are all RIS in the same MSC, but
> + * not all RIS in an MSC share a vMSC.
> + * Components are a group of vMSC that control or monitor the same thing but
> + * are from different MSC, so have different base-address, interrupts etc.
> + * Classes are the set components of the same type.
> + *
> + * The features of a vMSC is the union of the RIS it contains.
> + * The features of a Class and Component are the common subset of the vMSC
> + * they contain.
> + *
> + * e.g. The system cache may have bandwidth controls on multiple interfaces,
> + * for regulating traffic from devices independently of traffic from CPUs.
> + * If these are two RIS in one MSC, they will be treated as controlling
> + * different things, and will not share a vMSC/component/class.
> + *
> + * e.g. The L2 may have one MSC and two RIS, one for cache-controls another
> + * for bandwidth. These two RIS are members of the same vMSC.
> + *
> + * e.g. The set of RIS that make up the L2 are grouped as a component. These
> + * are sometimes termed slices. They should be configured the same, as if there
> + * were only one.
> + *
> + * e.g. The SoC probably has more than one L2, each attached to a distinct set
> + * of CPUs. All the L2 components are grouped as a class.
> + *
> + * When creating an MSC, struct mpam_msc is added to the all mpam_all_msc list,
> + * then linked via struct mpam_ris to a vmsc, component and class.
> + * The same MSC may exist under different class->component->vmsc paths, but the
> + * RIS index will be unique.
> + */
> +LIST_HEAD(mpam_classes);
> +
> +/* List of all objects that can be free()d after synchronise_srcu() */
> +static LLIST_HEAD(mpam_garbage);
> +
> +static inline void init_garbage(struct mpam_garbage *garbage)
> +{
> + init_llist_node(&garbage->llist);
> +}
> +
> +#define add_to_garbage(x) \
> +do { \
> + __typeof__(x) _x = (x); \
> + _x->garbage.to_free = _x; \
> + llist_add(&_x->garbage.llist, &mpam_garbage); \
> +} while (0)
> +
> +static void mpam_free_garbage(void)
> +{
> + struct mpam_garbage *iter, *tmp;
> + struct llist_node *to_free = llist_del_all(&mpam_garbage);
> +
> + if (!to_free)
> + return;
> +
> + synchronize_srcu(&mpam_srcu);
> +
> + llist_for_each_entry_safe(iter, tmp, to_free, llist) {
> + if (iter->pdev)
> + devm_kfree(&iter->pdev->dev, iter->to_free);
> + else
> + kfree(iter->to_free);
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static struct mpam_vmsc *
> +mpam_vmsc_alloc(struct mpam_component *comp, struct mpam_msc *msc)
> +{
> + struct mpam_vmsc *vmsc;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&mpam_list_lock);
> +
> + vmsc = kzalloc(sizeof(*vmsc), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!vmsc)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> + init_garbage(&vmsc->garbage);
> +
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(&vmsc->ris);
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(&vmsc->comp_list);
> + vmsc->comp = comp;
> + vmsc->msc = msc;
> +
> + list_add_rcu(&vmsc->comp_list, &comp->vmsc);
> +
> + return vmsc;
> +}
> +
> +static void mpam_component_destroy(struct mpam_component *comp);
> +
> +static void mpam_vmsc_destroy(struct mpam_vmsc *vmsc)
> +{
> + struct mpam_component *comp = vmsc->comp;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&mpam_list_lock);
> +
> + list_del_rcu(&vmsc->comp_list);
> + add_to_garbage(vmsc);
> +
> + if (list_empty(&comp->vmsc))
> + mpam_component_destroy(comp);
> +}
> +
> +static struct mpam_vmsc *
> +mpam_vmsc_find(struct mpam_component *comp, struct mpam_msc *msc)
> +{
> + struct mpam_vmsc *vmsc;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&mpam_list_lock);
> +
> + list_for_each_entry(vmsc, &comp->vmsc, comp_list) {
> + if (vmsc->msc->id == msc->id)
> + return vmsc;
> + }
> +
> + return mpam_vmsc_alloc(comp, msc);
> +}
> +
> +static struct mpam_component *
> +mpam_component_alloc(struct mpam_class *class, int id)
> +{
> + struct mpam_component *comp;
> +
> + lockdep_assert_held(&mpam_list_lock);
> +
> + comp = kzalloc(sizeof(*comp), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!comp)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> + init_garbage(&comp->garbage);
> +
> + comp->comp_id = id;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(&comp->vmsc);
> + /* affinity is updated when ris are added */
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD_RCU(&comp->class_list);
> + comp->class = class;
> +
> + list_add_rcu(&comp->class_list, &class->components);
> +
> + return comp;
> +}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-10 17:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 147+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-07 12:34 [PATCH 00/33] arm_mpam: Add basic mpam driver Ben Horgan
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 01/33] ACPI / PPTT: Add a helper to fill a cpumask from a processor container Ben Horgan
2025-11-08 4:31 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-12 10:14 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-12 5:45 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 02/33] ACPI / PPTT: Stop acpi_count_levels() expecting callers to clear levels Ben Horgan
2025-11-11 7:34 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 03/33] ACPI / PPTT: Add acpi_pptt_cache_v1_full to use pptt cache as one structure Ben Horgan
2025-11-08 4:54 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-10 15:51 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-10 15:46 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-10 16:28 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-10 17:00 ` Jeremy Linton
2025-11-11 16:48 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-12 20:22 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 04/33] ACPI / PPTT: Find cache level by cache-id Ben Horgan
2025-11-08 5:11 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-10 16:02 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-11 17:02 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-12 20:23 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 05/33] ACPI / PPTT: Add a helper to fill a cpumask from a cache_id Ben Horgan
2025-11-08 5:10 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-10 16:04 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-12 20:26 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 06/33] arm64: kconfig: Add Kconfig entry for MPAM Ben Horgan
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 07/33] platform: Define platform_device_put cleanup handler Ben Horgan
2025-11-10 1:03 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-10 16:07 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-12 20:32 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 08/33] ACPI: Define acpi_put_table cleanup handler and acpi_get_table_ret() helper Ben Horgan
2025-11-10 1:03 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-10 16:11 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-12 7:02 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-11-12 20:39 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 09/33] ACPI / MPAM: Parse the MPAM table Ben Horgan
2025-11-08 8:54 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-10 16:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-12 14:45 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-10 16:23 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-12 7:01 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-11-12 14:55 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-13 2:16 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-11-13 12:09 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-13 2:33 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-11-13 14:24 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 10/33] arm_mpam: Add probe/remove for mpam msc driver and kbuild boiler plate Ben Horgan
2025-11-08 9:28 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-10 16:44 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-12 15:32 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-10 16:58 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-12 16:05 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-12 7:22 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-11-12 15:37 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-13 2:46 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 11/33] arm_mpam: Add the class and component structures for firmware described ris Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 0:07 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-12 16:39 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-12 16:48 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-10 17:10 ` Jonathan Cameron [this message]
2025-11-12 17:21 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-12 7:29 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-11-13 3:23 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-11-13 16:39 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 12/33] arm_mpam: Add MPAM MSC register layout definitions Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 0:25 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 13/33] arm_mpam: Add cpuhp callbacks to probe MSC hardware Ben Horgan
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 14/33] arm_mpam: Probe hardware to find the supported partid/pmg values Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 0:43 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-10 23:26 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-11 9:30 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-12 7:57 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-11-13 3:50 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-11-13 16:43 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 15/33] arm_mpam: Add helpers for managing the locking around the mon_sel registers Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 0:49 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-12 8:03 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-11-13 3:52 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 16/33] arm_mpam: Probe the hardware features resctrl supports Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 21:55 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-12 8:17 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 17/33] arm_mpam: Merge supported features during mpam_enable() into mpam_class Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 21:59 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-12 8:24 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 18/33] arm_mpam: Reset MSC controls from cpuhp callbacks Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 22:11 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 19/33] arm_mpam: Add a helper to touch an MSC from any CPU Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 22:13 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-14 2:47 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 20/33] arm_mpam: Extend reset logic to allow devices to be reset any time Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 22:16 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-13 20:24 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-11-14 2:52 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 21/33] arm_mpam: Register and enable IRQs Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 22:18 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 22/33] arm_mpam: Use a static key to indicate when mpam is enabled Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 22:20 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-14 4:37 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 23/33] arm_mpam: Allow configuration to be applied and restored during cpu online Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 22:59 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-13 17:14 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-10 17:27 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-11 17:45 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-14 10:33 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-14 14:34 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 24/33] arm_mpam: Probe and reset the rest of the features Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 23:01 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-14 7:04 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 25/33] arm_mpam: Add helpers to allocate monitors Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 23:02 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-14 7:14 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 26/33] arm_mpam: Add mpam_msmon_read() to read monitor value Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 23:13 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-14 10:07 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-12 5:33 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 27/33] arm_mpam: Track bandwidth counter state for power management Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 23:15 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-10 13:49 ` Zeng Heng
2025-11-10 17:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 28/33] arm_mpam: Consider overflow in bandwidth counter state Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 23:16 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-10 13:50 ` Zeng Heng
2025-11-10 17:32 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 29/33] arm_mpam: Probe for long/lwd mbwu counters Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 23:16 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 30/33] arm_mpam: Use long MBWU counters if supported Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 23:17 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 31/33] arm_mpam: Add helper to reset saved mbwu state Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 23:18 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-10 17:34 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 32/33] arm_mpam: Add kunit test for bitmap reset Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 23:19 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-07 12:34 ` [PATCH 33/33] arm_mpam: Add kunit tests for props_mismatch() Ben Horgan
2025-11-09 23:19 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-07 12:47 ` [PATCH 00/33] arm_mpam: Add basic mpam driver Ben Horgan
2025-11-07 21:22 ` Fenghua Yu
2025-11-07 23:22 ` Carl Worth
2025-11-10 16:15 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-11 0:45 ` Carl Worth
2025-11-10 1:05 ` Gavin Shan
2025-11-10 13:56 ` Zeng Heng
2025-11-10 16:03 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-11 7:09 ` Shaopeng Tan (Fujitsu)
2025-11-16 17:16 ` Drew Fustini
2025-11-18 14:11 ` Ben Horgan
2025-11-18 22:55 ` Drew Fustini
2025-11-19 10:00 ` Jonathan Cameron
2025-11-19 20:09 ` Drew Fustini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251110171041.00000a0d@huawei.com \
--to=jonathan.cameron@huawei.com \
--cc=amitsinght@marvell.com \
--cc=baisheng.gao@unisoc.com \
--cc=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=ben.horgan@arm.com \
--cc=bobo.shaobowang@huawei.com \
--cc=carl@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=dakr@kernel.org \
--cc=dave.martin@arm.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dfustini@baylibre.com \
--cc=fenghuay@nvidia.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=gshan@redhat.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=james.morse@arm.com \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=kobak@nvidia.com \
--cc=lcherian@marvell.com \
--cc=lenb@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=peternewman@google.com \
--cc=quic_jiles@quicinc.com \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=robh@kernel.org \
--cc=rohit.mathew@arm.com \
--cc=scott@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=sdonthineni@nvidia.com \
--cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@fujitsu.com \
--cc=tan.shaopeng@jp.fujitsu.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.