All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
To: brauner@kernel.org
Cc: hch@infradead.org, djwong@kernel.org, bfoster@redhat.com,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@meta.com,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: [PATCH v4 6/9] iomap: simplify when reads can be skipped for writes
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2025 11:36:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251111193658.3495942-7-joannelkoong@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251111193658.3495942-1-joannelkoong@gmail.com>

Currently, the logic for skipping the read range for a write is

if (!(iter->flags & IOMAP_UNSHARE) &&
    (from <= poff || from >= poff + plen) &&
    (to <= poff || to >= poff + plen))

which breaks down to skipping the read if any of these are true:
a) from <= poff && to <= poff
b) from <= poff && to >= poff + plen
c) from >= poff + plen && to <= poff
d) from >= poff + plen && to >= poff + plen

This can be simplified to
if (!(iter->flags & IOMAP_UNSHARE) && from <= poff && to >= poff + plen)

from the following reasoning:

a) from <= poff && to <= poff
This reduces to 'to <= poff' since it is guaranteed that 'from <= to'
(since to = from + len). It is not possible for 'from <= to' to be true
here because we only reach here if plen > 0 (thanks to the preceding 'if
(plen == 0)' check that would break us out of the loop). If 'to <=
poff', plen would have to be 0 since poff and plen get adjusted in
lockstep for uptodate blocks. This means we can eliminate this check.

c) from >= poff + plen && to <= poff
This is not possible since 'from <= to' and 'plen > 0'. We can eliminate
this check.

d) from >= poff + plen && to >= poff + plen
This reduces to 'from >= poff + plen' since 'from <= to'.
It is not possible for 'from >= poff + plen' to be true here. We only
reach here if plen > 0 and for writes, poff and plen will always be
block-aligned, which means poff <= from < poff + plen. We can eliminate
this check.

The only valid check is b) from <= poff && to >= poff + plen.

Signed-off-by: Joanne Koong <joannelkoong@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
---
 fs/iomap/buffered-io.c | 9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
index c82b5b24d4b3..17449ea13420 100644
--- a/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
+++ b/fs/iomap/buffered-io.c
@@ -758,9 +758,12 @@ static int __iomap_write_begin(const struct iomap_iter *iter,
 		if (plen == 0)
 			break;
 
-		if (!(iter->flags & IOMAP_UNSHARE) &&
-		    (from <= poff || from >= poff + plen) &&
-		    (to <= poff || to >= poff + plen))
+		/*
+		 * If the read range will be entirely overwritten by the write,
+		 * we can skip having to zero/read it in.
+		 */
+		if (!(iter->flags & IOMAP_UNSHARE) && from <= poff &&
+		    to >= poff + plen)
 			continue;
 
 		if (iomap_block_needs_zeroing(iter, block_start)) {
-- 
2.47.3


  parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-11 19:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-11 19:36 [PATCH v4 0/9] iomap: buffered io changes Joanne Koong
2025-11-11 19:36 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] iomap: rename bytes_pending/bytes_accounted to bytes_submitted/bytes_not_submitted Joanne Koong
2025-11-11 19:36 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] iomap: account for unaligned end offsets when truncating read range Joanne Koong
2025-11-11 19:36 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] docs: document iomap writeback's iomap_finish_folio_write() requirement Joanne Koong
2025-11-11 19:36 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] iomap: optimize pending async writeback accounting Joanne Koong
2025-11-11 19:36 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] iomap: simplify ->read_folio_range() error handling for reads Joanne Koong
2025-11-17 20:46   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-11-17 23:26     ` Joanne Koong
2025-11-11 19:36 ` Joanne Koong [this message]
2025-11-11 19:36 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] iomap: use loff_t for file positions and offsets in writeback code Joanne Koong
2025-11-19  3:40   ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-11-19 18:10     ` Joanne Koong
2025-11-19 18:27       ` Darrick J. Wong
2025-11-19 19:17         ` Joanne Koong
2025-11-19 19:35           ` Matthew Wilcox
2025-11-20  0:38             ` Joanne Koong
2025-11-25  9:22               ` Christian Brauner
2025-11-11 19:36 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] iomap: use find_next_bit() for dirty bitmap scanning Joanne Koong
2025-11-11 19:36 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] iomap: use find_next_bit() for uptodate " Joanne Koong
2025-11-12 10:34 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] iomap: buffered io changes Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20251111193658.3495942-7-joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --to=joannelkoong@gmail.com \
    --cc=bfoster@redhat.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=kernel-team@meta.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.