From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 678053081AB; Tue, 11 Nov 2025 01:40:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762825222; cv=none; b=K3OC2x8PknqOZKtzhfdNjyq17YYkRVFACVWWr2X2h482uCIeuEiCpzX+vmcwP33nkMxA1zbV9F3qd/CBvAB9SI8dedwR9LtApnaD+YQZPnvm1fUvXNk2yUZa35Fdnx4oVJJ1ogDMU5Epu4jTKvlrn7G8rV2OJTcXacBlvEn+gdU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762825222; c=relaxed/simple; bh=d60mMrOMkltGPQSWdDny0lxGi9yMjLTJvlQ1kgVJyOI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=N85rhTk0dgmJyCD/a3gKmTnAb2vf5mADDvAtzMQx2ekKPc7hcnVy9Qm5V9h8ehh9dGsmnoSq17A/lYLcAGMFiL2xZEEuf+W5834A9DTIbQSUKRTuQJ1Wa7VLO5V3WES6Z37q6T3L7NEVtkEPrce9xVy5mmxJ0KAEZ0rAXoOTl2s= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b=EeyXuDp8; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linuxfoundation.org header.i=@linuxfoundation.org header.b="EeyXuDp8" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4DE9C116B1; Tue, 11 Nov 2025 01:40:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linuxfoundation.org; s=korg; t=1762825222; bh=d60mMrOMkltGPQSWdDny0lxGi9yMjLTJvlQ1kgVJyOI=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=EeyXuDp8Aad9v3RVNRB3U2GnIF8qcuGmWGGQfaYnKTxy8kD9q9VdXH/sO0/3GHuw2 yc8WY9ySTkPnUvbyatpHGl8ZT9TQ0HSL05djB/XvVxxB7siXFRzuP2wG/WpvPs2AKs Ygt9tJXeyBrhkeHGfZOtRhW2GaeWkBeJv8dtsMPs= From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , patches@lists.linux.dev, Chi Zhiling , Namjae Jeon , Sasha Levin Subject: [PATCH 6.17 669/849] exfat: limit log print for IO error Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 09:43:59 +0900 Message-ID: <20251111004552.595998494@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.51.2 In-Reply-To: <20251111004536.460310036@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20251111004536.460310036@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.69 X-stable: review X-Patchwork-Hint: ignore Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: patches@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit 6.17-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Chi Zhiling [ Upstream commit 6dfba108387bf4e71411b3da90b2d5cce48ba054 ] For exFAT filesystems with 4MB read_ahead_size, removing the storage device when the read operation is in progress, which cause the last read syscall spent 150s [1]. The main reason is that exFAT generates excessive log messages [2]. After applying this patch, approximately 300,000 lines of log messages were suppressed, and the delay of the last read() syscall was reduced to about 4 seconds. [1]: write(5, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 131072) = 131072 <0.000120> read(4, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 131072) = 131072 <0.000032> write(5, "\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 131072) = 131072 <0.000119> read(4, 0x7fccf28ae000, 131072) = -1 EIO (Input/output error) <150.186215> [2]: [ 333.696603] exFAT-fs (vdb): error, failed to access to FAT (entry 0x0000d780, err:-5) [ 333.697378] exFAT-fs (vdb): error, failed to access to FAT (entry 0x0000d780, err:-5) [ 333.698156] exFAT-fs (vdb): error, failed to access to FAT (entry 0x0000d780, err:-5) Signed-off-by: Chi Zhiling Signed-off-by: Namjae Jeon Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- fs/exfat/fatent.c | 11 ++++++----- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/exfat/fatent.c b/fs/exfat/fatent.c index 232cc7f8ab92f..825083634ba2d 100644 --- a/fs/exfat/fatent.c +++ b/fs/exfat/fatent.c @@ -89,35 +89,36 @@ int exfat_ent_get(struct super_block *sb, unsigned int loc, int err; if (!is_valid_cluster(sbi, loc)) { - exfat_fs_error(sb, "invalid access to FAT (entry 0x%08x)", + exfat_fs_error_ratelimit(sb, + "invalid access to FAT (entry 0x%08x)", loc); return -EIO; } err = __exfat_ent_get(sb, loc, content); if (err) { - exfat_fs_error(sb, + exfat_fs_error_ratelimit(sb, "failed to access to FAT (entry 0x%08x, err:%d)", loc, err); return err; } if (*content == EXFAT_FREE_CLUSTER) { - exfat_fs_error(sb, + exfat_fs_error_ratelimit(sb, "invalid access to FAT free cluster (entry 0x%08x)", loc); return -EIO; } if (*content == EXFAT_BAD_CLUSTER) { - exfat_fs_error(sb, + exfat_fs_error_ratelimit(sb, "invalid access to FAT bad cluster (entry 0x%08x)", loc); return -EIO; } if (*content != EXFAT_EOF_CLUSTER && !is_valid_cluster(sbi, *content)) { - exfat_fs_error(sb, + exfat_fs_error_ratelimit(sb, "invalid access to FAT (entry 0x%08x) bogus content (0x%08x)", loc, *content); return -EIO; -- 2.51.0